Sexual dimorphism in peri-articular tissue anatomy – More keys to understanding sex-differences in osteoarthritis?

Objective

Osteoarthritis prevalence differs between women and men; whether this is the result of differences in pre-morbid articular or peri-articular anatomical morphotypes remains enigmatic. Albeit sex within humans cannot be reduced to female/male, this review focusses to the sexual dimorphism of peri-articular tissues, given lack of literature on non-binary subjects.

Methods

Based on a Pubmed search and input from experts, we selected relevant articles based on the authors’ judgement of relevance, interest, and quality; no “hard” bibliometric measures were used to evaluate the quality or importance of the work. Emphasis was on clinical studies, with most (imaging) data being available for the knee and thigh.

Results

The literature on sexual dimorphism of peri-articular tissues is reviewed: 1) bone size/shape, 2) subchondral/subarticular bone, 3) synovial membrane and infra-patellar fad-pad (IPFP), 4) muscle/adipose tissue, and 5) peri-articular tissue response to treatment.

Conclusions

Relevant sex-specific differences exist for 3D bone shape and IPFP size, even after normalization to body weight. Presence of effusion- and Hoffa-synovitis is associated with greater risk of incident knee osteoarthritis in overweight women, but not in men. When normalized to bone size, men exhibit greater muscle, and women greater adipose tissue measures relative to the opposite sex. Reduced thigh muscle specific strength is associated with incident knee osteoarthritis and knee replacement in women, but not in men. These observations may explain why women with muscle strength deficits have a poorer prognosis than men with similar deficits. A “one size/sex fits all” approach must be urgently abandoned in osteoarthritis research.