基于统计形状建模的盂兰盆骨折前三维解剖预测

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2024.04.001
{"title":"基于统计形状建模的盂兰盆骨折前三维解剖预测","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Restoration of an anatomic joint line after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty<span> and of the optimal lateral offset after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty<span> may be relatively straightforward when the glenoid does not present with severe erosion. However, in cases of severe glenoid bone loss, the surgeon is left with no preoperative landmark to restore these parameters. The objective of this study was to use statistical shape modeling, to predict the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. We hypothesized that this would allow us to accurately determine premorbid glenoid version and inclination, in addition to accurately quantifying bone loss and medialization.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty-six bilateral computed tomography scans<span><span> of the shoulders of patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty and determined to have unilateral osteoarthritis (primary osteoarthritis or </span>cuff tear arthropathy<span> with a healthy contralateral<span><span> side) were obtained. A statistical shape model was automatically applied on the pathologic arthritic side to predict its premorbid anatomy. Glenoid version, inclination, height, width, and glenoid and </span>scapula lateral offset were measured automatically. These measurements were obtained on the pathological arthritic cases, on the contralateral control healthy cases, and on the premorbid predictions of the pathological arthritic cases and were compared pair by pair.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean difference between the pathological arthritic side and the contralateral healthy side was 9.1° ± 7.3° for version, 4.8° ± 4.8° for inclination, 4.9 ± 4.5 mm for height, 4.7 ± 5.3 mm for width, 2.4 ± 1.9 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 1.5 ± 1.5 mm. The mean difference between the premorbid prediction of the pathological side and the contralateral healthy side was reduced to 3.3° ± 2.4° for version, 3.4° ± 2.6° for inclination, 3.0 ± 1.9 mm for height, 2.3 ± 1.4 mm for width, 2.2 ± 1.7 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 0.9 ± 0.8 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows that statistical shape modeling can allow accurate prediction of the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. This could help optimize implant selection and positioning after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore optimal soft-tissue tension.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 698-707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of premorbid three-dimensional anatomy of the glenoid based on statistical shape modeling\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Restoration of an anatomic joint line after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty<span> and of the optimal lateral offset after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty<span> may be relatively straightforward when the glenoid does not present with severe erosion. However, in cases of severe glenoid bone loss, the surgeon is left with no preoperative landmark to restore these parameters. The objective of this study was to use statistical shape modeling, to predict the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. We hypothesized that this would allow us to accurately determine premorbid glenoid version and inclination, in addition to accurately quantifying bone loss and medialization.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty-six bilateral computed tomography scans<span><span> of the shoulders of patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty and determined to have unilateral osteoarthritis (primary osteoarthritis or </span>cuff tear arthropathy<span> with a healthy contralateral<span><span> side) were obtained. A statistical shape model was automatically applied on the pathologic arthritic side to predict its premorbid anatomy. Glenoid version, inclination, height, width, and glenoid and </span>scapula lateral offset were measured automatically. These measurements were obtained on the pathological arthritic cases, on the contralateral control healthy cases, and on the premorbid predictions of the pathological arthritic cases and were compared pair by pair.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean difference between the pathological arthritic side and the contralateral healthy side was 9.1° ± 7.3° for version, 4.8° ± 4.8° for inclination, 4.9 ± 4.5 mm for height, 4.7 ± 5.3 mm for width, 2.4 ± 1.9 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 1.5 ± 1.5 mm. The mean difference between the premorbid prediction of the pathological side and the contralateral healthy side was reduced to 3.3° ± 2.4° for version, 3.4° ± 2.6° for inclination, 3.0 ± 1.9 mm for height, 2.3 ± 1.4 mm for width, 2.2 ± 1.7 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 0.9 ± 0.8 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows that statistical shape modeling can allow accurate prediction of the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. This could help optimize implant selection and positioning after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore optimal soft-tissue tension.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 698-707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在解剖型全肩关节置换术后恢复解剖关节线,以及在反向全肩关节置换术后恢复最佳外侧偏移量,在盂骨未出现严重侵蚀的情况下可能相对简单。然而,在盂骨严重缺损的情况下,外科医生术前就没有恢复这些参数的地标了。本研究的目的是利用统计形状建模来预测盂骨在骨坏死前的形态。我们假设,除了准确量化骨质流失和内侧化外,这还能让我们准确确定盂成形前的大小和倾斜度。方法获得了56例计划进行肩关节置换术的患者的双侧肩部计算机断层扫描图像,并确定其患有单侧骨关节炎(原发性骨关节炎或袖撕裂关节病,对侧健康)。统计形状模型自动应用于病理关节炎侧,以预测其病前解剖结构。自动测量盂成形度、倾斜度、高度、宽度以及盂和肩胛骨的外侧偏移。病理关节炎病例、对侧对照健康病例以及病理关节炎病例的病前预测值都获得了这些测量值,并进行了逐对比较。结果病理关节炎侧与对侧健康侧的平均差异为:角度(9.1° ± 7.3°)、倾斜度(4.8° ± 4.8°)、高度(4.9 ± 4.5 mm)、宽度(4.7 ± 5.3 mm)、肩胛骨外侧偏移量(2.4 ± 1.9 mm)和盂外侧偏移量(1.5 ± 1.5 mm)。病理侧与对侧健康侧的病前预测值的平均差异缩小为:角度(3.3° ± 2.4°)、倾斜度(3.4° ± 2.6°)、高度(3.0 ± 1.9 mm)、宽度(2.3 ± 1.结论本研究表明,统计形状建模可准确预测盂前形态。这有助于优化解剖型全肩关节置换术和反向全肩关节置换术后的植入物选择和定位,以恢复最佳的软组织张力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of premorbid three-dimensional anatomy of the glenoid based on statistical shape modeling

Background

Restoration of an anatomic joint line after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and of the optimal lateral offset after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may be relatively straightforward when the glenoid does not present with severe erosion. However, in cases of severe glenoid bone loss, the surgeon is left with no preoperative landmark to restore these parameters. The objective of this study was to use statistical shape modeling, to predict the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. We hypothesized that this would allow us to accurately determine premorbid glenoid version and inclination, in addition to accurately quantifying bone loss and medialization.

Methods

Fifty-six bilateral computed tomography scans of the shoulders of patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty and determined to have unilateral osteoarthritis (primary osteoarthritis or cuff tear arthropathy with a healthy contralateral side) were obtained. A statistical shape model was automatically applied on the pathologic arthritic side to predict its premorbid anatomy. Glenoid version, inclination, height, width, and glenoid and scapula lateral offset were measured automatically. These measurements were obtained on the pathological arthritic cases, on the contralateral control healthy cases, and on the premorbid predictions of the pathological arthritic cases and were compared pair by pair.

Results

The mean difference between the pathological arthritic side and the contralateral healthy side was 9.1° ± 7.3° for version, 4.8° ± 4.8° for inclination, 4.9 ± 4.5 mm for height, 4.7 ± 5.3 mm for width, 2.4 ± 1.9 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 1.5 ± 1.5 mm. The mean difference between the premorbid prediction of the pathological side and the contralateral healthy side was reduced to 3.3° ± 2.4° for version, 3.4° ± 2.6° for inclination, 3.0 ± 1.9 mm for height, 2.3 ± 1.4 mm for width, 2.2 ± 1.7 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 0.9 ± 0.8 mm.

Conclusion

This study shows that statistical shape modeling can allow accurate prediction of the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. This could help optimize implant selection and positioning after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore optimal soft-tissue tension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Comparing comorbidity burden between patients undergoing ambulatory rotator cuff repair vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty Reaching MCID, SCB, and PASS for ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS following shoulder arthroplasty does not correlate with patient satisfaction Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using hybrid glenoid fixation with a porous-coated titanium post. Two- to ten-year follow-up of 256 cases with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1