医学生接受移情技能强化体验培训后移情水平的提高

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.5152/pcp.2021.21098
Efpraxia Avlogiari, Stella Maria Karagiannaki, Eleftherios Panteris, Anastasia Konsta, Ioannis Diakogiannis
{"title":"医学生接受移情技能强化体验培训后移情水平的提高","authors":"Efpraxia Avlogiari, Stella Maria Karagiannaki, Eleftherios Panteris, Anastasia Konsta, Ioannis Diakogiannis","doi":"10.5152/pcp.2021.21098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>EMPATHY IN HEALTHCARE is an intensive 20-hour experiential training program based on mediation techniques and specialized healthcare role-play for clinicians and medical students. It is hypothesized that the training will improve empathy via the intensive experiential techniques implemented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 medical students (25 males/25 females) took the course voluntarily. Empathy was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical Students Version (JSE-S) (Greek version), before and after the 20-hour training, along with a 6-month follow-up. Gender, age, preferred medical specialty and baseline empathy score were explored as possible moderator variables of the training effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empathy increased after training, with a mean JSE-S score improvement of 11.25 points (±8.848) (<i>P</i> < .001). After 6 months, the mean JSE-S score maintained a difference of 6.514 points (±12.912) (<i>P</i> < .005). No differences were recorded with regard to gender, age group or medical specialty for the pooled data. Women in the 22-24 year-old age group had a 5-point mean difference (<i>P</i> = .05), and higher post-training scores than men. Lower initial scorers were the ones that mostly improved, with a 3-fold mean score difference from the higher scorers regardless of gender (<i>P</i> < .001), while also showing a smaller drop in empathy levels 6 months after the training compared to the higher scorers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intensive experiential training can improve empathy in a clinical setting. <b>EMPATHY IN HEALTHCARE</b> is a successful training program in improving empathy in medical students, as measured by the JSE-S. A score of 110 and below could be used for selecting medical student candidates who will benefit most from empathy training.</p>","PeriodicalId":20847,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":"31 4","pages":"392-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11079646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Medical Students' Empathy Levels After an Intensive Experiential Training on Empathy Skills.\",\"authors\":\"Efpraxia Avlogiari, Stella Maria Karagiannaki, Eleftherios Panteris, Anastasia Konsta, Ioannis Diakogiannis\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/pcp.2021.21098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>EMPATHY IN HEALTHCARE is an intensive 20-hour experiential training program based on mediation techniques and specialized healthcare role-play for clinicians and medical students. It is hypothesized that the training will improve empathy via the intensive experiential techniques implemented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 medical students (25 males/25 females) took the course voluntarily. Empathy was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical Students Version (JSE-S) (Greek version), before and after the 20-hour training, along with a 6-month follow-up. Gender, age, preferred medical specialty and baseline empathy score were explored as possible moderator variables of the training effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empathy increased after training, with a mean JSE-S score improvement of 11.25 points (±8.848) (<i>P</i> < .001). After 6 months, the mean JSE-S score maintained a difference of 6.514 points (±12.912) (<i>P</i> < .005). No differences were recorded with regard to gender, age group or medical specialty for the pooled data. Women in the 22-24 year-old age group had a 5-point mean difference (<i>P</i> = .05), and higher post-training scores than men. Lower initial scorers were the ones that mostly improved, with a 3-fold mean score difference from the higher scorers regardless of gender (<i>P</i> < .001), while also showing a smaller drop in empathy levels 6 months after the training compared to the higher scorers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intensive experiential training can improve empathy in a clinical setting. <b>EMPATHY IN HEALTHCARE</b> is a successful training program in improving empathy in medical students, as measured by the JSE-S. A score of 110 and below could be used for selecting medical student candidates who will benefit most from empathy training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"392-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11079646/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2021.21098\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2021.21098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍医疗保健中的移情是一项 20 小时的强化体验式培训计划,以调解技术和专业医疗保健角色扮演为基础,面向临床医生和医科学生。假设该培训将通过所实施的强化体验技术提高移情能力:共有 50 名医学生(25 名男生/25 名女生)自愿参加了该课程。在 20 个小时的培训前后和 6 个月的随访中,使用杰斐逊移情量表-医学生版(JSE-S)(希腊文版)对移情进行了测量。性别、年龄、偏好的医学专业和移情基线得分被视为培训效果可能的调节变量:结果:培训后,移情能力有所提高,JSE-S 平均得分提高了 11.25 分(±8.848)(P < .001)。6 个月后,JSE-S 平均得分保持了 6.514 分(±12.912)的差异(P < .005)。在汇总数据中,性别、年龄组或医学专业均无差异。22-24 岁年龄组的女性与男性相比,平均相差 5 分(P = .05),培训后得分更高。最初得分较低的学员大多有所改善,与得分较高的学员相比,不论性别,平均分相差 3 倍(P < .001),同时与得分较高的学员相比,培训 6 个月后移情水平的下降幅度也较小:结论:强化体验式培训可以提高临床环境中的移情能力。医护同理心》是一项成功的培训项目,能提高医学生的同理心水平(以 JSE-S 为衡量标准)。得分在 110 分及以下的医学生可用于挑选从移情培训中获益最多的医学生候选人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improvement of Medical Students' Empathy Levels After an Intensive Experiential Training on Empathy Skills.

Background: EMPATHY IN HEALTHCARE is an intensive 20-hour experiential training program based on mediation techniques and specialized healthcare role-play for clinicians and medical students. It is hypothesized that the training will improve empathy via the intensive experiential techniques implemented.

Methods: A total of 50 medical students (25 males/25 females) took the course voluntarily. Empathy was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical Students Version (JSE-S) (Greek version), before and after the 20-hour training, along with a 6-month follow-up. Gender, age, preferred medical specialty and baseline empathy score were explored as possible moderator variables of the training effect.

Results: Empathy increased after training, with a mean JSE-S score improvement of 11.25 points (±8.848) (P < .001). After 6 months, the mean JSE-S score maintained a difference of 6.514 points (±12.912) (P < .005). No differences were recorded with regard to gender, age group or medical specialty for the pooled data. Women in the 22-24 year-old age group had a 5-point mean difference (P = .05), and higher post-training scores than men. Lower initial scorers were the ones that mostly improved, with a 3-fold mean score difference from the higher scorers regardless of gender (P < .001), while also showing a smaller drop in empathy levels 6 months after the training compared to the higher scorers.

Conclusion: Intensive experiential training can improve empathy in a clinical setting. EMPATHY IN HEALTHCARE is a successful training program in improving empathy in medical students, as measured by the JSE-S. A score of 110 and below could be used for selecting medical student candidates who will benefit most from empathy training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology aims to reach a national and international audience and will accept submissions from authors worldwide. It gives high priority to original studies of interest to clinicians and scientists in applied and basic neurosciences and related disciplines. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes high quality research targeted to specialists, residents and scientists in psychiatry, psychology, neurology, pharmacology, molecular biology, genetics, physiology, neurochemistry, and related sciences.
期刊最新文献
Advances in the Study of the Correlation Between Patent Foramen Ovale and Migraine. Assessment of Mothers' Shaking Behavior of their Babies and Related Factors: An Experimental Approach Using an Accelerometer and an Infant Manikin. Brexpiprazole for a Patient with Ekbom Syndrome with Intolerable Side Effect of Aripiprazole. Changes in Child Psychiatry Presentations in the Second Wave of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Compared to the Pre-pandemic Period and the First Wave: A Follow-up Study. Childhood Maltreatment Associated with Anxiety and Depression and Complex PTSD Symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1