通过实验法应用 RADEC 学习模式提高学生自然科学学习中的批判性思维能力 动物运动器官材料五班 SDN 13 Singkawang

Rindi Afriani, Susan Neni Triani, Erdi Guna Utama
{"title":"通过实验法应用 RADEC 学习模式提高学生自然科学学习中的批判性思维能力 动物运动器官材料五班 SDN 13 Singkawang","authors":"Rindi Afriani, Susan Neni Triani, Erdi Guna Utama","doi":"10.57235/jpa.v3i1.2182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to: 1) To describe the differences between the RADEC learning model through the experimental method on the critical thinking abilities of students who study with the RADEC learning model and classes that use direct learning in class V science learning at SDN 13 Singkawang; 2) To describe the implementation of the RADEC learning model through the experimental method on the critical thinking abilities of class V students at SDN 13 Singkawang in science learning; 3) To describe students' responses to the RADEC learning model through experimental methods on students' critical thinking abilities. This research is a quantitative experimental research. This research method is a quasi experimental design, with a post-test only control group design. The population of this study was all fifth grade students, totaling 50 students. Samples were taken using probability sampling techniques with saturated sampling. Data collection techniques use test and non-test techniques. The test instrument is a critical thinking ability question sheet in the form of an essay. Meanwhile, non-tests are in the form of model implementation observation sheets and student response questionnaire sheets. The data analysis technique used was a two-sample t test. The results of the research, 1) show that tcount = 3.844 ttable = 2.010, which means that there is a significant difference in the results of students' critical thinking ability tests between students who applied the RADEC model through the experimental method and students who used the direct learning model. 2) The results of the model implementation analysis show a percentage of 90.5%, very good criteria and 3) the results of the analysis of student response questionnaires show a percentage of 75% good criteria, which means that learning using the RADEC learning model through the experimental method in science learning has an effect on critical thinking skills. students' science, so that students respond well to learning activities. So it can be concluded that the RADEC learning model during the learning process makes an impression, attracts students' attention, and provides a new learning atmosphere","PeriodicalId":477227,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Amartha","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the RADEC Learning Model through the Experimental Method on Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Natural Science Learning Animal Movement Organ Material Class V SDN 13 Singkawang\",\"authors\":\"Rindi Afriani, Susan Neni Triani, Erdi Guna Utama\",\"doi\":\"10.57235/jpa.v3i1.2182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to: 1) To describe the differences between the RADEC learning model through the experimental method on the critical thinking abilities of students who study with the RADEC learning model and classes that use direct learning in class V science learning at SDN 13 Singkawang; 2) To describe the implementation of the RADEC learning model through the experimental method on the critical thinking abilities of class V students at SDN 13 Singkawang in science learning; 3) To describe students' responses to the RADEC learning model through experimental methods on students' critical thinking abilities. This research is a quantitative experimental research. This research method is a quasi experimental design, with a post-test only control group design. The population of this study was all fifth grade students, totaling 50 students. Samples were taken using probability sampling techniques with saturated sampling. Data collection techniques use test and non-test techniques. The test instrument is a critical thinking ability question sheet in the form of an essay. Meanwhile, non-tests are in the form of model implementation observation sheets and student response questionnaire sheets. The data analysis technique used was a two-sample t test. The results of the research, 1) show that tcount = 3.844 ttable = 2.010, which means that there is a significant difference in the results of students' critical thinking ability tests between students who applied the RADEC model through the experimental method and students who used the direct learning model. 2) The results of the model implementation analysis show a percentage of 90.5%, very good criteria and 3) the results of the analysis of student response questionnaires show a percentage of 75% good criteria, which means that learning using the RADEC learning model through the experimental method in science learning has an effect on critical thinking skills. students' science, so that students respond well to learning activities. So it can be concluded that the RADEC learning model during the learning process makes an impression, attracts students' attention, and provides a new learning atmosphere\",\"PeriodicalId\":477227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Amartha\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Amartha\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57235/jpa.v3i1.2182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Amartha","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57235/jpa.v3i1.2182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在1) 通过对 SDN 13 Singkawang 五年级科学学习中使用 RADEC 学习模式和使用直接学习模式的班级学生批判性思维能力的实验方法,描述 RADEC 学习模式的差异;2) 通过对 SDN 13 Singkawang 五年级科学学习中学生批判性思维能力的实验方法,描述 RADEC 学习模式的实施情况;3) 通过对学生批判性思维能力的实验方法,描述学生对 RADEC 学习模式的反应。本研究为定量实验研究。研究方法为准实验设计,仅采用后测对照组设计。研究对象为五年级全体学生,共 50 人。样本采用概率抽样技术,饱和抽样。数据收集技术采用测试和非测试技术。测试工具是以作文形式呈现的批判性思维能力问题表。同时,非测试的形式是模型实施观察表和学生回答问卷表。采用的数据分析技术是双样本 t 检验。研究结果表明:1)tcount = 3.844 ttable = 2.010,即通过实验方法应用 RADEC 模式的学生与采用直接学习模式的学生在学生批判性思维能力测试结果上存在显著差异。2)模式实施分析的结果显示,很好标准的比例为 90.5%;3)学生回答问卷分析的结果显示,好标准的比例为 75%,这说明在科学学习中通过实验法使用 RADEC 学习模式对学生的批判性思维能力有影响,使学生对学习活动反应良好。因此可以得出这样的结论:在学习过程中,RADEC 学习模式给人留下了深刻的印象,吸引了学生的注意力,提供了一种新的学习氛围
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of the RADEC Learning Model through the Experimental Method on Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Natural Science Learning Animal Movement Organ Material Class V SDN 13 Singkawang
This research aims to: 1) To describe the differences between the RADEC learning model through the experimental method on the critical thinking abilities of students who study with the RADEC learning model and classes that use direct learning in class V science learning at SDN 13 Singkawang; 2) To describe the implementation of the RADEC learning model through the experimental method on the critical thinking abilities of class V students at SDN 13 Singkawang in science learning; 3) To describe students' responses to the RADEC learning model through experimental methods on students' critical thinking abilities. This research is a quantitative experimental research. This research method is a quasi experimental design, with a post-test only control group design. The population of this study was all fifth grade students, totaling 50 students. Samples were taken using probability sampling techniques with saturated sampling. Data collection techniques use test and non-test techniques. The test instrument is a critical thinking ability question sheet in the form of an essay. Meanwhile, non-tests are in the form of model implementation observation sheets and student response questionnaire sheets. The data analysis technique used was a two-sample t test. The results of the research, 1) show that tcount = 3.844 ttable = 2.010, which means that there is a significant difference in the results of students' critical thinking ability tests between students who applied the RADEC model through the experimental method and students who used the direct learning model. 2) The results of the model implementation analysis show a percentage of 90.5%, very good criteria and 3) the results of the analysis of student response questionnaires show a percentage of 75% good criteria, which means that learning using the RADEC learning model through the experimental method in science learning has an effect on critical thinking skills. students' science, so that students respond well to learning activities. So it can be concluded that the RADEC learning model during the learning process makes an impression, attracts students' attention, and provides a new learning atmosphere
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Content Analysis of Learning Videos on Indonesian Language Material in Elementary Schools on the Rumah Belajar Portal Online Learning Merdeka Belajar Kurikulum Merdeka Program Student Exchange from Universitas Negeri Riau with Universitas Negeri Padang Application of the RADEC Learning Model through the Experimental Method on Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Natural Science Learning Animal Movement Organ Material Class V SDN 13 Singkawang The Relationship Between Learning Activities and the Ability to Understand Natural Science Concepts in Class V The Relationship between Scout Extracurriculars and Discipline of Class V Students at State Elementary School 161 Pekanbaru
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1