{"title":"基于统计形状建模的盂兰盆骨折前三维解剖预测","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Restoration of an anatomic joint line after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty<span> and of the optimal lateral offset after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty<span> may be relatively straightforward when the glenoid does not present with severe erosion. However, in cases of severe glenoid bone loss, the surgeon is left with no preoperative landmark to restore these parameters. The objective of this study was to use statistical shape modeling, to predict the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. We hypothesized that this would allow us to accurately determine premorbid glenoid version and inclination, in addition to accurately quantifying bone loss and medialization.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty-six bilateral computed tomography scans<span><span> of the shoulders of patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty and determined to have unilateral osteoarthritis (primary osteoarthritis or </span>cuff tear arthropathy<span> with a healthy contralateral<span><span> side) were obtained. A statistical shape model was automatically applied on the pathologic arthritic side to predict its premorbid anatomy. Glenoid version, inclination, height, width, and glenoid and </span>scapula lateral offset were measured automatically. These measurements were obtained on the pathological arthritic cases, on the contralateral control healthy cases, and on the premorbid predictions of the pathological arthritic cases and were compared pair by pair.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean difference between the pathological arthritic side and the contralateral healthy side was 9.1° ± 7.3° for version, 4.8° ± 4.8° for inclination, 4.9 ± 4.5 mm for height, 4.7 ± 5.3 mm for width, 2.4 ± 1.9 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 1.5 ± 1.5 mm. The mean difference between the premorbid prediction of the pathological side and the contralateral healthy side was reduced to 3.3° ± 2.4° for version, 3.4° ± 2.6° for inclination, 3.0 ± 1.9 mm for height, 2.3 ± 1.4 mm for width, 2.2 ± 1.7 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 0.9 ± 0.8 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows that statistical shape modeling can allow accurate prediction of the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. This could help optimize implant selection and positioning after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore optimal soft-tissue tension.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 698-707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of premorbid three-dimensional anatomy of the glenoid based on statistical shape modeling\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Restoration of an anatomic joint line after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty<span> and of the optimal lateral offset after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty<span> may be relatively straightforward when the glenoid does not present with severe erosion. However, in cases of severe glenoid bone loss, the surgeon is left with no preoperative landmark to restore these parameters. The objective of this study was to use statistical shape modeling, to predict the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. We hypothesized that this would allow us to accurately determine premorbid glenoid version and inclination, in addition to accurately quantifying bone loss and medialization.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty-six bilateral computed tomography scans<span><span> of the shoulders of patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty and determined to have unilateral osteoarthritis (primary osteoarthritis or </span>cuff tear arthropathy<span> with a healthy contralateral<span><span> side) were obtained. A statistical shape model was automatically applied on the pathologic arthritic side to predict its premorbid anatomy. Glenoid version, inclination, height, width, and glenoid and </span>scapula lateral offset were measured automatically. These measurements were obtained on the pathological arthritic cases, on the contralateral control healthy cases, and on the premorbid predictions of the pathological arthritic cases and were compared pair by pair.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean difference between the pathological arthritic side and the contralateral healthy side was 9.1° ± 7.3° for version, 4.8° ± 4.8° for inclination, 4.9 ± 4.5 mm for height, 4.7 ± 5.3 mm for width, 2.4 ± 1.9 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 1.5 ± 1.5 mm. The mean difference between the premorbid prediction of the pathological side and the contralateral healthy side was reduced to 3.3° ± 2.4° for version, 3.4° ± 2.6° for inclination, 3.0 ± 1.9 mm for height, 2.3 ± 1.4 mm for width, 2.2 ± 1.7 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 0.9 ± 0.8 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows that statistical shape modeling can allow accurate prediction of the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. This could help optimize implant selection and positioning after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore optimal soft-tissue tension.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 698-707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction of premorbid three-dimensional anatomy of the glenoid based on statistical shape modeling
Background
Restoration of an anatomic joint line after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and of the optimal lateral offset after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may be relatively straightforward when the glenoid does not present with severe erosion. However, in cases of severe glenoid bone loss, the surgeon is left with no preoperative landmark to restore these parameters. The objective of this study was to use statistical shape modeling, to predict the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. We hypothesized that this would allow us to accurately determine premorbid glenoid version and inclination, in addition to accurately quantifying bone loss and medialization.
Methods
Fifty-six bilateral computed tomography scans of the shoulders of patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty and determined to have unilateral osteoarthritis (primary osteoarthritis or cuff tear arthropathy with a healthy contralateral side) were obtained. A statistical shape model was automatically applied on the pathologic arthritic side to predict its premorbid anatomy. Glenoid version, inclination, height, width, and glenoid and scapula lateral offset were measured automatically. These measurements were obtained on the pathological arthritic cases, on the contralateral control healthy cases, and on the premorbid predictions of the pathological arthritic cases and were compared pair by pair.
Results
The mean difference between the pathological arthritic side and the contralateral healthy side was 9.1° ± 7.3° for version, 4.8° ± 4.8° for inclination, 4.9 ± 4.5 mm for height, 4.7 ± 5.3 mm for width, 2.4 ± 1.9 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 1.5 ± 1.5 mm. The mean difference between the premorbid prediction of the pathological side and the contralateral healthy side was reduced to 3.3° ± 2.4° for version, 3.4° ± 2.6° for inclination, 3.0 ± 1.9 mm for height, 2.3 ± 1.4 mm for width, 2.2 ± 1.7 mm for scapula lateral offset, and the glenoid lateral offset was 0.9 ± 0.8 mm.
Conclusion
This study shows that statistical shape modeling can allow accurate prediction of the premorbid morphology of the glenoid. This could help optimize implant selection and positioning after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to restore optimal soft-tissue tension.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.