欧姆龙 HEM-7361T 血压计区分心房颤动和窦性心律的准确性。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000706
Yi Zhou, Jia-Hui Xia, Wei Zhang, Yan Li, Ji-Guang Wang
{"title":"欧姆龙 HEM-7361T 血压计区分心房颤动和窦性心律的准确性。","authors":"Yi Zhou, Jia-Hui Xia, Wei Zhang, Yan Li, Ji-Guang Wang","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the accuracy of the OMRON HEM-7361T automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An approximately equal number of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and individuals with sinus rhythm were recruited from outpatients and inpatients of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. BP was measured three times consecutively with a 30-s interval with the OMRON HEM-7361T automatic electronic BP monitor for atrial fibrillation detection. A hand-held single lead electrocardiogram device was used for simultaneous electrocardiogram recordings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The device accurately identified atrial fibrillation in 100 (99.0%) of the 101 patients, with only 1 patient incorrectly classified as non-atrial fibrillation. The device correctly identified 99 (95.2%) of the 104 participants with sinus rhythm as non-atrial fibrillation, with five participants incorrectly classified as atrial fibrillation. The device had a positive predictive value of 95.2%, negative predictive value of 99.0%, and overall accuracy of 97.1%. Among the six misclassified participants, one with atrial fibrillation had a heart rate of 65 beats/min, and four of the five participants with sinus rhythm had cardiac arrhythmias (atrial or ventricular premature beat in one participants, sinus tachycardia in one participant, and both arrhythmias in one participant).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OMRON HEM-7361T BP monitor is accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. Whether the device is sufficiently accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and other cardiac arrhythmias remains under investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of the OMRON HEM-7361T blood pressure monitor in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Zhou, Jia-Hui Xia, Wei Zhang, Yan Li, Ji-Guang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the accuracy of the OMRON HEM-7361T automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An approximately equal number of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and individuals with sinus rhythm were recruited from outpatients and inpatients of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. BP was measured three times consecutively with a 30-s interval with the OMRON HEM-7361T automatic electronic BP monitor for atrial fibrillation detection. A hand-held single lead electrocardiogram device was used for simultaneous electrocardiogram recordings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The device accurately identified atrial fibrillation in 100 (99.0%) of the 101 patients, with only 1 patient incorrectly classified as non-atrial fibrillation. The device correctly identified 99 (95.2%) of the 104 participants with sinus rhythm as non-atrial fibrillation, with five participants incorrectly classified as atrial fibrillation. The device had a positive predictive value of 95.2%, negative predictive value of 99.0%, and overall accuracy of 97.1%. Among the six misclassified participants, one with atrial fibrillation had a heart rate of 65 beats/min, and four of the five participants with sinus rhythm had cardiac arrhythmias (atrial or ventricular premature beat in one participants, sinus tachycardia in one participant, and both arrhythmias in one participant).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OMRON HEM-7361T BP monitor is accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. Whether the device is sufficiently accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and other cardiac arrhythmias remains under investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Pressure Monitoring\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Pressure Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000706\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究欧姆龙 HEM-7361T 自动示波血压计在区分心房颤动和窦性心律方面的准确性:我们研究了欧姆龙 HEM-7361T 自动示波血压计区分心房颤动和窦性心律的准确性:从中国上海瑞金医院的门诊和住院病人中招募人数大致相同的持续性心房颤动患者和窦性心律患者。使用欧姆龙 HEM-7361T 全自动电子血压计连续测量三次血压,每次间隔 30 秒,以检测心房颤动。使用手持式单导联心电图仪同时记录心电图:在 101 名患者中,该设备准确识别了 100 名(99.0%)患者的心房颤动,只有 1 名患者被错误地归类为非心房颤动。在 104 名有窦性心律的参试者中,该设备正确识别出 99 人(95.2%)为非心房颤动,5 名参试者被错误地归类为心房颤动。该设备的阳性预测值为 95.2%,阴性预测值为 99.0%,总体准确率为 97.1%。在六名被误诊的患者中,一名心房颤动患者的心率为 65 次/分,五名窦性心律患者中有四名患有心律失常(一名患者为房性或室性早搏,一名患者为窦性心动过速,一名患者同时患有两种心律失常):结论:欧姆龙 HEM-7361T 血压计能准确区分心房颤动和窦性心律。结论:欧姆龙 HEM-7361T 血压计能准确区分心房颤动和窦性心律,但该设备在区分心房颤动和其他心律失常方面是否足够准确仍有待研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of the OMRON HEM-7361T blood pressure monitor in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.

Objective: We investigated the accuracy of the OMRON HEM-7361T automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.

Methods: An approximately equal number of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and individuals with sinus rhythm were recruited from outpatients and inpatients of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. BP was measured three times consecutively with a 30-s interval with the OMRON HEM-7361T automatic electronic BP monitor for atrial fibrillation detection. A hand-held single lead electrocardiogram device was used for simultaneous electrocardiogram recordings.

Results: The device accurately identified atrial fibrillation in 100 (99.0%) of the 101 patients, with only 1 patient incorrectly classified as non-atrial fibrillation. The device correctly identified 99 (95.2%) of the 104 participants with sinus rhythm as non-atrial fibrillation, with five participants incorrectly classified as atrial fibrillation. The device had a positive predictive value of 95.2%, negative predictive value of 99.0%, and overall accuracy of 97.1%. Among the six misclassified participants, one with atrial fibrillation had a heart rate of 65 beats/min, and four of the five participants with sinus rhythm had cardiac arrhythmias (atrial or ventricular premature beat in one participants, sinus tachycardia in one participant, and both arrhythmias in one participant).

Conclusion: The OMRON HEM-7361T BP monitor is accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. Whether the device is sufficiently accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and other cardiac arrhythmias remains under investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research. This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
期刊最新文献
Does greater adherence to a healthy dietary pattern correspond to a better body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness in adults with overweight and primary hypertension? Data from the EXERDIET-HTA study. Validation of the TMB-2296-BT blood pressure monitor in adults according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020. Inflammation-based markers, especially the uric acid/albumin ratio, are associated with non-dipper pattern in newly diagnosed treatment-naive hypertensive patients. Validating the accuracy of Omron HEM-7372T1-AZAZ (BP5460) in monitoring blood pressure according to the ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd 1:2020 protocol in the general population. Blood pressure variability at rest and during pressor challenges in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1