塞式喷嘴和拉瓦尔喷嘴对非预混旋转爆燃燃烧器流场和性能的影响

Yunzhen Zhang, Miao Cheng, Xiangyang Liu, Guangyao Rong, Zhaohua Sheng, D. Shen, Kewen Wu, Jianping Wang
{"title":"塞式喷嘴和拉瓦尔喷嘴对非预混旋转爆燃燃烧器流场和性能的影响","authors":"Yunzhen Zhang, Miao Cheng, Xiangyang Liu, Guangyao Rong, Zhaohua Sheng, D. Shen, Kewen Wu, Jianping Wang","doi":"10.1063/5.0207508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rotating detonation engine's (RDE) development to engineering applications, the selection and optimization of nozzle is garnering great concerns, with the aim to maximize the performance benefits of this pressure gain propulsion system. The present study represents the first effort to explore the distinct impacts of two commonly used nozzles in RDE, namely, the plug nozzle and the Laval nozzle, on the internal flow and performance within the combustion chamber. Three-dimensional numerical simulations are conducted on non-premixed annular RDEs with plug nozzles and Laval nozzles. It is found that the Laval nozzle induces a forward-leaning wavefront structure in the combustion chamber. Furthermore, the overall pressure gain of the RDE is divided into the injection pressure loss, the average pressure gain at the chamber bottom, and the flow losses downstream, by combining the wavefront coordinate averaged flow field, which is proposed and applied in this study, and laboratory coordinate averaged flow field. The results show that, for the performance of the combustion chamber, while Laval nozzles enhance pressure gains at the chamber bottom and reduce exit flow non-uniformity, they also increase downstream losses. By comparing the RDE performance with the ideal performance of deflagration-based combustors, it is found that the premixed control group exceeded the deflagration ideal performance by 30%. Despite lower combustion efficiency, non-premixed configurations nearly match the ideal deflagration performance, underscoring the inherent advantages of RDEs.","PeriodicalId":509470,"journal":{"name":"Physics of Fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of plug nozzle and Laval nozzle on the flow field and performance of non-premixed rotating detonation combustor\",\"authors\":\"Yunzhen Zhang, Miao Cheng, Xiangyang Liu, Guangyao Rong, Zhaohua Sheng, D. Shen, Kewen Wu, Jianping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0207508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the rotating detonation engine's (RDE) development to engineering applications, the selection and optimization of nozzle is garnering great concerns, with the aim to maximize the performance benefits of this pressure gain propulsion system. The present study represents the first effort to explore the distinct impacts of two commonly used nozzles in RDE, namely, the plug nozzle and the Laval nozzle, on the internal flow and performance within the combustion chamber. Three-dimensional numerical simulations are conducted on non-premixed annular RDEs with plug nozzles and Laval nozzles. It is found that the Laval nozzle induces a forward-leaning wavefront structure in the combustion chamber. Furthermore, the overall pressure gain of the RDE is divided into the injection pressure loss, the average pressure gain at the chamber bottom, and the flow losses downstream, by combining the wavefront coordinate averaged flow field, which is proposed and applied in this study, and laboratory coordinate averaged flow field. The results show that, for the performance of the combustion chamber, while Laval nozzles enhance pressure gains at the chamber bottom and reduce exit flow non-uniformity, they also increase downstream losses. By comparing the RDE performance with the ideal performance of deflagration-based combustors, it is found that the premixed control group exceeded the deflagration ideal performance by 30%. Despite lower combustion efficiency, non-premixed configurations nearly match the ideal deflagration performance, underscoring the inherent advantages of RDEs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics of Fluids\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics of Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0207508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0207508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着旋转爆轰发动机(RDE)向工程应用的发展,喷嘴的选择和优化备受关注,其目的是最大限度地提高这种压力增益推进系统的性能。本研究首次探讨了 RDE 中常用的两种喷嘴(即塞式喷嘴和拉瓦尔喷嘴)对燃烧室内部流动和性能的不同影响。我们对带有塞式喷嘴和拉瓦尔喷嘴的非预混合环形 RDE 进行了三维数值模拟。结果发现,拉瓦尔喷嘴会在燃烧室内形成前倾波面结构。此外,结合本研究提出并应用的波前坐标平均流场和实验室坐标平均流场,将 RDE 的整体压力增益分为喷射压力损失、燃烧室底部的平均压力增益和下游的流动损失。结果表明,就燃烧室的性能而言,虽然拉瓦尔喷嘴提高了燃烧室底部的压力增益并降低了出口流的不均匀性,但同时也增加了下游损失。通过将 RDE 性能与爆燃式燃烧器的理想性能进行比较,发现预混控制组比爆燃式理想性能高出 30%。尽管燃烧效率较低,但非预混合配置几乎达到了理想的爆燃性能,突出了 RDE 的固有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of plug nozzle and Laval nozzle on the flow field and performance of non-premixed rotating detonation combustor
With the rotating detonation engine's (RDE) development to engineering applications, the selection and optimization of nozzle is garnering great concerns, with the aim to maximize the performance benefits of this pressure gain propulsion system. The present study represents the first effort to explore the distinct impacts of two commonly used nozzles in RDE, namely, the plug nozzle and the Laval nozzle, on the internal flow and performance within the combustion chamber. Three-dimensional numerical simulations are conducted on non-premixed annular RDEs with plug nozzles and Laval nozzles. It is found that the Laval nozzle induces a forward-leaning wavefront structure in the combustion chamber. Furthermore, the overall pressure gain of the RDE is divided into the injection pressure loss, the average pressure gain at the chamber bottom, and the flow losses downstream, by combining the wavefront coordinate averaged flow field, which is proposed and applied in this study, and laboratory coordinate averaged flow field. The results show that, for the performance of the combustion chamber, while Laval nozzles enhance pressure gains at the chamber bottom and reduce exit flow non-uniformity, they also increase downstream losses. By comparing the RDE performance with the ideal performance of deflagration-based combustors, it is found that the premixed control group exceeded the deflagration ideal performance by 30%. Despite lower combustion efficiency, non-premixed configurations nearly match the ideal deflagration performance, underscoring the inherent advantages of RDEs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A unified macroscopic equation for creeping, inertial, transitional, and turbulent fluid flows through porous media Systematical study on the aerodynamic control mechanisms of a 1:2 rectangular cylinder with Kirigami scales Mathematical modeling of creeping electromagnetohydrodynamic peristaltic propulsion in an annular gap between sinusoidally deforming permeable and impermeable curved tubes Effect of diversion angle and vanes' skew angle on the hydro-morpho-dynamics of mobile-bed open-channel bifurcations controlled by submerged vane-fields Direct numerical simulations of pure and partially cracked ammonia/air turbulent premixed jet flames
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1