{"title":"规范加拿大的移动健康研究:公众信任和公众参与","authors":"M.H. Zawati , M. Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Smartphone applications provide unique opportunities for health research. Prospective participants may be recruited, give consent, and may share personal health information with researchers with unparalleled efficiency. Mobile health apps thus have the potential to profoundly alter the way health research is conducted, thereby contributing to more effective and more equitably distributed clinical interventions. But the regulation of this kind of research is uncertain. The absence of regulatory guidance may limit mobile health's promise.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The mobile health research landscape in Canada is considered in the context of the existing regulatory framework, academic literature, and current applications.</p></div><div><h3>Results/discussion</h3><p>This paper outlines regulatory issues in the Canadian context, suggesting three key issues to which researchers and regulators ought to be attentive to ensure public trust: consent, return of results, and privacy and security.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion/perspectives</h3><p>Further consideration of regulatory and ethical issues is needed if mobile health will earn the public's trust and promote public participation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100988"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000239/pdfft?md5=a8ebdab94b3b99a92c8e45fb58888d85&pid=1-s2.0-S2352552524000239-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating mobile health research in Canada: Public trust and public participation\",\"authors\":\"M.H. Zawati , M. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.100988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Smartphone applications provide unique opportunities for health research. Prospective participants may be recruited, give consent, and may share personal health information with researchers with unparalleled efficiency. Mobile health apps thus have the potential to profoundly alter the way health research is conducted, thereby contributing to more effective and more equitably distributed clinical interventions. But the regulation of this kind of research is uncertain. The absence of regulatory guidance may limit mobile health's promise.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The mobile health research landscape in Canada is considered in the context of the existing regulatory framework, academic literature, and current applications.</p></div><div><h3>Results/discussion</h3><p>This paper outlines regulatory issues in the Canadian context, suggesting three key issues to which researchers and regulators ought to be attentive to ensure public trust: consent, return of results, and privacy and security.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion/perspectives</h3><p>Further consideration of regulatory and ethical issues is needed if mobile health will earn the public's trust and promote public participation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000239/pdfft?md5=a8ebdab94b3b99a92c8e45fb58888d85&pid=1-s2.0-S2352552524000239-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regulating mobile health research in Canada: Public trust and public participation
Background
Smartphone applications provide unique opportunities for health research. Prospective participants may be recruited, give consent, and may share personal health information with researchers with unparalleled efficiency. Mobile health apps thus have the potential to profoundly alter the way health research is conducted, thereby contributing to more effective and more equitably distributed clinical interventions. But the regulation of this kind of research is uncertain. The absence of regulatory guidance may limit mobile health's promise.
Methodology
The mobile health research landscape in Canada is considered in the context of the existing regulatory framework, academic literature, and current applications.
Results/discussion
This paper outlines regulatory issues in the Canadian context, suggesting three key issues to which researchers and regulators ought to be attentive to ensure public trust: consent, return of results, and privacy and security.
Conclusion/perspectives
Further consideration of regulatory and ethical issues is needed if mobile health will earn the public's trust and promote public participation.
期刊介绍:
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.