对生物金融化的问题化审查

IF 8.3 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Critical Perspectives on Accounting Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102739
Niina Kuokkanen
{"title":"对生物金融化的问题化审查","authors":"Niina Kuokkanen","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the spread of financial logic and reasoning into the valuation practices by which living beings are valued. The purpose is two-fold. First, by conducting a literature review, the paper aims to connect critical accounting studies and other disciplines that address the financialization of living beings. The second purpose is cross-disciplinary as the aim is to problematize the disparate treatment of living beings in the previous financialization literature. In contrast to the previous financialization literature, this paper takes a multispecies approach by acknowledging the complex interdependences between all living beings. The research method used is a problematizing review, which enables the researcher to rethink and deconstruct dominant assumptions in the existing literature on the financialization of living beings. According to the findings, the financialization of living beings has been studied mainly from the perspective of three different theoretical traditions: 1) Foucauldian-inspired tradition of biopolitics and governmentality 2) ANT-inspired performativity and 3) financialization as a mode of Marxist capital accumulation. In addition, this paper identifies factors that enable and hamper the financialization process. By reviewing different disciplines, this paper suggests new and more holistic ways to study the financialization of living beings in critical accounting research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235424000388/pdfft?md5=1329e6c98dceceb7742a27016290a450&pid=1-s2.0-S1045235424000388-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A problematizing review of the financialization of living beings\",\"authors\":\"Niina Kuokkanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines the spread of financial logic and reasoning into the valuation practices by which living beings are valued. The purpose is two-fold. First, by conducting a literature review, the paper aims to connect critical accounting studies and other disciplines that address the financialization of living beings. The second purpose is cross-disciplinary as the aim is to problematize the disparate treatment of living beings in the previous financialization literature. In contrast to the previous financialization literature, this paper takes a multispecies approach by acknowledging the complex interdependences between all living beings. The research method used is a problematizing review, which enables the researcher to rethink and deconstruct dominant assumptions in the existing literature on the financialization of living beings. According to the findings, the financialization of living beings has been studied mainly from the perspective of three different theoretical traditions: 1) Foucauldian-inspired tradition of biopolitics and governmentality 2) ANT-inspired performativity and 3) financialization as a mode of Marxist capital accumulation. In addition, this paper identifies factors that enable and hamper the financialization process. By reviewing different disciplines, this paper suggests new and more holistic ways to study the financialization of living beings in critical accounting research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Perspectives on Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235424000388/pdfft?md5=1329e6c98dceceb7742a27016290a450&pid=1-s2.0-S1045235424000388-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Perspectives on Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235424000388\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235424000388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了金融逻辑和推理在生物估值实践中的传播情况。本文有两个目的。首先,通过文献综述,本文旨在将批判性会计研究与涉及生物金融化的其他学科联系起来。第二个目的是跨学科的,因为其目的是对以往金融化文献中对生物的不同处理方式提出质疑。与以往的金融化文献不同,本文采用多物种方法,承认所有生物之间复杂的相互依存关系。本文采用的研究方法是 "问题化回顾"(problematizing review),这种方法使研究者能够重新思考和解构现有文献中关于生物金融化的主流假设。研究结果表明,对生物金融化的研究主要来自三种不同的理论传统:1) 福柯尔德(Foucauldian)启发的生物政治学和政府性传统;2) ANT 启发的表演性;3) 作为马克思主义资本积累模式的金融化。此外,本文还指出了促成和阻碍金融化进程的因素。通过对不同学科的回顾,本文提出了在批判性会计研究中研究生物金融化的更全面的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A problematizing review of the financialization of living beings

This paper examines the spread of financial logic and reasoning into the valuation practices by which living beings are valued. The purpose is two-fold. First, by conducting a literature review, the paper aims to connect critical accounting studies and other disciplines that address the financialization of living beings. The second purpose is cross-disciplinary as the aim is to problematize the disparate treatment of living beings in the previous financialization literature. In contrast to the previous financialization literature, this paper takes a multispecies approach by acknowledging the complex interdependences between all living beings. The research method used is a problematizing review, which enables the researcher to rethink and deconstruct dominant assumptions in the existing literature on the financialization of living beings. According to the findings, the financialization of living beings has been studied mainly from the perspective of three different theoretical traditions: 1) Foucauldian-inspired tradition of biopolitics and governmentality 2) ANT-inspired performativity and 3) financialization as a mode of Marxist capital accumulation. In addition, this paper identifies factors that enable and hamper the financialization process. By reviewing different disciplines, this paper suggests new and more holistic ways to study the financialization of living beings in critical accounting research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Critical Perspectives on Accounting aims to provide a forum for the growing number of accounting researchers and practitioners who realize that conventional theory and practice is ill-suited to the challenges of the modern environment, and that accounting practices and corporate behavior are inextricably connected with many allocative, distributive, social, and ecological problems of our era. From such concerns, a new literature is emerging that seeks to reformulate corporate, social, and political activity, and the theoretical and practical means by which we apprehend and affect that activity. Research Areas Include: • Studies involving the political economy of accounting, critical accounting, radical accounting, and accounting''s implication in the exercise of power • Financial accounting''s role in the processes of international capital formation, including its impact on stock market stability and international banking activities • Management accounting''s role in organizing the labor process • The relationship between accounting and the state in various social formations • Studies of accounting''s historical role, as a means of "remembering" the subject''s social and conflictual character • The role of accounting in establishing "real" democracy at work and other domains of life • Accounting''s adjudicative function in international exchanges, such as that of the Third World debt • Antagonisms between the social and private character of accounting, such as conflicts of interest in the audit process • The identification of new constituencies for radical and critical accounting information • Accounting''s involvement in gender and class conflicts in the workplace • The interplay between accounting, social conflict, industrialization, bureaucracy, and technocracy • Reappraisals of the role of accounting as a science and technology • Critical reviews of "useful" scientific knowledge about organizations
期刊最新文献
Diversity, dialogic pedagogy and intersubjectivity in the classroom: Contributions from the Global South Mediating ESG: Mapping individual responses to a changing field Therapeutic governance: The art of mediating shame and blame and quasi-judicial pragmatic technologies in Indonesian government auditor-auditee engagements Environmental accounting: In communicating reality, do we construct reality? Director and shareholder interactions at shareholder meetings: Compromising accountability in the service of colonialism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1