{"title":"因怀疑患有冠状动脉疾病而接受冠状动脉造影术的患者中左乳内动脉疾病的患病率:荟萃分析和荟萃回归研究","authors":"Luca Franchin , Federico Angriman , Luca Siega Vignut , Massimo Imazio","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to bypass left anterior descending artery has demonstrated to improve survival in multivessel coronary artery disease, but its routine angiography during index coronary angiography is seldom performed as LIMA is rarely diseased.</p><p>A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases selecting the studies reporting prevalence of LIMA disease among patients undergoing coronary angiography and considered for CABG. Meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prevalence of LIMA disease and the relative predictive value of canonical risk factors. After scrimmage, 9 studies for a total of 1365 patients were included.</p><p>LIMA disease prevalence was 1.8 % (95 % CI; 1.2 %-2.8 %) in the entire cohort, whereas we reported a rate of subclavian artery disease of 7.6 % (95 % CI, 6–9.9 %). At univariate meta-regression analysis, only age (<em>p</em> = 0.031) and smoking habit (<em>p</em> = 0.035) were directly correlated with LIMA disease.</p><p>In conclusion, LIMA angiographic assessment might be considered in selected patients that could undergo CABG, during index coronary angiography. However, prospective studies are needed to better evaluate the safety of routine selective LIMA angiography prior to CABG and whether the practice is associated with improved clinical outcomes among those individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000454/pdfft?md5=f1a431c5964c2bfa8a9af5e93078edc4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666602224000454-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of left internal mammary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis and meta-regression study\",\"authors\":\"Luca Franchin , Federico Angriman , Luca Siega Vignut , Massimo Imazio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to bypass left anterior descending artery has demonstrated to improve survival in multivessel coronary artery disease, but its routine angiography during index coronary angiography is seldom performed as LIMA is rarely diseased.</p><p>A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases selecting the studies reporting prevalence of LIMA disease among patients undergoing coronary angiography and considered for CABG. Meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prevalence of LIMA disease and the relative predictive value of canonical risk factors. After scrimmage, 9 studies for a total of 1365 patients were included.</p><p>LIMA disease prevalence was 1.8 % (95 % CI; 1.2 %-2.8 %) in the entire cohort, whereas we reported a rate of subclavian artery disease of 7.6 % (95 % CI, 6–9.9 %). At univariate meta-regression analysis, only age (<em>p</em> = 0.031) and smoking habit (<em>p</em> = 0.035) were directly correlated with LIMA disease.</p><p>In conclusion, LIMA angiographic assessment might be considered in selected patients that could undergo CABG, during index coronary angiography. However, prospective studies are needed to better evaluate the safety of routine selective LIMA angiography prior to CABG and whether the practice is associated with improved clinical outcomes among those individuals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000454/pdfft?md5=f1a431c5964c2bfa8a9af5e93078edc4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666602224000454-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224000454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究人员使用 PubMed 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了系统性文献综述和荟萃分析,选择了报告接受冠状动脉造影术并考虑进行 CABG 的患者中 LIMA 患病率的研究。元回归分析用于评估 LIMA 疾病的患病率和典型风险因素的相对预测价值。在整个队列中,LIMA 疾病的患病率为 1.8%(95% CI;1.2%-2.8%),而我们报告的锁骨下动脉疾病患病率为 7.6%(95% CI,6%-9.9%)。在单变量元回归分析中,只有年龄(p = 0.031)和吸烟习惯(p = 0.035)与 LIMA 病变直接相关。然而,还需要进行前瞻性研究,以更好地评估在接受 CABG 之前常规选择性进行 LIMA 血管造影的安全性,以及这种做法是否会改善这些患者的临床预后。
Prevalence of left internal mammary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis and meta-regression study
Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to bypass left anterior descending artery has demonstrated to improve survival in multivessel coronary artery disease, but its routine angiography during index coronary angiography is seldom performed as LIMA is rarely diseased.
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases selecting the studies reporting prevalence of LIMA disease among patients undergoing coronary angiography and considered for CABG. Meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prevalence of LIMA disease and the relative predictive value of canonical risk factors. After scrimmage, 9 studies for a total of 1365 patients were included.
LIMA disease prevalence was 1.8 % (95 % CI; 1.2 %-2.8 %) in the entire cohort, whereas we reported a rate of subclavian artery disease of 7.6 % (95 % CI, 6–9.9 %). At univariate meta-regression analysis, only age (p = 0.031) and smoking habit (p = 0.035) were directly correlated with LIMA disease.
In conclusion, LIMA angiographic assessment might be considered in selected patients that could undergo CABG, during index coronary angiography. However, prospective studies are needed to better evaluate the safety of routine selective LIMA angiography prior to CABG and whether the practice is associated with improved clinical outcomes among those individuals.