弥合孕期二手烟暴露与出生体重关系队列分析中的差异:ECHO计划中的可迁移性框架。

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1289/EHP13961
Andreas M Neophytou, Jenny Aalborg, Sheryl Magzamen, Brianna F Moore, Assiamira Ferrara, Margaret R Karagas, Leonardo Trasande, Dana Dabelea
{"title":"弥合孕期二手烟暴露与出生体重关系队列分析中的差异:ECHO计划中的可迁移性框架。","authors":"Andreas M Neophytou, Jenny Aalborg, Sheryl Magzamen, Brianna F Moore, Assiamira Ferrara, Margaret R Karagas, Leonardo Trasande, Dana Dabelea","doi":"10.1289/EHP13961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimates for the effects of environmental exposures on health outcomes, including secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, often present considerable variability across studies. Knowledge of the reasons behind these differences can aid our understanding of effects in specific populations as well as inform practices of combining data from multiple studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the presence of effect modification by measured sociodemographic characteristics on the effect of SHS exposure during pregnancy on birth weights that may drive differences observed across cohorts. We also aimed to quantify the extent to which differences in the cohort mean effects observed across cohorts in the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) consortium are due to differing distributions of these characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the presence of effect modification and transportability of effect estimates across five ECHO cohorts in a total of 6,771 mother-offspring dyads. We assessed the presence of effect modification via gradient boosting of regression trees based on the H-statistic. We estimated individual cohort effects using linear models and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). We then estimated transported effects from one cohort to each of the remaining cohorts using a robust nonparametric estimation approach relying on TMLE estimators and compared them to the original effect estimates for these cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observed effect estimates varied across the five cohorts, ranging from significantly lower birth weight associated with exposure [<math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>167.3</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>g</mi></mrow></math>; 95% confidence interval (CI): <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>270.4</mn></mrow></math>, <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>64.1</mn></mrow></math>] to higher birth weight with wide CIs, including the null (<math><mrow><mn>42.4</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>g</mi></mrow></math>; 95% CI: <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>15.0</mn></mrow></math>, 99.8). Transported effect estimates only minimally explained differences in the point estimates for two out of the four cohort pairs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings of weak to moderate evidence of effect modification and transportability indicate that unmeasured individual-level and contextual factors and sources of bias may be responsible for differences in the effect estimates observed across ECHO cohorts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13961.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"132 5","pages":"57007"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11108581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Differences in Cohort Analyses of the Relationship between Secondhand Smoke Exposure during Pregnancy and Birth Weight: The Transportability Framework in the ECHO Program.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas M Neophytou, Jenny Aalborg, Sheryl Magzamen, Brianna F Moore, Assiamira Ferrara, Margaret R Karagas, Leonardo Trasande, Dana Dabelea\",\"doi\":\"10.1289/EHP13961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimates for the effects of environmental exposures on health outcomes, including secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, often present considerable variability across studies. Knowledge of the reasons behind these differences can aid our understanding of effects in specific populations as well as inform practices of combining data from multiple studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the presence of effect modification by measured sociodemographic characteristics on the effect of SHS exposure during pregnancy on birth weights that may drive differences observed across cohorts. We also aimed to quantify the extent to which differences in the cohort mean effects observed across cohorts in the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) consortium are due to differing distributions of these characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the presence of effect modification and transportability of effect estimates across five ECHO cohorts in a total of 6,771 mother-offspring dyads. We assessed the presence of effect modification via gradient boosting of regression trees based on the H-statistic. We estimated individual cohort effects using linear models and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). We then estimated transported effects from one cohort to each of the remaining cohorts using a robust nonparametric estimation approach relying on TMLE estimators and compared them to the original effect estimates for these cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observed effect estimates varied across the five cohorts, ranging from significantly lower birth weight associated with exposure [<math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>167.3</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>g</mi></mrow></math>; 95% confidence interval (CI): <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>270.4</mn></mrow></math>, <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>64.1</mn></mrow></math>] to higher birth weight with wide CIs, including the null (<math><mrow><mn>42.4</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>g</mi></mrow></math>; 95% CI: <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>15.0</mn></mrow></math>, 99.8). Transported effect estimates only minimally explained differences in the point estimates for two out of the four cohort pairs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings of weak to moderate evidence of effect modification and transportability indicate that unmeasured individual-level and contextual factors and sources of bias may be responsible for differences in the effect estimates observed across ECHO cohorts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13961.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"132 5\",\"pages\":\"57007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11108581/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13961\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13961","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:环境暴露(包括二手烟(SHS)暴露)对健康结果的影响估计值在不同的研究中往往存在很大差异。了解这些差异背后的原因有助于我们了解对特定人群的影响,并为合并多项研究数据的做法提供参考:本研究旨在评估孕期暴露于 SHS 对出生体重的影响是否会因测量的社会人口学特征而受到影响,这种影响可能会导致在不同队列中观察到的差异。我们还旨在量化在环境对儿童健康结果的影响(ECHO)联合研究中观察到的各队列平均效应差异在多大程度上是由于这些特征的不同分布造成的:我们评估了 ECHO 五个队列共 6771 个母子二人组中是否存在效应修饰以及效应估计值的可迁移性。我们通过基于 H 统计量的梯度提升回归树来评估是否存在效应修饰。我们使用线性模型和目标最大似然估计法(TMLE)估计了单个队列效应。然后,我们使用依赖于 TMLE 估计器的稳健非参数估计方法估计了从一个队列到其余每个队列的迁移效应,并将其与这些队列的原始效应估计值进行了比较:五个队列中观察到的效应估计值各不相同,有的出生体重显著低于暴露值[-167.3g;95% 置信区间 (CI):-270.4, -64.1],有的出生体重较高,但 CI 值较宽,包括零值(42.4g;95% CI:-15.0, 99.8)。在四个队列中,有两个队列的转运效应估计值只能解释点估计值的最小差异:讨论:我们的研究结果表明,效应修正和可迁移性的证据从弱到强,这表明未测量的个体水平和背景因素以及偏差来源可能是导致在 ECHO 队列中观察到的效应估计值差异的原因。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13961。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging Differences in Cohort Analyses of the Relationship between Secondhand Smoke Exposure during Pregnancy and Birth Weight: The Transportability Framework in the ECHO Program.

Background: Estimates for the effects of environmental exposures on health outcomes, including secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, often present considerable variability across studies. Knowledge of the reasons behind these differences can aid our understanding of effects in specific populations as well as inform practices of combining data from multiple studies.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the presence of effect modification by measured sociodemographic characteristics on the effect of SHS exposure during pregnancy on birth weights that may drive differences observed across cohorts. We also aimed to quantify the extent to which differences in the cohort mean effects observed across cohorts in the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) consortium are due to differing distributions of these characteristics.

Methods: We assessed the presence of effect modification and transportability of effect estimates across five ECHO cohorts in a total of 6,771 mother-offspring dyads. We assessed the presence of effect modification via gradient boosting of regression trees based on the H-statistic. We estimated individual cohort effects using linear models and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). We then estimated transported effects from one cohort to each of the remaining cohorts using a robust nonparametric estimation approach relying on TMLE estimators and compared them to the original effect estimates for these cohorts.

Results: Observed effect estimates varied across the five cohorts, ranging from significantly lower birth weight associated with exposure [-167.3g; 95% confidence interval (CI): -270.4, -64.1] to higher birth weight with wide CIs, including the null (42.4g; 95% CI: -15.0, 99.8). Transported effect estimates only minimally explained differences in the point estimates for two out of the four cohort pairs.

Discussion: Our findings of weak to moderate evidence of effect modification and transportability indicate that unmeasured individual-level and contextual factors and sources of bias may be responsible for differences in the effect estimates observed across ECHO cohorts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13961.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Gut Check: Microbiota and Obesity in Mice Exposed to Polystyrene Microspheres. A Prospective Analysis of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Early Pregnancy to Delivery in the Atlanta African American Maternal-Child Cohort. Association between Diet-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mortality among Japanese Adults: The Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. Madagascar's Plague: One Health Research Aims to Slow Its Spread. Organophosphorus Flame Retardants and Metabolic Disruption: An in Silico, in Vitro, and in Vivo Study Focusing on Adiponectin Receptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1