OSABSS:评估外科住院医师基本外科技能的真实考试

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.008
Leila Sadati , Fatemeh Edalattalab , Niloofar Hajati , Sahar Karami , Ali Baradaran Bagheri , Mohammad Hadi Bahri , Rana Abjar
{"title":"OSABSS:评估外科住院医师基本外科技能的真实考试","authors":"Leila Sadati ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Edalattalab ,&nbsp;Niloofar Hajati ,&nbsp;Sahar Karami ,&nbsp;Ali Baradaran Bagheri ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hadi Bahri ,&nbsp;Rana Abjar","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to develop and validate the OSABSS (Objective Structured Assessment of Basic Surgical Skills), a modified Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), to assess basic surgical skills in residents.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A developmental study conducted in two phases. Basic skills were identified through literature review and gap analysis. The OSABSS was then designed as a modified OSCE.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>This study took place at Alborz University of Medical Sciences in Iran.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The OSABSS was created using Harden's OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) methodology. Scenarios, checklists, and station configurations were developed through expert panels. The exam was piloted and implemented with residents as participants and faculty as evaluators.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>32 surgical residents in gynecology, general surgery, orthopedics, and neurosurgery participated. 22 faculty members were evaluators.</p></div><div><h3>Primary and secondary outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was OSABSS exam scores. Secondary outcomes were written exam scores, and national residency entrance ranks.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The mean OSABSS score was 16.59 ± 0.19 across all stations. Criterion validity was demonstrated through correlations between OSABSS scores, written scores and entrance ranks. Reliability was high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87. No significant inter-rater score differences were found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The rigorous OSABSS development process produced an exam demonstrating strong validity and reliability for assessing basic surgical skills. The comprehensive station variety evaluates diverse technical and non-technical competencies. Further research should expand participant samples across surgical disciplines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 217-222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000575/pdfft?md5=9be1951c72fcd6a461be1d9d7ac08321&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000575-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OSABSS: An authentic examination for assessing basic surgical skills in surgical residents\",\"authors\":\"Leila Sadati ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Edalattalab ,&nbsp;Niloofar Hajati ,&nbsp;Sahar Karami ,&nbsp;Ali Baradaran Bagheri ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hadi Bahri ,&nbsp;Rana Abjar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to develop and validate the OSABSS (Objective Structured Assessment of Basic Surgical Skills), a modified Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), to assess basic surgical skills in residents.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A developmental study conducted in two phases. Basic skills were identified through literature review and gap analysis. The OSABSS was then designed as a modified OSCE.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>This study took place at Alborz University of Medical Sciences in Iran.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The OSABSS was created using Harden's OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) methodology. Scenarios, checklists, and station configurations were developed through expert panels. The exam was piloted and implemented with residents as participants and faculty as evaluators.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>32 surgical residents in gynecology, general surgery, orthopedics, and neurosurgery participated. 22 faculty members were evaluators.</p></div><div><h3>Primary and secondary outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was OSABSS exam scores. Secondary outcomes were written exam scores, and national residency entrance ranks.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The mean OSABSS score was 16.59 ± 0.19 across all stations. Criterion validity was demonstrated through correlations between OSABSS scores, written scores and entrance ranks. Reliability was high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87. No significant inter-rater score differences were found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The rigorous OSABSS development process produced an exam demonstrating strong validity and reliability for assessing basic surgical skills. The comprehensive station variety evaluates diverse technical and non-technical competencies. Further research should expand participant samples across surgical disciplines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery open science\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 217-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000575/pdfft?md5=9be1951c72fcd6a461be1d9d7ac08321&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000575-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标本研究旨在开发和验证 OSABSS(外科基本技能客观结构化评估),这是一种改良的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE),用于评估住院医师的外科基本技能。通过文献回顾和差距分析确定了基本技能。然后将 OSABSS 设计为一种改进的 OSCE。研究地点本研究在伊朗的阿尔伯兹医科大学进行。场景、检查表和考台配置均由专家小组制定。该考试由住院医师作为参与者,教师作为评估者进行试点和实施。参与者 32 名妇科、普外科、骨科和神经外科的外科住院医师参加了考试。主要和次要结果测量主要结果是 OSABSS 考试分数。次要结果为笔试成绩和国家住院医师入学排名。主要结果所有站点的平均 OSABSS 得分为 16.59 ± 0.19。OSABSS 分数、笔试分数和入学排名之间的相关性证明了标准有效性。信度很高,Cronbach's alpha 为 0.87。结论通过严格的 OSABSS 开发过程,我们开发出了一种在评估基本外科技能方面具有很高有效性和可靠性的考试。综合站的多样性评估了不同的技术和非技术能力。进一步的研究应扩大各外科学科的参与者样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OSABSS: An authentic examination for assessing basic surgical skills in surgical residents

Objectives

This study aimed to develop and validate the OSABSS (Objective Structured Assessment of Basic Surgical Skills), a modified Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), to assess basic surgical skills in residents.

Design

A developmental study conducted in two phases. Basic skills were identified through literature review and gap analysis. The OSABSS was then designed as a modified OSCE.

Setting

This study took place at Alborz University of Medical Sciences in Iran.

Interventions

The OSABSS was created using Harden's OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) methodology. Scenarios, checklists, and station configurations were developed through expert panels. The exam was piloted and implemented with residents as participants and faculty as evaluators.

Participants

32 surgical residents in gynecology, general surgery, orthopedics, and neurosurgery participated. 22 faculty members were evaluators.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was OSABSS exam scores. Secondary outcomes were written exam scores, and national residency entrance ranks.

Main results

The mean OSABSS score was 16.59 ± 0.19 across all stations. Criterion validity was demonstrated through correlations between OSABSS scores, written scores and entrance ranks. Reliability was high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87. No significant inter-rater score differences were found.

Conclusions

The rigorous OSABSS development process produced an exam demonstrating strong validity and reliability for assessing basic surgical skills. The comprehensive station variety evaluates diverse technical and non-technical competencies. Further research should expand participant samples across surgical disciplines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Management of Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: A systematic review of national and International Clinical Guidelines (CoSMIC-G) Primary delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: A matched-pair comparison of Roux-en-Y vs. Billroth-II reconstruction Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study Engagement and learning approaches among medical students in an online surgical teaching programme: A cross-sectional study Gender and age specific dynamics of health-related postoperative outcome measures following the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1