评估放射性碘治疗副作用的唾液、泪腺和鼻腔(SALANS)测量方法:开发、心理测量特性和因子结构。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03684-2
Jacqueline Jonklaas, Alaina L Carr, George Luta, Chenlu Yu, Roxanne E Jensen, Emma Reasner, Justin Winslow, Charlene C Kuo, Bruce J Davidson, Giuseppe Esposito, Gary Bloom, Samantha A Diamond-Rossi, Kristi D Graves
{"title":"评估放射性碘治疗副作用的唾液、泪腺和鼻腔(SALANS)测量方法:开发、心理测量特性和因子结构。","authors":"Jacqueline Jonklaas, Alaina L Carr, George Luta, Chenlu Yu, Roxanne E Jensen, Emma Reasner, Justin Winslow, Charlene C Kuo, Bruce J Davidson, Giuseppe Esposito, Gary Bloom, Samantha A Diamond-Rossi, Kristi D Graves","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03684-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), SAlivary, LAcrimal, NaSal (SALANS), to document patients' symptoms after radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We generated and iteratively revised SALANS items based on expert input, focus group discussions and feedback from cognitive testing (n = 17). We administered an initial SALANS measure with 39 items to patients diagnosed with DTC in the past two years (n = 105). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) examined the factor structure of the SALANS items. We assessed the consistency reliability and related the total and subscale scores of the final SALANS to existing PROMs to assess validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final SALANS consisted of 33 items and six subscales (sialadenitis, taste, xerostomia, dry eyes, epiphora, and nasal) with six factors extracted by EFA. The six subscales demonstrated good internal reliability (α range = 0.87-0.92). The SALANS total score showed good convergent validity with the Xerostomia Inventory (r = 0.86) and good discriminant validity with a measure of spirituality (r =  - 0.05). The mean SALANS total score was significantly higher (d = 0.5, p < 0.04) among patients who had RAI compared to those who did not have RAI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary evidence suggests that SALANS is a novel and reliable PROM to assess the type and frequency all symptoms experienced after RAI treatment for DTC. Future work is needed to further validate and develop the scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salivary, lacrimal and nasal (SALANS) measure to assess side effects following radioactive iodine treatment: development, psychometric properties, and factor structure.\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Jonklaas, Alaina L Carr, George Luta, Chenlu Yu, Roxanne E Jensen, Emma Reasner, Justin Winslow, Charlene C Kuo, Bruce J Davidson, Giuseppe Esposito, Gary Bloom, Samantha A Diamond-Rossi, Kristi D Graves\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-024-03684-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), SAlivary, LAcrimal, NaSal (SALANS), to document patients' symptoms after radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We generated and iteratively revised SALANS items based on expert input, focus group discussions and feedback from cognitive testing (n = 17). We administered an initial SALANS measure with 39 items to patients diagnosed with DTC in the past two years (n = 105). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) examined the factor structure of the SALANS items. We assessed the consistency reliability and related the total and subscale scores of the final SALANS to existing PROMs to assess validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final SALANS consisted of 33 items and six subscales (sialadenitis, taste, xerostomia, dry eyes, epiphora, and nasal) with six factors extracted by EFA. The six subscales demonstrated good internal reliability (α range = 0.87-0.92). The SALANS total score showed good convergent validity with the Xerostomia Inventory (r = 0.86) and good discriminant validity with a measure of spirituality (r =  - 0.05). The mean SALANS total score was significantly higher (d = 0.5, p < 0.04) among patients who had RAI compared to those who did not have RAI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary evidence suggests that SALANS is a novel and reliable PROM to assess the type and frequency all symptoms experienced after RAI treatment for DTC. Future work is needed to further validate and develop the scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03684-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03684-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在开发一种名为 "SAlivary, LAcrimal, NaSal (SALANS) "的患者报告结果测量(PROM),并对其进行心理计量学评估,以记录分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者接受放射性碘(RAI)治疗后的症状:我们根据专家意见、焦点小组讨论和认知测试反馈(n = 17)生成并反复修订了 SALANS 项目。我们对过去两年中确诊为 DTC 的患者(n = 105)实施了包含 39 个项目的 SALANS 初始测量。探索性因子分析(EFA)检验了 SALANS 项目的因子结构。我们评估了 SALANS 的一致性可靠性,并将最终 SALANS 的总分和分量表得分与现有的 PROMs 相关联,以评估其有效性:最终的 SALANS 包括 33 个项目和六个分量表(唾液腺炎、味觉、口腔干燥症、干眼症、眼外胀和鼻腔),并通过 EFA 提取了六个因子。六个分量表显示出良好的内部信度(α 范围 = 0.87-0.92)。SALANS 总分与口腔干燥症量表(Xerostomia Inventory)具有良好的收敛效度(r = 0.86),与精神测量具有良好的区分效度(r = - 0.05)。SALANS 总分的平均值明显较高(d = 0.5,p 结论:SALANS 的平均值较高:初步证据表明,SALANS 是一种新颖可靠的 PROM,可用于评估 DTC RAI 治疗后所有症状的类型和频率。今后还需要进一步验证和开发该量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Salivary, lacrimal and nasal (SALANS) measure to assess side effects following radioactive iodine treatment: development, psychometric properties, and factor structure.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), SAlivary, LAcrimal, NaSal (SALANS), to document patients' symptoms after radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

Methods: We generated and iteratively revised SALANS items based on expert input, focus group discussions and feedback from cognitive testing (n = 17). We administered an initial SALANS measure with 39 items to patients diagnosed with DTC in the past two years (n = 105). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) examined the factor structure of the SALANS items. We assessed the consistency reliability and related the total and subscale scores of the final SALANS to existing PROMs to assess validity.

Results: The final SALANS consisted of 33 items and six subscales (sialadenitis, taste, xerostomia, dry eyes, epiphora, and nasal) with six factors extracted by EFA. The six subscales demonstrated good internal reliability (α range = 0.87-0.92). The SALANS total score showed good convergent validity with the Xerostomia Inventory (r = 0.86) and good discriminant validity with a measure of spirituality (r =  - 0.05). The mean SALANS total score was significantly higher (d = 0.5, p < 0.04) among patients who had RAI compared to those who did not have RAI.

Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests that SALANS is a novel and reliable PROM to assess the type and frequency all symptoms experienced after RAI treatment for DTC. Future work is needed to further validate and develop the scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life of women with a screen-detected versus clinically detected breast cancer in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study Chinese utility weights for the EORTC cancer-specific utility instrument QLU-C10D The effect of social care nurses on health related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: A non-randomized, multicenter, controlled trial The impact of demographic change on value set validity and obsolescence The performance relationship between the EQ-5D-5L composite “Anxiety/Depression” dimension and anxiety and depression symptoms in a large, general population sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1