耕地土壤中的溶解有机碳:全球管理效应荟萃分析

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109080
Tianjing Ren , Aleksandra Ukalska-Jaruga , Bożena Smreczak , Andong Cai
{"title":"耕地土壤中的溶解有机碳:全球管理效应荟萃分析","authors":"Tianjing Ren ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Ukalska-Jaruga ,&nbsp;Bożena Smreczak ,&nbsp;Andong Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in agricultural soils is a pivotal indicator of soil carbon response to management practices, facilitating substance transport, energy transfer, and information exchange. Despite its importance, there is limited understanding of the global impact of these practices on the magnitude, drivers, and functionality of soil DOC. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of 3539 paired DOC, 196 paired soil carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, and 1424 paired crop yields from cropland soils to fill this knowledge gap. Management practices included conservation tillage (CT), nitrogen fertilizer, straw, manure, nitrogen combined with straw (NS), nitrogen combined with manure (NM), and biochar. DOC under NM, manure, NS, straw, nitrogen fertilizer, biochar, and CT increased significantly by 78.21%, 49.91%, 41.02%, 25.68%, 18.4%, 14.89%, and 9.74%, respectively. Except for biochar and CT, the other management practices also led to an increase in the DOC/SOC ratio, ranging from 7.66% to 15.79%. Biochar application decreases the DOC/SOC ratio by 25.02%, indicating its soil carbon stability and the potential for carbon sequestration. The intensity and duration of management practices emerged as driving factors influencing the DOC. Each unit increase of DOC under nitrogen fertilizer, straw, and NM not only effectively decreased the effect size of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but also increased the effect size of crop yields in contrast to CT, manure, NS, and biochar. Overall, this study highlighted the importance of the intensity and duration of management practices on DOC. The regulation of DOC through management practices is also required to account for both environmental aspects and crop yields for sustainable agricultural development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissolved organic carbon in cropland soils: A global meta-analysis of management effects\",\"authors\":\"Tianjing Ren ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Ukalska-Jaruga ,&nbsp;Bożena Smreczak ,&nbsp;Andong Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in agricultural soils is a pivotal indicator of soil carbon response to management practices, facilitating substance transport, energy transfer, and information exchange. Despite its importance, there is limited understanding of the global impact of these practices on the magnitude, drivers, and functionality of soil DOC. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of 3539 paired DOC, 196 paired soil carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, and 1424 paired crop yields from cropland soils to fill this knowledge gap. Management practices included conservation tillage (CT), nitrogen fertilizer, straw, manure, nitrogen combined with straw (NS), nitrogen combined with manure (NM), and biochar. DOC under NM, manure, NS, straw, nitrogen fertilizer, biochar, and CT increased significantly by 78.21%, 49.91%, 41.02%, 25.68%, 18.4%, 14.89%, and 9.74%, respectively. Except for biochar and CT, the other management practices also led to an increase in the DOC/SOC ratio, ranging from 7.66% to 15.79%. Biochar application decreases the DOC/SOC ratio by 25.02%, indicating its soil carbon stability and the potential for carbon sequestration. The intensity and duration of management practices emerged as driving factors influencing the DOC. Each unit increase of DOC under nitrogen fertilizer, straw, and NM not only effectively decreased the effect size of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but also increased the effect size of crop yields in contrast to CT, manure, NS, and biochar. Overall, this study highlighted the importance of the intensity and duration of management practices on DOC. The regulation of DOC through management practices is also required to account for both environmental aspects and crop yields for sustainable agricultural development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924001981\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924001981","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业土壤中的溶解有机碳(DOC)是衡量土壤碳对管理措施反应的关键指标,可促进物质迁移、能量传递和信息交换。尽管其重要性不言而喻,但人们对这些措施对土壤溶解有机碳的规模、驱动因素和功能的全球影响的了解却很有限。在此,我们对来自农田土壤的 3539 个配对 DOC、196 个配对土壤二氧化碳 (CO2) 排放量和 1424 个配对作物产量进行了荟萃分析,以填补这一知识空白。管理方法包括保护性耕作(CT)、氮肥、秸秆、粪肥、氮肥与秸秆结合(NS)、氮肥与粪肥结合(NM)以及生物炭。NM、粪肥、NS、秸秆、氮肥、生物炭和 CT 的 DOC 分别显著增加了 78.21%、49.91%、41.02%、25.68%、18.4%、14.89% 和 9.74%。除生物炭和 CT 外,其他管理方法也导致 DOC/SOC 比率增加,范围从 7.66% 到 15.79%。生物炭的施用使 DOC/SOC 比率降低了 25.02%,这表明生物炭具有土壤碳稳定性和固碳潜力。管理措施的强度和持续时间是影响 DOC 的驱动因素。与 CT、粪肥、NS 和生物炭相比,氮肥、秸秆和 NM 每增加一个 DOC 单位,不仅能有效降低二氧化碳排放量的效应大小,还能增加作物产量的效应大小。总之,本研究强调了管理措施的强度和持续时间对 DOC 的重要性。为了实现农业可持续发展,还需要通过管理措施调节 DOC,以兼顾环境因素和作物产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dissolved organic carbon in cropland soils: A global meta-analysis of management effects

Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in agricultural soils is a pivotal indicator of soil carbon response to management practices, facilitating substance transport, energy transfer, and information exchange. Despite its importance, there is limited understanding of the global impact of these practices on the magnitude, drivers, and functionality of soil DOC. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of 3539 paired DOC, 196 paired soil carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and 1424 paired crop yields from cropland soils to fill this knowledge gap. Management practices included conservation tillage (CT), nitrogen fertilizer, straw, manure, nitrogen combined with straw (NS), nitrogen combined with manure (NM), and biochar. DOC under NM, manure, NS, straw, nitrogen fertilizer, biochar, and CT increased significantly by 78.21%, 49.91%, 41.02%, 25.68%, 18.4%, 14.89%, and 9.74%, respectively. Except for biochar and CT, the other management practices also led to an increase in the DOC/SOC ratio, ranging from 7.66% to 15.79%. Biochar application decreases the DOC/SOC ratio by 25.02%, indicating its soil carbon stability and the potential for carbon sequestration. The intensity and duration of management practices emerged as driving factors influencing the DOC. Each unit increase of DOC under nitrogen fertilizer, straw, and NM not only effectively decreased the effect size of CO2 emissions, but also increased the effect size of crop yields in contrast to CT, manure, NS, and biochar. Overall, this study highlighted the importance of the intensity and duration of management practices on DOC. The regulation of DOC through management practices is also required to account for both environmental aspects and crop yields for sustainable agricultural development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Deciphering microbial drivers of soil organic matter mineralization in surface and subsurface soil during long-term vegetation succession Changes in soil bacterial community diversity and its network stability under different grazing intensities in plateau rangelands Partitioning and controlling factors of evapotranspiration: 2. Dynamics and controls of ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration at multiple timescales in agroforestry system The impact of pollination requirements, pollinators, landscape and management practices on pollination in sweet and sour cherry: A systematic review Warming decouples associations between microbial network complexity and ecosystem multifunctionality in alpine grasslands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1