特罗非肽对雷特综合征患者疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1007/s10072-024-07584-8
Mohamed Abo Zeid, Amr Elrosasy, Rashad G Mohamed, Alina Ghazou, Elarbi Goufa, Nourhan Hassan, Yasmine Abuzaid
{"title":"特罗非肽对雷特综合征患者疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohamed Abo Zeid, Amr Elrosasy, Rashad G Mohamed, Alina Ghazou, Elarbi Goufa, Nourhan Hassan, Yasmine Abuzaid","doi":"10.1007/s10072-024-07584-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rett syndrome (RTT) is an uncommon inherited neurodevelopmental disorder that affects brain development, mostly in females. It results from mutation in MECP2 gene in the long arm (q) of the X chromosome.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Trofinetide is a recently developed drug that has a neuroprotective effect on neurons, and it is our aim in this meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating Rett syndrome patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Trofinetide and placebo in patients with Rett syndrome until August 13, 2023.Our primary outcomes were the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) and the Rett syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ). We used Risk of Bias Assessment tool-2 (ROB2) to assess the methodological quality of the included randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs with a total of 325 patients were included with a follow-up duration ranging from one month to three months. 186 patients received the intervention drug (Trofinetide) and 138 received the placebo. Trofinetide was found to reduce CGI and RSBQ significantly more than placebo (MD = -0.35, 95% CI [-0.52 to -0.18], P 0.0001), (MD = -3.40, 95% CI [-3.69 to -3.12], P 0.00001) respectively. Most adverse events did not show any statistical difference between Trofinetide and the placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trofinetide offers promise as a potential effective and safe therapeutic opportunity for a population without many available treatments, with improvements seen on both CGI and RSBQ assessments and no severe adverse effects reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11422260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of trofinetide in patients with rett syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abo Zeid, Amr Elrosasy, Rashad G Mohamed, Alina Ghazou, Elarbi Goufa, Nourhan Hassan, Yasmine Abuzaid\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-024-07584-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rett syndrome (RTT) is an uncommon inherited neurodevelopmental disorder that affects brain development, mostly in females. It results from mutation in MECP2 gene in the long arm (q) of the X chromosome.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Trofinetide is a recently developed drug that has a neuroprotective effect on neurons, and it is our aim in this meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating Rett syndrome patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Trofinetide and placebo in patients with Rett syndrome until August 13, 2023.Our primary outcomes were the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) and the Rett syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ). We used Risk of Bias Assessment tool-2 (ROB2) to assess the methodological quality of the included randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs with a total of 325 patients were included with a follow-up duration ranging from one month to three months. 186 patients received the intervention drug (Trofinetide) and 138 received the placebo. Trofinetide was found to reduce CGI and RSBQ significantly more than placebo (MD = -0.35, 95% CI [-0.52 to -0.18], P 0.0001), (MD = -3.40, 95% CI [-3.69 to -3.12], P 0.00001) respectively. Most adverse events did not show any statistical difference between Trofinetide and the placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trofinetide offers promise as a potential effective and safe therapeutic opportunity for a population without many available treatments, with improvements seen on both CGI and RSBQ assessments and no severe adverse effects reported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11422260/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07584-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07584-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍雷特综合征(RTT)是一种不常见的遗传性神经发育障碍疾病,主要影响女性的大脑发育。它是由 X 染色体长臂(q)上的 MECP2 基因突变引起的:特罗非肽是最近开发的一种对神经元有保护作用的药物,我们的目的是通过这项荟萃分析评估其治疗 Rett 综合征患者的有效性和安全性:我们检索了 5 个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库),以确定截至 2023 年 8 月 13 日在 Rett 综合征患者中比较特罗芬肽和安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们使用偏倚风险评估工具-2(ROB2)来评估纳入的随机对照试验的方法学质量:结果:共纳入了三项随机对照试验,共325名患者,随访时间从一个月到三个月不等。186名患者接受了干预药物(曲非奈德),138名患者接受了安慰剂。结果发现,特罗非肽对 CGI 和 RSBQ 的降低作用明显高于安慰剂(MD = -0.35,95% CI [-0.52 to -0.18],P 0.0001)和(MD = -3.40,95% CI [-3.69 to -3.12],P 0.00001)。大多数不良反应在特罗非肽和安慰剂之间没有统计学差异:特罗非奈肽有望为缺乏多种可用治疗方法的人群提供有效、安全的潜在治疗机会,CGI和RSBQ评估结果均有所改善,且无严重不良反应报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of trofinetide in patients with rett syndrome.

Background: Rett syndrome (RTT) is an uncommon inherited neurodevelopmental disorder that affects brain development, mostly in females. It results from mutation in MECP2 gene in the long arm (q) of the X chromosome.

Objective: Trofinetide is a recently developed drug that has a neuroprotective effect on neurons, and it is our aim in this meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating Rett syndrome patients.

Methods: We searched 5 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Trofinetide and placebo in patients with Rett syndrome until August 13, 2023.Our primary outcomes were the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) and the Rett syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ). We used Risk of Bias Assessment tool-2 (ROB2) to assess the methodological quality of the included randomized controlled trials.

Results: Three RCTs with a total of 325 patients were included with a follow-up duration ranging from one month to three months. 186 patients received the intervention drug (Trofinetide) and 138 received the placebo. Trofinetide was found to reduce CGI and RSBQ significantly more than placebo (MD = -0.35, 95% CI [-0.52 to -0.18], P 0.0001), (MD = -3.40, 95% CI [-3.69 to -3.12], P 0.00001) respectively. Most adverse events did not show any statistical difference between Trofinetide and the placebo.

Conclusion: Trofinetide offers promise as a potential effective and safe therapeutic opportunity for a population without many available treatments, with improvements seen on both CGI and RSBQ assessments and no severe adverse effects reported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic extracranial internal carotid artery vasospasm: case report and systematic review. Correction to: Effectiveness of combined robotics and virtual reality on lower limb functional ability in stroke survivors: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Aberrant functional connectivity associated with drug response in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. A non-linear relationship between blood pressure and mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals: A cohort study based on the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey (CLHLS). Alterations in spatiotemporal characteristics of dynamic networks in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1