外科医生进行乳腺癌术中超声引导线定位的安全性和边缘阳性率

Tess Huy, Danielle S. Graham, Jennifer L. Baker, Carlie K. Thompson, Courtney Smith, Anouchka Coste Holt, Nimmi S. Kapoor
{"title":"外科医生进行乳腺癌术中超声引导线定位的安全性和边缘阳性率","authors":"Tess Huy,&nbsp;Danielle S. Graham,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Baker,&nbsp;Carlie K. Thompson,&nbsp;Courtney Smith,&nbsp;Anouchka Coste Holt,&nbsp;Nimmi S. Kapoor","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Surgeon-performed intraoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization (IOL) offers an improved patient experience and decreased cost compared to preoperative localization by radiology, yet literature on this technique is sparse. Here we evaluate the safety and margin positivity rate after surgeon-performed IOL for breast cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with biopsy-proven breast malignancy and planned breast conservation who underwent IOL by a single breast surgeon between 2017–2023 and had follow-up at our institution were retrospectively identified. Patient and tumor characteristics, method of diagnosis, imaging findings, use of oncoplastic surgery, and follow-up data were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 137 IOLs were performed for biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer. The median patient age was 69 years. Most patients had a non-palpable tumor (n = 104, 76.5%). 84.6% of patients underwent pre-operative biopsy by ultrasound guidance, 12.5% by stereotactic guidance, and 2.9% by MRI. In total, 7.3% of patients (n = 10) had positive margins, including 2 with invasive disease at the margin and 8 with DCIS at the margin. Nine patients underwent re-excision for positive or close margins, of which 8 had successful margin-negative breast conservation and 1 patient underwent mastectomy. Thirty-day postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (15.3%). Of these, most (n = 19, 90.4%) had minor complications including seroma (n = 14), cellulitis (n = 3), and skin allergy (n = 2). At median follow-up of 20.4 months, no patients experienced recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our single-surgeon series, IOL is a safe technique for localization of invasive carcinoma and DCIS with margin positivity, re-excision, and postoperative complication rates within previously published ranges.</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>This study evaluates the safety of and re-excision rates after intraoperative surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided wire localization (IOL) for breast cancer. Results demonstrate margin positivity and re-excision rates equivalent to or lower than rates reported in literature utilizing preoperative localization techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000665/pdfft?md5=410eec1a825577583e3a8e9c7c2f0985&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000665-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and margin positivity rates of surgeon-performed intraoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization for breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"Tess Huy,&nbsp;Danielle S. Graham,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Baker,&nbsp;Carlie K. Thompson,&nbsp;Courtney Smith,&nbsp;Anouchka Coste Holt,&nbsp;Nimmi S. Kapoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Surgeon-performed intraoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization (IOL) offers an improved patient experience and decreased cost compared to preoperative localization by radiology, yet literature on this technique is sparse. Here we evaluate the safety and margin positivity rate after surgeon-performed IOL for breast cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with biopsy-proven breast malignancy and planned breast conservation who underwent IOL by a single breast surgeon between 2017–2023 and had follow-up at our institution were retrospectively identified. Patient and tumor characteristics, method of diagnosis, imaging findings, use of oncoplastic surgery, and follow-up data were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 137 IOLs were performed for biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer. The median patient age was 69 years. Most patients had a non-palpable tumor (n = 104, 76.5%). 84.6% of patients underwent pre-operative biopsy by ultrasound guidance, 12.5% by stereotactic guidance, and 2.9% by MRI. In total, 7.3% of patients (n = 10) had positive margins, including 2 with invasive disease at the margin and 8 with DCIS at the margin. Nine patients underwent re-excision for positive or close margins, of which 8 had successful margin-negative breast conservation and 1 patient underwent mastectomy. Thirty-day postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (15.3%). Of these, most (n = 19, 90.4%) had minor complications including seroma (n = 14), cellulitis (n = 3), and skin allergy (n = 2). At median follow-up of 20.4 months, no patients experienced recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our single-surgeon series, IOL is a safe technique for localization of invasive carcinoma and DCIS with margin positivity, re-excision, and postoperative complication rates within previously published ranges.</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>This study evaluates the safety of and re-excision rates after intraoperative surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided wire localization (IOL) for breast cancer. Results demonstrate margin positivity and re-excision rates equivalent to or lower than rates reported in literature utilizing preoperative localization techniques.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000665/pdfft?md5=410eec1a825577583e3a8e9c7c2f0985&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000665-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology Insight\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与放射科术前定位相比,由外科医生实施的术中超声引导线定位(IOL)可改善患者体验并降低成本,但有关该技术的文献很少。在此,我们对乳腺癌外科医生实施 IOL 后的安全性和边缘阳性率进行了评估。方法回顾性地确定了在 2017-2023 年间由一名乳腺外科医生实施 IOL 并在我院进行随访的活检证实为乳腺恶性肿瘤且计划保乳的患者。对患者和肿瘤特征、诊断方法、成像结果、肿瘤整形手术的使用以及随访数据进行了分析。结果 共有137例经活检证实为乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)或浸润癌的患者接受了IOL手术。患者年龄中位数为 69 岁。大多数患者的肿瘤无法触及(104 人,76.5%)。84.6%的患者通过超声引导进行术前活检,12.5%通过立体定向引导,2.9%通过磁共振成像。共有7.3%的患者(10人)边缘阳性,其中2人边缘有浸润性病变,8人边缘有DCIS。9名患者因边缘阳性或接近边缘而接受了再次切除术,其中8名患者成功保留了边缘阴性的乳房,1名患者接受了乳房切除术。21 名患者(15.3%)出现了术后 30 天并发症。其中大部分(19 例,90.4%)为轻微并发症,包括血清肿(14 例)、蜂窝组织炎(3 例)和皮肤过敏(2 例)。在中位 20.4 个月的随访中,没有患者复发。结论在我们的单个外科医生系列中,IOL 是一种安全的浸润癌和 DCIS 定位技术,其边缘阳性率、再次切除率和术后并发症发生率均在之前公布的范围内。结果显示,边缘阳性率和再次切除率相当于或低于使用术前定位技术的文献报道率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and margin positivity rates of surgeon-performed intraoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization for breast cancer

Background

Surgeon-performed intraoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization (IOL) offers an improved patient experience and decreased cost compared to preoperative localization by radiology, yet literature on this technique is sparse. Here we evaluate the safety and margin positivity rate after surgeon-performed IOL for breast cancer.

Methods

Patients with biopsy-proven breast malignancy and planned breast conservation who underwent IOL by a single breast surgeon between 2017–2023 and had follow-up at our institution were retrospectively identified. Patient and tumor characteristics, method of diagnosis, imaging findings, use of oncoplastic surgery, and follow-up data were analyzed.

Results

A total of 137 IOLs were performed for biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer. The median patient age was 69 years. Most patients had a non-palpable tumor (n = 104, 76.5%). 84.6% of patients underwent pre-operative biopsy by ultrasound guidance, 12.5% by stereotactic guidance, and 2.9% by MRI. In total, 7.3% of patients (n = 10) had positive margins, including 2 with invasive disease at the margin and 8 with DCIS at the margin. Nine patients underwent re-excision for positive or close margins, of which 8 had successful margin-negative breast conservation and 1 patient underwent mastectomy. Thirty-day postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (15.3%). Of these, most (n = 19, 90.4%) had minor complications including seroma (n = 14), cellulitis (n = 3), and skin allergy (n = 2). At median follow-up of 20.4 months, no patients experienced recurrence.

Conclusions

In our single-surgeon series, IOL is a safe technique for localization of invasive carcinoma and DCIS with margin positivity, re-excision, and postoperative complication rates within previously published ranges.

Synopsis

This study evaluates the safety of and re-excision rates after intraoperative surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided wire localization (IOL) for breast cancer. Results demonstrate margin positivity and re-excision rates equivalent to or lower than rates reported in literature utilizing preoperative localization techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions Timing of breast biopsy and axillary ultrasound does not affect the false positive rate of the axillary ultrasound Small bowel cancers: A population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcomes in Ontario, Canada from 2005-2020 Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Prehabilitation (PrePFPT) for the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome Pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori: Serum biomarkers for gastric cancer risk in a diverse United States population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1