解剖型全肩关节置换术中的骨小梁金属背板:平均十年后的结果

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.013
{"title":"解剖型全肩关节置换术中的骨小梁金属背板:平均十年后的结果","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>First-generation trabecular metal (TM) backed glenoids reported poor implant survival and were recalled from the market. Second generation TM glenoids have demonstrated promising findings at short- and mid-term follow-up. In our study, we report on clinical and radiographic outcomes of TM glenoids with an average of 10 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The charts of 14 TM glenoid patients with minimum 5 years follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end points included implant survival, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, radiographic data (metal debris, lateral humeral offset (LHO), acromiohumeral interval (AHI)) were studied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 11 years and the mean follow-up time was 10 ± 3 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Range of motion improved significantly following surgery. Forward elevation changed from 120 ± 22º preoperatively to 155 ± 13º postoperatively (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .01). The mean external rotation showed a statistically significant increase from 19 ± 30º preoperatively to 54 ± 13º postoperatively (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Internal rotation improved six vertebral levels on average (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Pain levels decreased significantly from 7 ± 1 to 2 ± 2 (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) while American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores increased from 35 ± 10 to 83 ± 21 (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Simple Shoulder Test scores demonstrated an improvement from 5 ± 3 to 10 ± 3 (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). No patients had glenoid loosening, metal debris, or radioluency on radiographic imaging. The immediate LHO was 18 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9) and final LHO of 16 (SD ± 8) (<em>P</em> value = .01). The immediate AHI was 12 (SD ± 3) and final AHI was 11 (SD ± 3) (<em>P</em> value = .01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TM backed glenoids should remain in the modern orthopedic surgeon’s armamentarium of procedures. This particular glenoid design showed 100% implant survival at a decade following surgery, and provided sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function in osteoarthritic patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 657-662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trabecular metal backed glenoids in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes after a decade on average\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>First-generation trabecular metal (TM) backed glenoids reported poor implant survival and were recalled from the market. Second generation TM glenoids have demonstrated promising findings at short- and mid-term follow-up. In our study, we report on clinical and radiographic outcomes of TM glenoids with an average of 10 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The charts of 14 TM glenoid patients with minimum 5 years follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end points included implant survival, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, radiographic data (metal debris, lateral humeral offset (LHO), acromiohumeral interval (AHI)) were studied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 11 years and the mean follow-up time was 10 ± 3 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Range of motion improved significantly following surgery. Forward elevation changed from 120 ± 22º preoperatively to 155 ± 13º postoperatively (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .01). The mean external rotation showed a statistically significant increase from 19 ± 30º preoperatively to 54 ± 13º postoperatively (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Internal rotation improved six vertebral levels on average (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Pain levels decreased significantly from 7 ± 1 to 2 ± 2 (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) while American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores increased from 35 ± 10 to 83 ± 21 (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Simple Shoulder Test scores demonstrated an improvement from 5 ± 3 to 10 ± 3 (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). No patients had glenoid loosening, metal debris, or radioluency on radiographic imaging. The immediate LHO was 18 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9) and final LHO of 16 (SD ± 8) (<em>P</em> value = .01). The immediate AHI was 12 (SD ± 3) and final AHI was 11 (SD ± 3) (<em>P</em> value = .01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TM backed glenoids should remain in the modern orthopedic surgeon’s armamentarium of procedures. This particular glenoid design showed 100% implant survival at a decade following surgery, and provided sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function in osteoarthritic patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 657-662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景据报道,第一代小梁金属(TM)背衬式玻璃假体的植入存活率很低,并从市场上召回。第二代小梁金属义齿在短期和中期随访中显示出良好的效果。在我们的研究中,我们报告了平均 10 年临床和放射学随访的 TM 人工晶状体的临床和放射学结果。方法回顾性分析了 14 位至少随访 5 年的 TM 人工晶状体患者的病历。主要终点包括植入物存活率、活动范围和患者报告的结果。此外,还研究了放射学数据(金属碎片、肱骨外侧偏移(LHO)、肱骨肩峰间距(AHI))。假体存活率为100%。术后活动范围明显改善。前倾从术前的 120 ± 22º 变为术后的 155 ± 13º (P < .01)。平均外旋度从术前的 19 ± 30º 增加到术后的 54 ± 13º(P <.01),差异有统计学意义。内旋平均改善了六个椎体水平(P <.01)。疼痛程度从 7 ± 1 显著降至 2 ± 2(P < .01),而美国肩肘外科医生肩关节评分从 35 ± 10 上升至 83 ± 21(P < .01)。简单肩关节测试评分从 5 ± 3 分提高到 10 ± 3 分(P < .01)。在放射影像学检查中,没有患者出现盂状松动、金属碎屑或放射性肿块。即时 LHO 为 18(标准差 [SD] ± 9),最终 LHO 为 16(标准差 ± 8)(P 值 = .01)。即时 AHI 为 12(标准差±3),最终 AHI 为 11(标准差±3)(P 值 = 0.01)。这种特殊的盂兰盆设计在术后十年内显示出 100% 的植入存活率,并能持续改善骨关节炎患者的活动范围和肩关节功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trabecular metal backed glenoids in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes after a decade on average

Background

First-generation trabecular metal (TM) backed glenoids reported poor implant survival and were recalled from the market. Second generation TM glenoids have demonstrated promising findings at short- and mid-term follow-up. In our study, we report on clinical and radiographic outcomes of TM glenoids with an average of 10 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Methods

The charts of 14 TM glenoid patients with minimum 5 years follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end points included implant survival, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, radiographic data (metal debris, lateral humeral offset (LHO), acromiohumeral interval (AHI)) were studied.

Results

The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 11 years and the mean follow-up time was 10 ± 3 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Range of motion improved significantly following surgery. Forward elevation changed from 120 ± 22º preoperatively to 155 ± 13º postoperatively (P < .01). The mean external rotation showed a statistically significant increase from 19 ± 30º preoperatively to 54 ± 13º postoperatively (P < .01). Internal rotation improved six vertebral levels on average (P < .01). Pain levels decreased significantly from 7 ± 1 to 2 ± 2 (P < .01) while American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores increased from 35 ± 10 to 83 ± 21 (P < .01). Simple Shoulder Test scores demonstrated an improvement from 5 ± 3 to 10 ± 3 (P < .01). No patients had glenoid loosening, metal debris, or radioluency on radiographic imaging. The immediate LHO was 18 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9) and final LHO of 16 (SD ± 8) (P value = .01). The immediate AHI was 12 (SD ± 3) and final AHI was 11 (SD ± 3) (P value = .01).

Conclusion

TM backed glenoids should remain in the modern orthopedic surgeon’s armamentarium of procedures. This particular glenoid design showed 100% implant survival at a decade following surgery, and provided sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function in osteoarthritic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Comparing comorbidity burden between patients undergoing ambulatory rotator cuff repair vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS for ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS following shoulder arthroplasty does not correlate with patient satisfaction Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using hybrid glenoid fixation with a porous-coated titanium post. Two- to ten-year follow-up of 256 cases with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1