关于 U 型管和同轴钻孔热交换器间歇运行的数值研究

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geothermics Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103030
B.E. Harris , M.F. Lightstone , S. Reitsma , J.S. Cotton
{"title":"关于 U 型管和同轴钻孔热交换器间歇运行的数值研究","authors":"B.E. Harris ,&nbsp;M.F. Lightstone ,&nbsp;S. Reitsma ,&nbsp;J.S. Cotton","doi":"10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study provides a comprehensive investigation into the impact of intermittent operation on two borehole designs: coaxial and u-tube heat exchangers. Previous studies have compared borehole heat exchanger (BHE) designs and others have investigated the impact of intermittent parameters; this study provides a systematic analysis of the intersection between intermittency and design. Using detailed numerical models of a coaxial and u-tube heat exchanger, intermittent operating duration, recovery time, and duty cycle were explored. These simulations demonstrated the importance of operating time scales. Findings showed that operating for durations smaller than the transit time (the time needed for fluid to travel the full length of the heat exchanger) provided performance benefits in the u-tube over the coaxial design, due to the limited thermal interaction between inlet and outlet flows in the u-tube. At operating scales above its transit time, however, the coaxial heat exchanger performed up to 12.9% better than the u-tube, with most benefit observed for operation durations close to the transit time. Additionally, the results showed little difference during operation between the two heat exchangers when varying recovery times. Furthermore, an assessment of the duty cycle demonstrated that a high ratio of recovery to operating time at low operating durations provided the greatest performance benefit. These findings highlight the need to model heat exchanger response over all time scales in order to accurately predict performance under intermittent operating conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55095,"journal":{"name":"Geothermics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A numerical study on the intermittent operation of u-tube and coaxial borehole heat exchangers\",\"authors\":\"B.E. Harris ,&nbsp;M.F. Lightstone ,&nbsp;S. Reitsma ,&nbsp;J.S. Cotton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study provides a comprehensive investigation into the impact of intermittent operation on two borehole designs: coaxial and u-tube heat exchangers. Previous studies have compared borehole heat exchanger (BHE) designs and others have investigated the impact of intermittent parameters; this study provides a systematic analysis of the intersection between intermittency and design. Using detailed numerical models of a coaxial and u-tube heat exchanger, intermittent operating duration, recovery time, and duty cycle were explored. These simulations demonstrated the importance of operating time scales. Findings showed that operating for durations smaller than the transit time (the time needed for fluid to travel the full length of the heat exchanger) provided performance benefits in the u-tube over the coaxial design, due to the limited thermal interaction between inlet and outlet flows in the u-tube. At operating scales above its transit time, however, the coaxial heat exchanger performed up to 12.9% better than the u-tube, with most benefit observed for operation durations close to the transit time. Additionally, the results showed little difference during operation between the two heat exchangers when varying recovery times. Furthermore, an assessment of the duty cycle demonstrated that a high ratio of recovery to operating time at low operating durations provided the greatest performance benefit. These findings highlight the need to model heat exchanger response over all time scales in order to accurately predict performance under intermittent operating conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geothermics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geothermics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375650524001196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geothermics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375650524001196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究全面调查了间歇运行对两种井眼设计的影响:同轴和 U 形管换热器。之前的研究比较了钻孔换热器(BHE)的设计,其他研究则调查了间歇参数的影响;本研究对间歇与设计之间的交叉点进行了系统分析。利用同轴和 U 型管热交换器的详细数值模型,探讨了间歇运行时间、恢复时间和占空比。这些模拟证明了运行时间尺度的重要性。研究结果表明,与同轴设计相比,U 形管的运行持续时间小于传输时间(流体流经热交换器全长所需的时间),这是因为 U 形管的入口流和出口流之间的热相互作用有限。不过,在运行时间超过其传输时间的情况下,同轴热交换器的性能比 U 形管高出 12.9%,在运行时间接近传输时间的情况下获益最大。此外,结果表明,在不同的回收时间内,两种热交换器的运行性能差别不大。此外,对占空比的评估表明,在低运行持续时间下,回收时间与运行时间的高比率能带来最大的性能优势。这些发现突出表明,为了准确预测间歇运行条件下的性能,有必要对热交换器在所有时间尺度上的响应进行建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A numerical study on the intermittent operation of u-tube and coaxial borehole heat exchangers

This study provides a comprehensive investigation into the impact of intermittent operation on two borehole designs: coaxial and u-tube heat exchangers. Previous studies have compared borehole heat exchanger (BHE) designs and others have investigated the impact of intermittent parameters; this study provides a systematic analysis of the intersection between intermittency and design. Using detailed numerical models of a coaxial and u-tube heat exchanger, intermittent operating duration, recovery time, and duty cycle were explored. These simulations demonstrated the importance of operating time scales. Findings showed that operating for durations smaller than the transit time (the time needed for fluid to travel the full length of the heat exchanger) provided performance benefits in the u-tube over the coaxial design, due to the limited thermal interaction between inlet and outlet flows in the u-tube. At operating scales above its transit time, however, the coaxial heat exchanger performed up to 12.9% better than the u-tube, with most benefit observed for operation durations close to the transit time. Additionally, the results showed little difference during operation between the two heat exchangers when varying recovery times. Furthermore, an assessment of the duty cycle demonstrated that a high ratio of recovery to operating time at low operating durations provided the greatest performance benefit. These findings highlight the need to model heat exchanger response over all time scales in order to accurately predict performance under intermittent operating conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geothermics
Geothermics 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geothermics is an international journal devoted to the research and development of geothermal energy. The International Board of Editors of Geothermics, which comprises specialists in the various aspects of geothermal resources, exploration and development, guarantees the balanced, comprehensive view of scientific and technological developments in this promising energy field. It promulgates the state of the art and science of geothermal energy, its exploration and exploitation through a regular exchange of information from all parts of the world. The journal publishes articles dealing with the theory, exploration techniques and all aspects of the utilization of geothermal resources. Geothermics serves as the scientific house, or exchange medium, through which the growing community of geothermal specialists can provide and receive information.
期刊最新文献
Numerical investigation of the geometric parameters effect of helical blades installed on horizontal geo heat exchanger A segmented analytical solution heat transfer model of U-tube ground heat exchanger based on finite solid cylindrical heat source method Geothermal distribution and evolution of fault-controlled Linyi geothermal system: Constrained from hydrogeochemical composition and numerical simulation Structural controls on hydrothermal fluid flow in a carbonate geothermal reservoir: Insights from giant carbonate veins in western Germany Experiences as heuristics for geothermal public perception: Testing the correlation between thermal waters recreation and geothermal energy perception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1