ACCORD 试验参与者与美国中老年糖尿病患者的代表性比较。

IF 4.7 2区医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001746

Ryo Ikesu, Yingyan Wu, Scott C Zimmerman, Kosuke Inoue, Peter Buto, Melinda C Power, Catherine A Schaefer, M Maria Glymour, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda

{"title":"ACCORD 试验参与者与美国中老年糖尿病患者的代表性比较。","authors":"Ryo Ikesu, Yingyan Wu, Scott C Zimmerman, Kosuke Inoue, Peter Buto, Melinda C Power, Catherine A Schaefer, M Maria Glymour, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We evaluated whether participants in the landmark Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial represent US adults aged ≥40 with diabetes.Methods: Using the nationally representative 2017-2020 prepandemic National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, we made operational definitions of ACCORD eligibility criteria. We calculated the percentage of individuals aged ≥40 with diabetes and HbA1c ≥ 6.0% or ≥ 7.5% who met operational ACCORD eligibility criteria.Results: Applying survey sampling weights to 715 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants aged ≥40 with diabetes and HbA1c ≥ 6.0% (representing 29,717,406 individuals), 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8%, 18%) met the operational ACCORD eligibility criteria. Restricting to HbA1c ≥ 7.5%, 39% (95% CI = 28%, 51%) of respondents met the operational ACCORD eligibility criteria.Conclusions: ACCORD represented a minority of US middle-aged and older adults with diabetes. Given the differential risk profile between ACCORD participants and the general population with diabetes, extrapolating the trial findings may not be appropriate.","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representativeness of Participants in the ACCORD Trial Compared to Middle-aged and Older Adults Living with Diabetes in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Ikesu, Yingyan Wu, Scott C Zimmerman, Kosuke Inoue, Peter Buto, Melinda C Power, Catherine A Schaefer, M Maria Glymour, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We evaluated whether participants in the landmark Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial represent US adults aged ≥40 with diabetes.Methods: Using the nationally representative 2017-2020 prepandemic National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, we made operational definitions of ACCORD eligibility criteria. We calculated the percentage of individuals aged ≥40 with diabetes and HbA1c ≥ 6.0% or ≥ 7.5% who met operational ACCORD eligibility criteria.Results: Applying survey sampling weights to 715 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants aged ≥40 with diabetes and HbA1c ≥ 6.0% (representing 29,717,406 individuals), 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8%, 18%) met the operational ACCORD eligibility criteria. Restricting to HbA1c ≥ 7.5%, 39% (95% CI = 28%, 51%) of respondents met the operational ACCORD eligibility criteria.Conclusions: ACCORD represented a minority of US middle-aged and older adults with diabetes. Given the differential risk profile between ACCORD participants and the general population with diabetes, extrapolating the trial findings may not be appropriate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196194/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001746\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：我们评估了具有里程碑意义的控制糖尿病心血管风险行动（ACCORD）试验的参与者是否代表了年龄≥40岁的美国成人糖尿病患者：利用具有全国代表性的 2017-2020 年大流行前全国健康与营养调查（NHANES）数据，我们对 ACCORD 的资格标准进行了操作性定义。我们计算了年龄≥40 岁、患有糖尿病且 HbA1c≥6.0% 或≥7.5%、符合 ACCORD 操作资格标准的个体所占的百分比：对 715 名年龄≥40 岁、患有糖尿病且 HbA1c ≥6.0% 的 NHANES 参与者（代表 29,717,406 人）应用调查抽样权重，12%（95% 置信区间 [CI]：8-18%）符合 ACCORD 操作资格标准。如果HbA1c≥7.5%，39%（95% 置信区间：28-51%）的受访者符合 ACCORD 标准：ACCORD 代表了少数美国中老年糖尿病患者。鉴于 ACCORD 参与者与普通糖尿病患者的风险状况不同，推断试验结果可能并不合适。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Representativeness of Participants in the ACCORD Trial Compared to Middle-aged and Older Adults Living with Diabetes in the United States.

Background: We evaluated whether participants in the landmark Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial represent US adults aged ≥40 with diabetes.

Methods: Using the nationally representative 2017-2020 prepandemic National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, we made operational definitions of ACCORD eligibility criteria. We calculated the percentage of individuals aged ≥40 with diabetes and HbA1c ≥ 6.0% or ≥ 7.5% who met operational ACCORD eligibility criteria.

Results: Applying survey sampling weights to 715 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants aged ≥40 with diabetes and HbA1c ≥ 6.0% (representing 29,717,406 individuals), 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8%, 18%) met the operational ACCORD eligibility criteria. Restricting to HbA1c ≥ 7.5%, 39% (95% CI = 28%, 51%) of respondents met the operational ACCORD eligibility criteria.

Conclusions: ACCORD represented a minority of US middle-aged and older adults with diabetes. Given the differential risk profile between ACCORD participants and the general population with diabetes, extrapolating the trial findings may not be appropriate.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

3.70%

发文量

177

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.