肝移植低温高氧灌注与静态冷藏相比的结果。随机临床试验的系统回顾和元分析》。

Mario A. O'Connor Cordova , Alan G. Ortega-Macias , Francisco Altamirano , Maria E. Hoyos , Fernando Gonzalez-Zorrilla
{"title":"肝移植低温高氧灌注与静态冷藏相比的结果。随机临床试验的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Mario A. O'Connor Cordova ,&nbsp;Alan G. Ortega-Macias ,&nbsp;Francisco Altamirano ,&nbsp;Maria E. Hoyos ,&nbsp;Fernando Gonzalez-Zorrilla","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While liver transplant effectiveness in treating life-limiting liver disease is uncontested, challenges remain in organ preservation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed to determine the impact of Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) on liver transplant outcomes compared to static cold storage (SCS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of five studies were included, totaling 586 patients, out of which 267 patients had HOPE-preserved grafts and 319 SCS-preserved grafts. Analysis showed a significant decrease in early graft dysfunction and biliary complications in the HOPE group when compared to SCS (RR = 0.52; 95 % CI = 0.33–0.81]; <em>p</em> = 0.01) (RR = 0.75; 95 % CI = [0.60–0.94]; <em>p</em> = 0.02), respectively. Similarly, non-anastomotic biliary strictures were significantly reduced in the HOPE group (RR = 0.41; 95 % CI = [0.20–0.86]; <em>p</em> = 0.03). Of note, no statistical significance was found on the one-year graft loss and recipient death (RR = 0.40; 95 % CI = [0.09–1.83]; <em>p</em> = 0.12 and RR = 0.62; 95 % CI = [0.29–1.32]; <em>p</em> = 0.14, respectively). Likewise, no statistical difference was evident in acute rejection (RR = 0.54; 95 % CI = [0.04–7.14]; <em>p</em> = 0.20) and postreperfusion syndrome rate (RR = 0.92; 95 % CI = [0.35–2.41]; <em>p</em> = 0.73). After statistical analysis, no significant differences in major complications, primary nonfunction, re-transplantation, hepatic artery thrombosis, need for renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit, and hospital length of stay were evident.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Liver preservation techniques are gaining popularity by enabling rescue and transplantation of marginal livers. In this study, HOPE showed statistically significant differences in reducing rates of biliary complications, biliary stricture, and early graft dysfunction. Further studies are needed to evaluate financial burden and long-term outcomes to completely elucidate the impact of this organ preservation technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000278/pdfft?md5=8aafd4345bab5f3a7cc81bb71e11e7b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666967624000278-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of hypothermic hyperoxygenated perfusion compared to static cold storage for liver transplant. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials\",\"authors\":\"Mario A. O'Connor Cordova ,&nbsp;Alan G. Ortega-Macias ,&nbsp;Francisco Altamirano ,&nbsp;Maria E. Hoyos ,&nbsp;Fernando Gonzalez-Zorrilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While liver transplant effectiveness in treating life-limiting liver disease is uncontested, challenges remain in organ preservation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed to determine the impact of Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) on liver transplant outcomes compared to static cold storage (SCS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of five studies were included, totaling 586 patients, out of which 267 patients had HOPE-preserved grafts and 319 SCS-preserved grafts. Analysis showed a significant decrease in early graft dysfunction and biliary complications in the HOPE group when compared to SCS (RR = 0.52; 95 % CI = 0.33–0.81]; <em>p</em> = 0.01) (RR = 0.75; 95 % CI = [0.60–0.94]; <em>p</em> = 0.02), respectively. Similarly, non-anastomotic biliary strictures were significantly reduced in the HOPE group (RR = 0.41; 95 % CI = [0.20–0.86]; <em>p</em> = 0.03). Of note, no statistical significance was found on the one-year graft loss and recipient death (RR = 0.40; 95 % CI = [0.09–1.83]; <em>p</em> = 0.12 and RR = 0.62; 95 % CI = [0.29–1.32]; <em>p</em> = 0.14, respectively). Likewise, no statistical difference was evident in acute rejection (RR = 0.54; 95 % CI = [0.04–7.14]; <em>p</em> = 0.20) and postreperfusion syndrome rate (RR = 0.92; 95 % CI = [0.35–2.41]; <em>p</em> = 0.73). After statistical analysis, no significant differences in major complications, primary nonfunction, re-transplantation, hepatic artery thrombosis, need for renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit, and hospital length of stay were evident.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Liver preservation techniques are gaining popularity by enabling rescue and transplantation of marginal livers. In this study, HOPE showed statistically significant differences in reducing rates of biliary complications, biliary stricture, and early graft dysfunction. Further studies are needed to evaluate financial burden and long-term outcomes to completely elucidate the impact of this organ preservation technique.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000278/pdfft?md5=8aafd4345bab5f3a7cc81bb71e11e7b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666967624000278-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景虽然肝移植在治疗局限性肝病方面的有效性毋庸置疑,但在器官保存方面仍存在挑战。方法根据PRISMA指南,进行了一项系统性回顾,以确定低温氧合灌注(HOPE)与静态冷藏(SCS)相比对肝移植结果的影响。结果共纳入了5项研究,共有586名患者,其中267名患者的移植物由HOPE保存,319名患者的移植物由SCS保存。分析显示,与 SCS 相比,HOPE 组早期移植物功能障碍和胆道并发症明显减少(RR = 0.52; 95 % CI = 0.33-0.81]; p = 0.01)(RR = 0.75; 95 % CI = [0.60-0.94]; p = 0.02)。同样,HOPE 组非吻合口胆道狭窄也显著减少(RR = 0.41;95 % CI = [0.20-0.86];P = 0.03)。值得注意的是,一年期移植物损失和受体死亡没有统计学意义(RR = 0.40; 95 % CI = [0.09-1.83]; p = 0.12 和 RR = 0.62; 95 % CI = [0.29-1.32]; p = 0.14)。同样,急性排斥反应(RR = 0.54; 95 % CI = [0.04-7.14]; p = 0.20)和再灌注后综合征率(RR = 0.92; 95 % CI = [0.35-2.41]; p = 0.73)也没有明显的统计学差异。经过统计分析,在主要并发症、原发性无功能、再移植、肝动脉血栓、肾替代治疗需求、重症监护室和住院时间等方面没有明显差异。在这项研究中,HOPE 在降低胆道并发症、胆道狭窄和早期移植物功能障碍的发生率方面具有显著的统计学差异。要彻底阐明这种器官保存技术的影响,还需要进一步的研究来评估经济负担和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of hypothermic hyperoxygenated perfusion compared to static cold storage for liver transplant. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background

While liver transplant effectiveness in treating life-limiting liver disease is uncontested, challenges remain in organ preservation.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed to determine the impact of Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) on liver transplant outcomes compared to static cold storage (SCS).

Results

A total of five studies were included, totaling 586 patients, out of which 267 patients had HOPE-preserved grafts and 319 SCS-preserved grafts. Analysis showed a significant decrease in early graft dysfunction and biliary complications in the HOPE group when compared to SCS (RR = 0.52; 95 % CI = 0.33–0.81]; p = 0.01) (RR = 0.75; 95 % CI = [0.60–0.94]; p = 0.02), respectively. Similarly, non-anastomotic biliary strictures were significantly reduced in the HOPE group (RR = 0.41; 95 % CI = [0.20–0.86]; p = 0.03). Of note, no statistical significance was found on the one-year graft loss and recipient death (RR = 0.40; 95 % CI = [0.09–1.83]; p = 0.12 and RR = 0.62; 95 % CI = [0.29–1.32]; p = 0.14, respectively). Likewise, no statistical difference was evident in acute rejection (RR = 0.54; 95 % CI = [0.04–7.14]; p = 0.20) and postreperfusion syndrome rate (RR = 0.92; 95 % CI = [0.35–2.41]; p = 0.73). After statistical analysis, no significant differences in major complications, primary nonfunction, re-transplantation, hepatic artery thrombosis, need for renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit, and hospital length of stay were evident.

Conclusions

Liver preservation techniques are gaining popularity by enabling rescue and transplantation of marginal livers. In this study, HOPE showed statistically significant differences in reducing rates of biliary complications, biliary stricture, and early graft dysfunction. Further studies are needed to evaluate financial burden and long-term outcomes to completely elucidate the impact of this organ preservation technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular evidence of solitary lung metastasis as the initial recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma a decade more after liver transplantation Incidental hepatocellular carcinoma in explanted livers: Prevalence, prognosis and features Editorial board Contents Immunotherapy in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A comprehensive review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1