With access to consumer credit normalised in contemporary financial life, lenders use credit ratings to assess the risk of lending to potential borrowers and to determine appropriate rates of interest. Informed by the related themes of financial literacy, financial vulnerability, and financial resilience, this paper explores the dynamics of consumer engagement with opaque credit rating systems. To access affordable credit, consumers need to be disciplined in managing their finances so that they can build a good credit rating. However, the opaqueness of credit rating algorithms and the surveillant aspects of the credit system can lead to panopticism, with consumers required to navigate between controlling their credit ratings, while sometimes lacking the information to do so effectively. Using a Foucauldian lens, ideas from folk theory and drawing on data from 79 in-depth interviews, the implications of this panoptic tension and of governmentality for consumers’ financial wellbeing are revealed. A theoretical contribution is made to understanding how consumers develop the practical knowledge needed to manage their credit rating, leading to implications for policy and practice regarding the need for transparency in the credit rating system and credit decision-making.
{"title":"Risking it all: Consumer vulnerability and the credit rating panopticon","authors":"Hussan Aslam , Sally Dibb , Lindsey Appleyard , John Morris","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102844","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102844","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With access to consumer credit normalised in contemporary financial life, lenders use credit ratings to assess the risk of lending to potential borrowers and to determine appropriate rates of interest. Informed by the related themes of financial literacy, financial vulnerability, and financial resilience, this paper explores the dynamics of consumer engagement with opaque credit rating systems. To access affordable credit, consumers need to be disciplined in managing their finances so that they can build a good credit rating. However, the opaqueness of credit rating algorithms and the surveillant aspects of the credit system can lead to panopticism, with consumers required to navigate between controlling their credit ratings, while sometimes lacking the information to do so effectively. Using a Foucauldian lens, ideas from folk theory and drawing on data from 79 in-depth interviews, the implications of this panoptic tension and of governmentality for consumers’ financial wellbeing are revealed. A theoretical contribution is made to understanding how consumers develop the practical knowledge needed to manage their credit rating, leading to implications for policy and practice regarding the need for transparency in the credit rating system and credit decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102844"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102845
Erin J. Twyford
This paper interrogates the condition of critical accounting scholarship through Albert Camus’s notion of the absurd: the clash between our longing for meaning and the institutional indifference that greets it. I argue that we have become Sisyphean academics, pushing the boulder of emancipatory critique up the mountain of academic legitimacy, only to see it roll back down through metrics, rankings, and performative rituals. This absurdity is structured by impact factors, careerism, and a research economy that both demands critique and disarms it. Drawing on debates within the field, I suggest that critical accounting risks devolving into an ouroboros, endlessly consuming its own critique while retreating into narcissism and ritualised lament. Against this, I propose we engage in ‘lucid revolt’, a posture of honesty grounded in the refusal to look away. In an era where truth has become contested terrain, honesty becomes a form of resistance. This means naming what power seeks to obscure and recognising that even small acts of resistance matter. Revolt here is less about the promise of transformation than about learning to love the boulder. To persist with care and solidarity, to carry its weight together, and to find meaning in the act of pushing even when the summit will never be reached.
{"title":"Revolt(ing) rituals: Critical accounting and the honesty we owe","authors":"Erin J. Twyford","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102845","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102845","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper interrogates the condition of critical accounting scholarship through Albert Camus’s notion of the absurd: the clash between our longing for meaning and the institutional indifference that greets it. I argue that we have become Sisyphean academics, pushing the boulder of emancipatory critique up the mountain of academic legitimacy, only to see it roll back down through metrics, rankings, and performative rituals. This absurdity is structured by impact factors, careerism, and a research economy that both demands critique and disarms it. Drawing on debates within the field, I suggest that critical accounting risks devolving into an ouroboros, endlessly consuming its own critique while retreating into narcissism and ritualised lament. Against this, I propose we engage in ‘lucid revolt’, a posture of honesty grounded in the refusal to look away. In an era where truth has become contested terrain, honesty becomes a form of resistance. This means naming what power seeks to obscure and recognising that even small acts of resistance matter. Revolt here is less about the promise of transformation than about learning to love the boulder. To persist with care and solidarity, to carry its weight together, and to find meaning in the act of pushing even when the summit will never be reached.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102845"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102843
Bino Catasús
This paper explores how frustration emerges, accumulates, and lingers in everyday work under contemporary regimes of control. I show how contradictory approaches to governing intersect and clash in subtle and often unnoticed ways. Drawing on reflexive autoethnographic vignettes from a Swedish university, I approach the frustrations of being controlled as an affective condition produced by the layered and paradoxical structure of control. This frustration is not spectacular or rebellious; it is mundane, embodied, and continuous, showing that affects such as frustration are central to understanding what it means to be governed. The paper also shows how frustration is bound up with the impossibility of meeting three simultaneous pressures: professional ambition, performance expectations, and procedural requirements.
The paper contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it conceptualizes governance as a socio-technical and affective practice. Multiple and contradictory ambitions embedded in control systems create a recurring rhythm through which governance is felt, with frustration forming its affective pulse. Second, it shows how frustration builds through the structural incompatibility of ambition, performance, and procedure, generating a steady, low-intensity sense of falling short even when work is carried out with care and commitment. Third, the paper reframes frustration as inwardly directed work rather than a precursor to resistance. Instead of mobilizing opposition, frustration produces self-adjustment, workaround practices, and affective depletion, becoming an internal mode through which governance operates. Frustration is not a reaction to failed control but a recurring rhythm of governance – a repeated pulse through which governance endures.
{"title":"Affects as the rhythm of governance – An autoethnography of being controlled","authors":"Bino Catasús","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102843","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102843","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores how frustration emerges, accumulates, and lingers in everyday work under contemporary regimes of control. I show how contradictory approaches to governing intersect and clash in subtle and often unnoticed ways. Drawing on reflexive autoethnographic vignettes from a Swedish university, I approach the frustrations of being controlled as an affective condition produced by the layered and paradoxical structure of control. This frustration is not spectacular or rebellious; it is mundane, embodied, and continuous, showing that affects such as frustration are central to understanding what it means to be governed. The paper also shows how frustration is bound up with the impossibility of meeting three simultaneous pressures: professional ambition, performance expectations, and procedural requirements.</div><div>The paper contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it conceptualizes governance as a socio-technical and affective practice. Multiple and contradictory ambitions embedded in control systems create a recurring rhythm through which governance is felt, with frustration forming its affective pulse. Second, it shows how frustration builds through the structural incompatibility of ambition, performance, and procedure, generating a steady, low-intensity sense of falling short even when work is carried out with care and commitment. Third, the paper reframes frustration as inwardly directed work rather than a precursor to resistance. Instead of mobilizing opposition, frustration produces self-adjustment, workaround practices, and affective depletion, becoming an internal mode through which governance operates. Frustration is not a reaction to failed control but a recurring rhythm of governance – a repeated pulse through which governance endures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102843"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146077617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-10DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102842
Waksh Awais , Michele Bigoni
Research has shown how accounting is an important tool in the weaponry of colonial and neocolonial powers. However, less is known on how accounting education can be a means to ensure the silent reproduction of Western values and priorities. This study explores the relationship between current arrangements in university accounting education in Pakistan and neocolonialism. The paper is based on interviews with the three main categories of actors who have an impact on higher education, namely accounting policymakers, educators and students, and adopts Gramsci’s understanding of hegemony and the role of intellectuals in society. Policymakers, who enjoy strong ties with large multinational corporations, through accreditation mechanisms influence the meanings and content of accounting education, which educators then transmit to students, thereby altering their ‘common sense’. Consistently, many students are influenced by beliefs such as the primacy of the West and its ‘neutral’ practices and the need to embrace internationalisation. Nevertheless, others refuse such taken for granted assumptions and act as potential ‘organic intellectuals’, who may fuel the creation of new understandings around the role and content of accounting education in developing countries.
{"title":"Accounting education and neocolonialism in Pakistan: A Gramscian perspective","authors":"Waksh Awais , Michele Bigoni","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102842","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2026.102842","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research has shown how accounting is an important tool in the weaponry of colonial and neocolonial powers. However, less is known on how accounting education can be a means to ensure the silent reproduction of Western values and priorities. This study explores the relationship between current arrangements in university accounting education in Pakistan and neocolonialism. The paper is based on interviews with the three main categories of actors who have an impact on higher education, namely accounting policymakers, educators and students, and adopts Gramsci’s understanding of hegemony and the role of intellectuals in society. Policymakers, who enjoy strong ties with large multinational corporations, through accreditation mechanisms influence the meanings and content of accounting education, which educators then transmit to students, thereby altering their ‘common sense’. Consistently, many students are influenced by beliefs such as the primacy of the West and its ‘neutral’ practices and the need to embrace internationalisation. Nevertheless, others refuse such taken for granted assumptions and act as potential ‘organic intellectuals’, who may fuel the creation of new understandings around the role and content of accounting education in developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102842"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145925060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-25DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102840
Hannele Mäkelä , Oana Apostol , Eija Vinnari
As academics actively involved in teaching and researching accounting for the natural environment and nonhuman animals in our home institutions, we often experience mixed feelings on the meaningfulness and usefulness of our educational and scholarly activities. We take this Special Issue as an opportunity to reflect on the feelings of cognitive dissonance we experience when trying to respond to the urgency posed by multiple ecological crises. We complement our reflections through real-life examples from our professional experience that illustrate misalignments between our ecologically driven values and our actions. We hope that our exploration of the coping strategies adopted to navigate such inconsistencies will spark further discussion in the academic world.
{"title":"Coping with cognitive dissonance in critical environmental accounting research and education","authors":"Hannele Mäkelä , Oana Apostol , Eija Vinnari","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102840","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102840","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As academics actively involved in teaching and researching accounting for the natural environment and nonhuman animals in our home institutions, we often experience mixed feelings on the meaningfulness and usefulness of our educational and scholarly activities. We take this Special Issue as an opportunity to reflect on the feelings of cognitive dissonance we experience when trying to respond to the urgency posed by multiple ecological crises. We complement our reflections through real-life examples from our professional experience that illustrate misalignments between our ecologically driven values and our actions. We hope that our exploration of the coping strategies adopted to navigate such inconsistencies will spark further discussion in the academic world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102840"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145839936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102841
Peni Tupou Fukofuka , Sue Yong
Much of the existing literature, even when seeking emancipation, continues to reproduce a colonial tone by positioning Indigenous peoples primarily as subjects of domination and in need of liberation. Our study deliberately challenges this tendency by examining the accounting experiences of Aboriginal peoples within two Australian Indigenous corporations, Aroma and Fairwind, in a way that emphasizes reciprocity and shared vulnerability. Through a qualitative field study design, and drawing on Bourdieu’s gift theory, we argue that accounting practices constrain both Indigenous and non-Indigenous actors alike, thereby destabilizing the colonial narrative that frames Indigenous people solely as dominated. Instead, our findings suggest that emancipation must be conceived inclusively, extending beyond Indigenous communities to all who are subjected to the disciplining effects of accounting. While our stories echo the literature on the marginalization of Indigenous peoples through accounting, they also reveal how Indigenous participants identify the everyday oppressions experienced by those in mainstream society. In offering this recognition back to us, they provide what can be understood as a “gift”—a perspective that unsettles the usual tendency of the literature by highlighting the shared conditions of constraint and the possibilities for collective emancipation.
{"title":"Indigenous peoples and accounting. The gift of mutual emancipation","authors":"Peni Tupou Fukofuka , Sue Yong","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102841","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102841","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Much of the existing literature, even when seeking emancipation, continues to reproduce a colonial tone by positioning Indigenous peoples primarily as subjects of domination and in need of liberation. Our study deliberately challenges this tendency by examining the accounting experiences of Aboriginal peoples within two Australian Indigenous corporations, Aroma and Fairwind, in a way that emphasizes reciprocity and shared vulnerability. Through a qualitative field study design, and drawing on Bourdieu’s gift theory, we argue that accounting practices constrain both Indigenous and non-Indigenous actors alike, thereby destabilizing the colonial narrative that frames Indigenous people solely as dominated. Instead, our findings suggest that emancipation must be conceived inclusively, extending beyond Indigenous communities to all who are subjected to the disciplining effects of accounting. While our stories echo the literature on the marginalization of Indigenous peoples through accounting, they also reveal how Indigenous participants identify the everyday oppressions experienced by those in mainstream society. In offering this recognition back to us, they provide what can be understood as a “gift”—a perspective that unsettles the usual tendency of the literature by highlighting the shared conditions of constraint and the possibilities for collective emancipation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102841"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145839935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102838
Malilimalo Phaswana, Gizelle D. Willows
Black Tax is a common phenomenon in South Africa, where individuals provide financial support to their family members. This practice is often viewed as being detrimental to Black middle-class South Africans’ financial wellbeing and upward social mobility. This study offers an alternative perspective by examining the cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence the financial support landscape. African values of Ubuntu, which emphasise collectivism and mutual solidarity, play a key role in facilitating familial support and providing fulfilment for those who can provide help. The high levels of poverty and inequality in South Africa are also shown to necessitate familial support where the state does not provide adequate assistance. This study employs the oral history method to obtain the perspectives of familial financial support from five families of the amaXhosa tribe in Cape Town. Through multiple perspective interviews, in-depth accounts of the experiences and events that shaped financial support flows within these families are gathered and presented. Results show that cultural influences and socioeconomic factors shaped each family in unique ways across common themes that are representative of Black South Africans. This study contributes to the literature by providing a South African perspective to the global conversation, which is key because of the country’s notable history of colonialism and apartheid.
{"title":"Black tax – stories of familial financial support in Cape Town","authors":"Malilimalo Phaswana, Gizelle D. Willows","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102838","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102838","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Black Tax is a common phenomenon in South Africa, where individuals provide financial support to their family members. This practice is often viewed as being detrimental to Black middle-class South Africans’ financial wellbeing and upward social mobility. This study offers an alternative perspective by examining the cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence the financial support landscape. African values of <em>Ubuntu,</em> which emphasise collectivism and mutual solidarity<em>,</em> play a key role in facilitating familial support and providing fulfilment for those who can provide help. The high levels of poverty and inequality in South Africa are also shown to necessitate familial support where the state does not provide adequate assistance. This study employs the oral history method to obtain the perspectives of familial financial support from five families of the amaXhosa tribe in Cape Town. Through multiple perspective interviews, in-depth accounts of the experiences and events that shaped financial support flows within these families are gathered and presented. Results show that cultural influences and socioeconomic factors shaped each family in unique ways across common themes that are representative of Black South Africans. This study contributes to the literature by providing a South African perspective to the global conversation, which is key because of the country’s notable history of colonialism and apartheid.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102838"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102837
Afshin Mehrpouya , Julien Malaurent
In this paper, relying on a qualitative study of the Chinese Social Credit System (SCS), we explore how performance measurement is being mobilized to enact a moral regime to guide citizens’ behavior. Basing our analysis on governmentality studies in general but also studies of governmentality regimes in post-reform China, we conceptualize the techniques of government mobilized in SCS to normalize traditional civic value of trust (Chengxin) amalgamated with market value of creditworthiness. We discuss how under SCS, three visual regimes are at work, the Panoptic, the Synoptic and what we term the Alloptic. The first, the Panoptic gaze involves algorithmic and diffuse surveillance of citizens’ behavior backed by a regime of reward and punishment, the second, the Synoptic gaze is about guiding the gaze of citizens to the stories and images of model citizens, and the third, what we term the ‘Alloptic’ gaze others the “untrustworthy” citizens under the shaming gaze of the mobile, unknown community shadowing them in their physical movements and online. We discuss how algorithmic governance enables such a coming together of the three gazes in a dynamic and highly uncertain nexus of visibility wherein the contours of the regime, and the purveyor of the othering/shaming gaze are changing and unknown. We discuss the implications of our study for analysis of governance in other settings – especially considering the rise of illiberalism in conjunction with new technologies or what has been termed “techno-fascism” particularly in the US, but also throughout the world.
{"title":"Morality as performance: Studying the rise of performance measurement in citizen governance through the case of Chinese Social Credit System","authors":"Afshin Mehrpouya , Julien Malaurent","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102837","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102837","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, relying on a qualitative study of the Chinese Social Credit System (SCS), we explore how performance measurement is being mobilized to enact a moral regime to guide citizens’ behavior. Basing our analysis on governmentality studies in general but also studies of governmentality regimes in post-reform China, we conceptualize the techniques of government mobilized in SCS to normalize traditional civic value of trust (Chengxin) amalgamated with market value of creditworthiness. We discuss how under SCS, three visual regimes are at work, the Panoptic, the Synoptic and what we term the Alloptic. The first, the Panoptic gaze involves algorithmic and diffuse surveillance of citizens’ behavior backed by a regime of reward and punishment, the second, the Synoptic gaze is about guiding the gaze of citizens to the stories and images of model citizens, and the third, what we term the ‘Alloptic’ gaze others the “untrustworthy” citizens under the shaming gaze of the mobile, unknown community shadowing them in their physical movements and online. We discuss how algorithmic governance enables such a coming together of the three gazes in a dynamic and highly uncertain nexus of visibility wherein the contours of the regime, and the purveyor of the othering/shaming gaze are changing and unknown. We discuss the implications of our study for analysis of governance in other settings – especially considering the rise of illiberalism in conjunction with new technologies or what has been termed “techno-fascism” particularly in the US, but also throughout the world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102837"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102839
Roberta Adami , Liam Foster
The individualisation of risk and responsibility for retirement planning, with the requirement to make ‘good saving decisions’, is an essential feature of the financialisation of pensions. Individuals are encouraged to become active financial subjects to ensure their own economic welfare. Additionally, concepts such as individual responsibility, risk management and financial planning are presented as moral obligations. This narrative has become an intrinsic part of neoliberal policies implemented over the last four decades in the UK, aimed at further privatising retirement. This paper examines the views and attitudes of young women towards individual responsibility and risk, within the context of retirement planning in the UK. The study presents a gendered analysis of financialisation of the pension system. It draws from the concept of ‘individual investor’ to critically discuss its shortcomings, using interviews and a focus group with young British women. The findings show how deep-rooted the idea of personal responsibility is amongst respondents, but also that the concept of managing risk and uncertainty is not adequately recognised, despite its centrality to investment practices.
{"title":"Normalising individual responsibility? A gendered study of retirement planning in a financialised system","authors":"Roberta Adami , Liam Foster","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102839","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102839","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The individualisation of risk and responsibility for retirement planning, with the requirement to make ‘good saving decisions’, is an essential feature of the financialisation of pensions. Individuals are encouraged to become active financial subjects to ensure their own economic welfare. Additionally, concepts such as individual responsibility, risk management and financial planning are presented as moral obligations. This narrative has become an intrinsic part of neoliberal policies implemented over the last four decades in the UK, aimed at further privatising retirement. This paper examines the views and attitudes of young women towards individual responsibility and risk, within the context of retirement planning in the UK. The study presents a gendered analysis of financialisation of the pension system. It draws from the concept of ‘individual investor’ to critically discuss its shortcomings, using interviews and a focus group with young British women. The findings show how deep-rooted the idea of personal responsibility is amongst respondents, but also that the concept of managing risk and uncertainty is not adequately recognised, despite its centrality to investment practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102839"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102836
Valerio Antonelli , Roberto Rossi
Recently, scholars have paid increasing attention to accounting academics’ lives and work. The analysis of the relationships between academics and politicians is certainly of interest, if we remove the assumptions of a clear separation between the two that are assumed to underpin research in this field.
This study aims to elucidate the role played by Italian accounting academics in national political institutions, considering those elected to Parliament and/or holding a role in the Italian Government, under the Fascist regime and the ‘First Republic’. To this end, it analyses the academic and political fields and the relationships between the two through a Bourdieusian approach, highlighting how these fields are intertwined and how forms of capital can be transferred from one to another. Drawing on primary sources, the study employs a collective biography approach, focusing on five pivotal academics who served as parliamentarians and ministers from 1933 to 1992. Based on this evidence, it argues that accounting academics can play a crucial role by transferring their academic capital to the political field and mobilising the power of theories to serve the objectives of intervention in the economy and society, while political capital can also be an important source of academic capital growth. Thus, this study situates the relationships between the academic and political fields in a subfield–field theoretical perspective, thereby contributing to the literature on the role of accounting academics and their impact on the economy, society, and politics.
{"title":"Accounting academics and political engagement. Professors as parliamentarians and ministers in Italy","authors":"Valerio Antonelli , Roberto Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102836","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102836","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, scholars have paid increasing attention to accounting academics’ lives and work. The analysis of the relationships between academics and politicians is certainly of interest, if we remove the assumptions of a clear separation between the two that are assumed to underpin research in this field.</div><div>This study aims to elucidate the role played by Italian accounting academics in national political institutions, considering those elected to Parliament and/or holding a role in the Italian Government, under the Fascist regime and the ‘First Republic’. To this end, it analyses the academic and political fields and the relationships between the two through a Bourdieusian approach, highlighting how these fields are intertwined and how forms of capital can be transferred from one to another. Drawing on primary sources, the study employs a collective biography approach, focusing on five pivotal academics who served as parliamentarians and ministers from 1933 to 1992. Based on this evidence, it argues that accounting academics can play a crucial role by transferring their academic capital to the political field and mobilising the power of theories to serve the objectives of intervention in the economy and society, while political capital can also be an important source of academic capital growth. Thus, this study situates the relationships between the academic and political fields in a subfield–field theoretical perspective, thereby contributing to the literature on the role of accounting academics and their impact on the economy, society, and politics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48078,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Accounting","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102836"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145685031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}