由运动生理学家通过远程医疗提供疼痛科学指导,改善人寿保险索赔人的疼痛和功能:一项实用队列研究

Dr Vicky Phillips, D. N. Mundell, Mr Chris Sinclair, Dr. Patrick Owen
{"title":"由运动生理学家通过远程医疗提供疼痛科学指导,改善人寿保险索赔人的疼痛和功能:一项实用队列研究","authors":"Dr Vicky Phillips, D. N. Mundell, Mr Chris Sinclair, Dr. Patrick Owen","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Personal injury and illness compensation claimants are more likely to experience persistent pain and poorer clinical/vocational outcomes than non-compensated clients. Evidence supports the effectiveness of pain science coaching to help people understand and re-train their pain system. This consequently reduces pain intensity, improves function and quality of life. However, the effectiveness of telehealth-delivered, exercise physiologist-led pain science coaching is yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of an accredited exercise physiologist-led pain science coaching intervention via telehealth in Australian life insurance claimants.\n \n \n \n This pragmatic cohort study included 1,275 claimants receiving a pain science coaching intervention supported by life insurance compensation. Ethics was approved via Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2023-347). Outcome measures were pain intensity (11 item numerical pain rating scale, range: 0-10 points) and function (two 11-item patient-specific functional scale, range: 0-20 points). Linear mixed models determined within-group change over time.\n \n \n \n Clients (female: 75%, male: 25%) had a mean (SD) age of 50 (10) years (range: 20-69 years) and claim duration of 2 (2) years (range: 0-20 years). Mean (SD) intervention duration was 10 (6) weeks (range: 3-41 weeks), financial cost was A$1,149 (A$202; range: A$510-A$2,040) and included 5 (1) hours (range: 2-11 hours) of pain science coaching. Following the intervention, pain intensity decreased 25% (estimated marginal mean change [95%CI]: -1.49 [-1.59, -1.40] points, P<0.001) and function increased 76% (4.41 [4.21, 4.62] points, P<0.001). Changes surpassed established clinically meaningful effect thresholds for pain intensity (1.17 points) and function (2.6 points). Client Net Promotor Score was +60 (Australian Healthcare Index benchmark ≥ +30) and 91% were satisfied with the intervention.\n \n \n \n An exercise physiologist-led pain science coaching intervention resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity and function in compensation claimants. Clients reported high satisfaction rates.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGIST-LED PAIN SCIENCE COACHING VIA TELEHEALTH IMPROVED PAIN AND FUNCTION IN LIFE INSURANCE CLAIMANTS: A PRAGMATIC COHORT STUDY\",\"authors\":\"Dr Vicky Phillips, D. N. Mundell, Mr Chris Sinclair, Dr. Patrick Owen\",\"doi\":\"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Personal injury and illness compensation claimants are more likely to experience persistent pain and poorer clinical/vocational outcomes than non-compensated clients. Evidence supports the effectiveness of pain science coaching to help people understand and re-train their pain system. This consequently reduces pain intensity, improves function and quality of life. However, the effectiveness of telehealth-delivered, exercise physiologist-led pain science coaching is yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of an accredited exercise physiologist-led pain science coaching intervention via telehealth in Australian life insurance claimants.\\n \\n \\n \\n This pragmatic cohort study included 1,275 claimants receiving a pain science coaching intervention supported by life insurance compensation. Ethics was approved via Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2023-347). Outcome measures were pain intensity (11 item numerical pain rating scale, range: 0-10 points) and function (two 11-item patient-specific functional scale, range: 0-20 points). Linear mixed models determined within-group change over time.\\n \\n \\n \\n Clients (female: 75%, male: 25%) had a mean (SD) age of 50 (10) years (range: 20-69 years) and claim duration of 2 (2) years (range: 0-20 years). Mean (SD) intervention duration was 10 (6) weeks (range: 3-41 weeks), financial cost was A$1,149 (A$202; range: A$510-A$2,040) and included 5 (1) hours (range: 2-11 hours) of pain science coaching. Following the intervention, pain intensity decreased 25% (estimated marginal mean change [95%CI]: -1.49 [-1.59, -1.40] points, P<0.001) and function increased 76% (4.41 [4.21, 4.62] points, P<0.001). Changes surpassed established clinically meaningful effect thresholds for pain intensity (1.17 points) and function (2.6 points). Client Net Promotor Score was +60 (Australian Healthcare Index benchmark ≥ +30) and 91% were satisfied with the intervention.\\n \\n \\n \\n An exercise physiologist-led pain science coaching intervention resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity and function in compensation claimants. Clients reported high satisfaction rates.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":92070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical exercise physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与未获得赔偿的客户相比,人身伤害和疾病赔偿申请人更有可能经历持续疼痛和较差的临床/职业结果。有证据表明,疼痛科学辅导能有效帮助人们了解并重新训练他们的疼痛系统。这将降低疼痛强度、改善功能和生活质量。然而,由运动生理学家主导的远程医疗疼痛科学指导的有效性还有待评估。本研究旨在确定通过远程保健对澳大利亚人寿保险理赔者进行经认可的运动生理学家主导的疼痛科学指导干预的有效性。 这项务实的队列研究包括 1275 名接受由人寿保险赔偿支持的疼痛科学指导干预的索赔人。迪肯大学人类研究伦理委员会(Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee,2023-347)批准了这项伦理研究。结果测量为疼痛强度(11 项数字疼痛评分量表,范围:0-10 分)和功能(两项 11 项患者特定功能评分量表,范围:0-20 分)。线性混合模型确定组内随时间的变化。 客户(女性:75%,男性:25%)的平均(标清)年龄为 50(10)岁(范围:20-69 岁),索赔持续时间为 2(2)年(范围:0-20 年)。平均(标清)干预持续时间为 10 (6) 周(范围:3-41 周),经济成本为 1,149 澳元(202 澳元;范围:510-2,040 澳元),包括 5 (1) 小时(范围:2-11 小时)的疼痛科学指导。干预后,疼痛强度降低了 25%(估计边际平均变化 [95%CI]: -1.49 [-1.59, -1.40] 点,P<0.001),功能提高了 76% (4.41 [4.21, 4.62] 点,P<0.001)。疼痛强度(1.17 分)和功能(2.6 分)的变化超过了既定的有临床意义的效果阈值。客户净促进得分为 +60(澳大利亚保健指数基准≥ +30),91% 的人对干预措施表示满意。 以运动生理学家为主导的疼痛科学指导干预措施使索赔者的疼痛强度和功能得到了有临床意义的改善。客户的满意度很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGIST-LED PAIN SCIENCE COACHING VIA TELEHEALTH IMPROVED PAIN AND FUNCTION IN LIFE INSURANCE CLAIMANTS: A PRAGMATIC COHORT STUDY
Personal injury and illness compensation claimants are more likely to experience persistent pain and poorer clinical/vocational outcomes than non-compensated clients. Evidence supports the effectiveness of pain science coaching to help people understand and re-train their pain system. This consequently reduces pain intensity, improves function and quality of life. However, the effectiveness of telehealth-delivered, exercise physiologist-led pain science coaching is yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of an accredited exercise physiologist-led pain science coaching intervention via telehealth in Australian life insurance claimants. This pragmatic cohort study included 1,275 claimants receiving a pain science coaching intervention supported by life insurance compensation. Ethics was approved via Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2023-347). Outcome measures were pain intensity (11 item numerical pain rating scale, range: 0-10 points) and function (two 11-item patient-specific functional scale, range: 0-20 points). Linear mixed models determined within-group change over time. Clients (female: 75%, male: 25%) had a mean (SD) age of 50 (10) years (range: 20-69 years) and claim duration of 2 (2) years (range: 0-20 years). Mean (SD) intervention duration was 10 (6) weeks (range: 3-41 weeks), financial cost was A$1,149 (A$202; range: A$510-A$2,040) and included 5 (1) hours (range: 2-11 hours) of pain science coaching. Following the intervention, pain intensity decreased 25% (estimated marginal mean change [95%CI]: -1.49 [-1.59, -1.40] points, P<0.001) and function increased 76% (4.41 [4.21, 4.62] points, P<0.001). Changes surpassed established clinically meaningful effect thresholds for pain intensity (1.17 points) and function (2.6 points). Client Net Promotor Score was +60 (Australian Healthcare Index benchmark ≥ +30) and 91% were satisfied with the intervention. An exercise physiologist-led pain science coaching intervention resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity and function in compensation claimants. Clients reported high satisfaction rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of 12 Months of Kettlebell Training on an Individual with Myasthenia Gravis Effective Manuscript Writing: A Learned Process Cardiorespiratory Effects of Tai Chi Versus Walking: Exploratory Data from the LEAP Trial Stroke, Step Count, and Alzheimer’s ECG Characteristics of Young High School Athletes in Northwest Florida
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1