{"title":"解剖型全肩关节置换术中的骨小梁金属背板:平均十年后的结果","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>First-generation trabecular metal (TM) backed glenoids reported poor implant survival and were recalled from the market. Second generation TM glenoids have demonstrated promising findings at short- and mid-term follow-up. In our study, we report on clinical and radiographic outcomes of TM glenoids with an average of 10 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The charts of 14 TM glenoid patients with minimum 5 years follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end points included implant survival, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, radiographic data (metal debris, lateral humeral offset (LHO), acromiohumeral interval (AHI)) were studied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 11 years and the mean follow-up time was 10 ± 3 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Range of motion improved significantly following surgery. Forward elevation changed from 120 ± 22º preoperatively to 155 ± 13º postoperatively (</span><em>P</em> < .01). The mean external rotation showed a statistically significant increase from 19 ± 30º preoperatively to 54 ± 13º postoperatively (<em>P</em> < .01). Internal rotation improved six vertebral levels on average (<em>P</em> < .01). Pain levels decreased significantly from 7 ± 1 to 2 ± 2 (<em>P</em> < .01) while American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores increased from 35 ± 10 to 83 ± 21 (<em>P</em> < .01). Simple Shoulder Test scores demonstrated an improvement from 5 ± 3 to 10 ± 3 (<em>P</em> < .01). No patients had glenoid loosening, metal debris, or radioluency on radiographic imaging. The immediate LHO was 18 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9) and final LHO of 16 (SD ± 8) (<em>P</em> value = .01). The immediate AHI was 12 (SD ± 3) and final AHI was 11 (SD ± 3) (<em>P</em> value = .01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TM backed glenoids should remain in the modern orthopedic surgeon’s armamentarium of procedures. This particular glenoid design showed 100% implant survival at a decade following surgery, and provided sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function in osteoarthritic patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 657-662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trabecular metal backed glenoids in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes after a decade on average\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>First-generation trabecular metal (TM) backed glenoids reported poor implant survival and were recalled from the market. Second generation TM glenoids have demonstrated promising findings at short- and mid-term follow-up. In our study, we report on clinical and radiographic outcomes of TM glenoids with an average of 10 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The charts of 14 TM glenoid patients with minimum 5 years follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end points included implant survival, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, radiographic data (metal debris, lateral humeral offset (LHO), acromiohumeral interval (AHI)) were studied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 11 years and the mean follow-up time was 10 ± 3 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Range of motion improved significantly following surgery. Forward elevation changed from 120 ± 22º preoperatively to 155 ± 13º postoperatively (</span><em>P</em> < .01). The mean external rotation showed a statistically significant increase from 19 ± 30º preoperatively to 54 ± 13º postoperatively (<em>P</em> < .01). Internal rotation improved six vertebral levels on average (<em>P</em> < .01). Pain levels decreased significantly from 7 ± 1 to 2 ± 2 (<em>P</em> < .01) while American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores increased from 35 ± 10 to 83 ± 21 (<em>P</em> < .01). Simple Shoulder Test scores demonstrated an improvement from 5 ± 3 to 10 ± 3 (<em>P</em> < .01). No patients had glenoid loosening, metal debris, or radioluency on radiographic imaging. The immediate LHO was 18 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9) and final LHO of 16 (SD ± 8) (<em>P</em> value = .01). The immediate AHI was 12 (SD ± 3) and final AHI was 11 (SD ± 3) (<em>P</em> value = .01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TM backed glenoids should remain in the modern orthopedic surgeon’s armamentarium of procedures. This particular glenoid design showed 100% implant survival at a decade following surgery, and provided sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function in osteoarthritic patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 657-662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trabecular metal backed glenoids in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes after a decade on average
Background
First-generation trabecular metal (TM) backed glenoids reported poor implant survival and were recalled from the market. Second generation TM glenoids have demonstrated promising findings at short- and mid-term follow-up. In our study, we report on clinical and radiographic outcomes of TM glenoids with an average of 10 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Methods
The charts of 14 TM glenoid patients with minimum 5 years follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end points included implant survival, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, radiographic data (metal debris, lateral humeral offset (LHO), acromiohumeral interval (AHI)) were studied.
Results
The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 11 years and the mean follow-up time was 10 ± 3 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Range of motion improved significantly following surgery. Forward elevation changed from 120 ± 22º preoperatively to 155 ± 13º postoperatively (P < .01). The mean external rotation showed a statistically significant increase from 19 ± 30º preoperatively to 54 ± 13º postoperatively (P < .01). Internal rotation improved six vertebral levels on average (P < .01). Pain levels decreased significantly from 7 ± 1 to 2 ± 2 (P < .01) while American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores increased from 35 ± 10 to 83 ± 21 (P < .01). Simple Shoulder Test scores demonstrated an improvement from 5 ± 3 to 10 ± 3 (P < .01). No patients had glenoid loosening, metal debris, or radioluency on radiographic imaging. The immediate LHO was 18 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9) and final LHO of 16 (SD ± 8) (P value = .01). The immediate AHI was 12 (SD ± 3) and final AHI was 11 (SD ± 3) (P value = .01).
Conclusion
TM backed glenoids should remain in the modern orthopedic surgeon’s armamentarium of procedures. This particular glenoid design showed 100% implant survival at a decade following surgery, and provided sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function in osteoarthritic patients.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.