心理学循证实践:经常被误解的三方方法

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Pratiques Psychologiques Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prps.2024.03.005
Sacha Delphine Blause, Nancy Durieux, Ezio Tirelli, Sylvie Willems
{"title":"心理学循证实践:经常被误解的三方方法","authors":"Sacha Delphine Blause,&nbsp;Nancy Durieux,&nbsp;Ezio Tirelli,&nbsp;Sylvie Willems","doi":"10.1016/j.prps.2024.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an approach that encourages clinicians to base their clinical decisions on evidence (pillars) to improve the quality of patient care. However, the state of knowledge and practice of psychologists in French speaking Europe is still unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to find out what these psychologists know about EBP and whether they use it in their daily practice.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A questionnaire of 50 multiple-choice questions for French-speaking Belgian psychologists was posted online on social networks. The questions focused on psychologists’ knowledge and beliefs about EBP and the information that guides clinicians in their practice.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 110 psychologists responded to the survey. Only one third of the psychologists surveyed knew what PBA was. In their daily decision making, clinicians rely on past experience, accumulated knowledge and the difficulties presented by the patient, but scientific literature, patient preferences and opinions about treatment and expert opinions provide little guidance in their practice. Furthermore, perceived barriers, such as lack of knowledge and know-how, seem to prevent psychologists from using EBP in their daily practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A lack of knowledge of EBP among psychologists was revealed. Furthermore, the behaviours implemented in daily practice were not fully in line with the EBP. The survey data indicate that there is a need for more training for clinicians to improve their understanding of practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54590,"journal":{"name":"Pratiques Psychologiques","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 205-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’evidence-based practice en psychologie : une approche tripartite souvent mal comprise\",\"authors\":\"Sacha Delphine Blause,&nbsp;Nancy Durieux,&nbsp;Ezio Tirelli,&nbsp;Sylvie Willems\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prps.2024.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an approach that encourages clinicians to base their clinical decisions on evidence (pillars) to improve the quality of patient care. However, the state of knowledge and practice of psychologists in French speaking Europe is still unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to find out what these psychologists know about EBP and whether they use it in their daily practice.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A questionnaire of 50 multiple-choice questions for French-speaking Belgian psychologists was posted online on social networks. The questions focused on psychologists’ knowledge and beliefs about EBP and the information that guides clinicians in their practice.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 110 psychologists responded to the survey. Only one third of the psychologists surveyed knew what PBA was. In their daily decision making, clinicians rely on past experience, accumulated knowledge and the difficulties presented by the patient, but scientific literature, patient preferences and opinions about treatment and expert opinions provide little guidance in their practice. Furthermore, perceived barriers, such as lack of knowledge and know-how, seem to prevent psychologists from using EBP in their daily practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A lack of knowledge of EBP among psychologists was revealed. Furthermore, the behaviours implemented in daily practice were not fully in line with the EBP. The survey data indicate that there is a need for more training for clinicians to improve their understanding of practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 205-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176324000075\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pratiques Psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176324000075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
L’evidence-based practice en psychologie : une approche tripartite souvent mal comprise

Introduction

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an approach that encourages clinicians to base their clinical decisions on evidence (pillars) to improve the quality of patient care. However, the state of knowledge and practice of psychologists in French speaking Europe is still unknown.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to find out what these psychologists know about EBP and whether they use it in their daily practice.

Method

A questionnaire of 50 multiple-choice questions for French-speaking Belgian psychologists was posted online on social networks. The questions focused on psychologists’ knowledge and beliefs about EBP and the information that guides clinicians in their practice.

Results

A total of 110 psychologists responded to the survey. Only one third of the psychologists surveyed knew what PBA was. In their daily decision making, clinicians rely on past experience, accumulated knowledge and the difficulties presented by the patient, but scientific literature, patient preferences and opinions about treatment and expert opinions provide little guidance in their practice. Furthermore, perceived barriers, such as lack of knowledge and know-how, seem to prevent psychologists from using EBP in their daily practice.

Conclusion

A lack of knowledge of EBP among psychologists was revealed. Furthermore, the behaviours implemented in daily practice were not fully in line with the EBP. The survey data indicate that there is a need for more training for clinicians to improve their understanding of practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Pratiques psychologiques is an official publication of the ''Société française de psychologie''. It publishes thematic issues, and concentrates on the applications in the psychological practice. It covers all fields of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board L’evidence-based practice en psychologie : une approche tripartite souvent mal comprise Difficultés et dispositifs d’aide en lecture à la fin du CP dans la cohorte ELFE. Quelques pistes de réflexion pour la pratique du psychologue de l’Éducation nationale Épidaure Market : développement d’un serious game sur l’alimentation durable, une intervention menée en milieu scolaire pour les collégiens Remerciements aux lecteurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1