ahmed aly khalifa, M. Ameen, Mostafa Abdelkhalek, mohammed khalafalla, Mahmoud Mousa, Wael Amer
{"title":"治疗早期子宫内膜癌的全腹腔镜子宫切除术和腹腔镜淋巴腺切除术与传统的腹腔镜子宫切除术和淋巴腺切除术:前瞻性随机研究","authors":"ahmed aly khalifa, M. Ameen, Mostafa Abdelkhalek, mohammed khalafalla, Mahmoud Mousa, Wael Amer","doi":"10.21608/smj.2024.251858.1430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: Endometrial cancer is the commonest gynecological neoplasm in developed nations. The current study aimed at comparing, in a series of females the usefulness, security as well as morbidity of total Laparoscopic and Laparoscopic for early-stage EC. Methods: This prospective randomized study of 50 females with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma. cases were classified into 2 equal groups: group 1 was managed by total LPS, and group 2 were treated with Laparoscopic. At admission, each woman was subjected to a gynecological and rectal examination, US and hysteroscopic evaluation. biopsies from the endometrium, chest X-ray, and MRI and/ or CT scan. LN dissection was done in selected patients in both groups. Results: Characteristics of the studied groups (Hb decline, blood loss and time of postoperative ileus) revealed significant reduction in the Laparoscopic group in comparison with Laparoscopic group. The incidence of fever revealed a significant decrease in Laparoscopic group compared to Laparoscopic group as well. Hospital stay and operative time were insignificantly different between the studied groups. The incidence of fever was significantly lower in Laparoscopic group compared to Laparoscopic group. Complications including (bladder and ureteric injuries, conversion to laparotomy, missed intestinal injury, postoperative hematoma, and wound infection) were insignificantly different between the studied groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopy is an appropriate method in treating early endometrial carcinoma .","PeriodicalId":254383,"journal":{"name":"Sohag Medical Journal","volume":"8 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Abdominal Hysterectomy with Lymphadenectomy for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Study\",\"authors\":\"ahmed aly khalifa, M. Ameen, Mostafa Abdelkhalek, mohammed khalafalla, Mahmoud Mousa, Wael Amer\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/smj.2024.251858.1430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Background: Endometrial cancer is the commonest gynecological neoplasm in developed nations. The current study aimed at comparing, in a series of females the usefulness, security as well as morbidity of total Laparoscopic and Laparoscopic for early-stage EC. Methods: This prospective randomized study of 50 females with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma. cases were classified into 2 equal groups: group 1 was managed by total LPS, and group 2 were treated with Laparoscopic. At admission, each woman was subjected to a gynecological and rectal examination, US and hysteroscopic evaluation. biopsies from the endometrium, chest X-ray, and MRI and/ or CT scan. LN dissection was done in selected patients in both groups. Results: Characteristics of the studied groups (Hb decline, blood loss and time of postoperative ileus) revealed significant reduction in the Laparoscopic group in comparison with Laparoscopic group. The incidence of fever revealed a significant decrease in Laparoscopic group compared to Laparoscopic group as well. Hospital stay and operative time were insignificantly different between the studied groups. The incidence of fever was significantly lower in Laparoscopic group compared to Laparoscopic group. Complications including (bladder and ureteric injuries, conversion to laparotomy, missed intestinal injury, postoperative hematoma, and wound infection) were insignificantly different between the studied groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopy is an appropriate method in treating early endometrial carcinoma .\",\"PeriodicalId\":254383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sohag Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 28\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sohag Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/smj.2024.251858.1430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sohag Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/smj.2024.251858.1430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
:背景:子宫内膜癌是发达国家最常见的妇科肿瘤。本研究旨在比较全腹腔镜和腹腔镜治疗早期子宫内膜癌的实用性、安全性和发病率。方法:将病例分为两组:第一组采用全腹腔镜手术,第二组采用腹腔镜手术。入院时,每位女性都要接受妇科和直肠检查、美国和宫腔镜评估、子宫内膜活检、胸部 X 光检查、核磁共振成像和/或 CT 扫描。两组患者中均有选择地进行了 LN 切除术。结果研究组的特征(血红蛋白下降、失血量和术后回肠梗阻时间)显示,腹腔镜组比腹腔镜组明显减少。腹腔镜组与腹腔镜组相比,发热发生率也明显下降。研究组之间的住院时间和手术时间差异不大。腹腔镜组的发热发生率明显低于腹腔镜组。并发症(膀胱和输尿管损伤、转为开腹手术、肠道损伤、术后血肿和伤口感染)在研究组之间差异不大。结论腹腔镜是治疗早期子宫内膜癌的合适方法。
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Abdominal Hysterectomy with Lymphadenectomy for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Study
: Background: Endometrial cancer is the commonest gynecological neoplasm in developed nations. The current study aimed at comparing, in a series of females the usefulness, security as well as morbidity of total Laparoscopic and Laparoscopic for early-stage EC. Methods: This prospective randomized study of 50 females with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma. cases were classified into 2 equal groups: group 1 was managed by total LPS, and group 2 were treated with Laparoscopic. At admission, each woman was subjected to a gynecological and rectal examination, US and hysteroscopic evaluation. biopsies from the endometrium, chest X-ray, and MRI and/ or CT scan. LN dissection was done in selected patients in both groups. Results: Characteristics of the studied groups (Hb decline, blood loss and time of postoperative ileus) revealed significant reduction in the Laparoscopic group in comparison with Laparoscopic group. The incidence of fever revealed a significant decrease in Laparoscopic group compared to Laparoscopic group as well. Hospital stay and operative time were insignificantly different between the studied groups. The incidence of fever was significantly lower in Laparoscopic group compared to Laparoscopic group. Complications including (bladder and ureteric injuries, conversion to laparotomy, missed intestinal injury, postoperative hematoma, and wound infection) were insignificantly different between the studied groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopy is an appropriate method in treating early endometrial carcinoma .