Short- and mid-term results after total elbow replacement with the Nexel total elbow arthroplasty: a consecutive case series of 45 elbows

Background

The Nexel total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an evolution of the Coonrad-Morrey linked TEA. Theoretically, the new design has shown better mechanical properties, but the first clinical studies showed concerning rates of implant loosening, leading the authors to advocate for the discontinued use of the implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short to mid-term results with the Nexel TEA in a single center cohort.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2020, 41 consecutive patients received 45 Nexel primary TEA at one institution. The cohort consisted of 5 men and 36 women with a mean age at surgery was 70 years (range, 42-93 years). The indications for primary TEA included 18 cases of rheumatoid arthritis, 24 acute fractures, and 3 cases of primary osteoarthritis. Follow-up assessment included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Oxford Elbow Score, range of motion, radiographic evaluation of implant loosening, complications, reasons for revision.

Results

The mean follow-up was 35 months (range 12-75 months). The median Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 82.5 points (range, 65- 100 points) and the Oxford Elbow Score was median 41.5 points (range, 17- 48 points). Mean range of motion at follow-up was; flexion 134° (range, 90°-140°), extension deficit 16° (range, 0°-90°), supination 71° (range, 30°-90°) and pronation 71° (range, 30°-90°). Radiolucent lines were observed in five cases around the humeral component and in one case around the ulnar component. There were four minor complications including prominent medial epicondyle, superficial infection, and transient ulnar nerve dysesthesia. Five elbows underwent revision surgery, three due to aseptic loosening of the humeral component, one due to periprosthetic fracture of the humerus, and one due to deep infection. The implant survival rate was 93.8% at 3 years.

Conclusion

The short- to mid-term clinical and functional results with the Nexel TEA in this series are promising. The study could not demonstrate a similar high revision rate as reported by other authors. However, longer follow-up time and larger series are warranted.