加拿大公众对初级保健的体验和看法:横断面调查的结果。

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Canadian Medical Association journal Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1503/cmaj.231372
Tara Kiran, Maryam Daneshvarfard, Ri Wang, Alexander Beyer, Jasmin Kay, Mylaine Breton, Danielle Brown-Shreves, Amanda Condon, Michael E Green, Lindsay Hedden, Alan Katz, Maggie Keresteci, Neb Kovacina, M Ruth Lavergne, Aisha Lofters, Danielle Martin, Goldis Mitra, Sarah Newbery, Katherine Stringer, Peter MacLeod, Clifton van der Linden
{"title":"加拿大公众对初级保健的体验和看法:横断面调查的结果。","authors":"Tara Kiran, Maryam Daneshvarfard, Ri Wang, Alexander Beyer, Jasmin Kay, Mylaine Breton, Danielle Brown-Shreves, Amanda Condon, Michael E Green, Lindsay Hedden, Alan Katz, Maggie Keresteci, Neb Kovacina, M Ruth Lavergne, Aisha Lofters, Danielle Martin, Goldis Mitra, Sarah Newbery, Katherine Stringer, Peter MacLeod, Clifton van der Linden","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.231372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Through medicare, residents in Canada are entitled to medically necessary physician services without paying out of pocket, but still many people struggle to access primary care. We conducted a survey to explore people's experience with and priorities for primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online, bilingual survey of adults in Canada in fall 2022. We distributed an anonymous link through diverse channels and a closed link to 122 053 people via a national public opinion firm. We weighted completed responses to mirror Canada's population and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 9279 completed surveys (5.9% response rate via closed link). More than one-fifth of respondents (21.8%) reported having no primary care clinician, and among those who did, 34.5% reported getting a same or next-day appointment for urgent issues. Of respondents, 89.4% expressed comfort seeing another team member if their doctor recommended it, but only 35.9%, 9.5%, and 12.4% reported that their practice had a nurse, social worker, or pharmacist, respectively. The primary care attribute that mattered most was having a clinician who \"knows me as a person and considers all the factors that affect my health.\" After we adjusted for respondent characteristics, people in Quebec, the Atlantic region, and British Columbia had lower odds of reporting a primary care clinician than people in Ontario (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 0.33, and 0.39, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). We also observed large provincial variations in timely access, interprofessional care, and walk-in clinic use.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>More than 1 in 5 respondents did not have access to primary care, with large variation by province. Reforms should strive to expand access to relationship-based, longitudinal care in a team setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9609,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Medical Association journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11104576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public experiences and perspectives of primary care in Canada: results from a cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Tara Kiran, Maryam Daneshvarfard, Ri Wang, Alexander Beyer, Jasmin Kay, Mylaine Breton, Danielle Brown-Shreves, Amanda Condon, Michael E Green, Lindsay Hedden, Alan Katz, Maggie Keresteci, Neb Kovacina, M Ruth Lavergne, Aisha Lofters, Danielle Martin, Goldis Mitra, Sarah Newbery, Katherine Stringer, Peter MacLeod, Clifton van der Linden\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/cmaj.231372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Through medicare, residents in Canada are entitled to medically necessary physician services without paying out of pocket, but still many people struggle to access primary care. We conducted a survey to explore people's experience with and priorities for primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online, bilingual survey of adults in Canada in fall 2022. We distributed an anonymous link through diverse channels and a closed link to 122 053 people via a national public opinion firm. We weighted completed responses to mirror Canada's population and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 9279 completed surveys (5.9% response rate via closed link). More than one-fifth of respondents (21.8%) reported having no primary care clinician, and among those who did, 34.5% reported getting a same or next-day appointment for urgent issues. Of respondents, 89.4% expressed comfort seeing another team member if their doctor recommended it, but only 35.9%, 9.5%, and 12.4% reported that their practice had a nurse, social worker, or pharmacist, respectively. The primary care attribute that mattered most was having a clinician who \\\"knows me as a person and considers all the factors that affect my health.\\\" After we adjusted for respondent characteristics, people in Quebec, the Atlantic region, and British Columbia had lower odds of reporting a primary care clinician than people in Ontario (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 0.33, and 0.39, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). We also observed large provincial variations in timely access, interprofessional care, and walk-in clinic use.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>More than 1 in 5 respondents did not have access to primary care, with large variation by province. Reforms should strive to expand access to relationship-based, longitudinal care in a team setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Medical Association journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11104576/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Medical Association journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.231372\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Medical Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.231372","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过医疗保险,加拿大居民有权获得医疗必需的医生服务,而无需自掏腰包,但仍有许多人难以获得初级医疗服务。我们进行了一项调查,以了解人们对初级医疗服务的体验和优先考虑:我们于 2022 年秋季对加拿大成年人进行了一次在线双语调查。我们通过各种渠道发布了匿名链接,并通过一家全国性民意调查公司向122053人发布了封闭链接。我们对已完成的回复进行了加权,以反映加拿大的人口情况,并使用回归模型对社会人口特征进行了调整:我们分析了 9279 份已完成的调查问卷(通过封闭链接的回复率为 5.9%)。超过五分之一的受访者(21.8%)表示没有初级保健医生,而在有初级保健医生的受访者中,34.5%的受访者表示紧急问题可以当天或隔天预约。在受访者中,89.4% 的人表示,如果医生推荐,他们很乐意去看其他团队成员,但分别只有 35.9%、9.5% 和 12.4% 的人表示他们的诊所有护士、社工或药剂师。最重要的初级保健属性是临床医生 "了解我这个人并考虑影响我健康的所有因素"。在对受访者的特征进行调整后,魁北克省、大西洋地区和不列颠哥伦比亚省的受访者报告拥有初级保健医生的几率低于安大略省的受访者(调整后的几率分别为 0.30、0.33 和 0.39;P < 0.001)。我们还观察到,各省在及时就医、跨专业护理和无预约门诊的使用方面存在很大差异:超过五分之一的受访者无法获得初级医疗服务,各省之间差异很大。改革应努力扩大在团队环境中获得以关系为基础的纵向医疗服务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public experiences and perspectives of primary care in Canada: results from a cross-sectional survey.

Background: Through medicare, residents in Canada are entitled to medically necessary physician services without paying out of pocket, but still many people struggle to access primary care. We conducted a survey to explore people's experience with and priorities for primary care.

Methods: We conducted an online, bilingual survey of adults in Canada in fall 2022. We distributed an anonymous link through diverse channels and a closed link to 122 053 people via a national public opinion firm. We weighted completed responses to mirror Canada's population and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics using regression models.

Results: We analyzed 9279 completed surveys (5.9% response rate via closed link). More than one-fifth of respondents (21.8%) reported having no primary care clinician, and among those who did, 34.5% reported getting a same or next-day appointment for urgent issues. Of respondents, 89.4% expressed comfort seeing another team member if their doctor recommended it, but only 35.9%, 9.5%, and 12.4% reported that their practice had a nurse, social worker, or pharmacist, respectively. The primary care attribute that mattered most was having a clinician who "knows me as a person and considers all the factors that affect my health." After we adjusted for respondent characteristics, people in Quebec, the Atlantic region, and British Columbia had lower odds of reporting a primary care clinician than people in Ontario (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 0.33, and 0.39, respectively; p < 0.001). We also observed large provincial variations in timely access, interprofessional care, and walk-in clinic use.

Interpretation: More than 1 in 5 respondents did not have access to primary care, with large variation by province. Reforms should strive to expand access to relationship-based, longitudinal care in a team setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Medical Association journal
Canadian Medical Association journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) is a peer-reviewed general medical journal renowned for publishing original research, commentaries, analyses, reviews, clinical practice updates, and editorials. Led by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Kirsten Patrick, it has a significant impact on healthcare in Canada and globally, with a 2022 impact factor of 17.4. Its mission is to promote knowledge vital for the health of Canadians and the global community, guided by values of service, evidence, and integrity. The journal's vision emphasizes the importance of the best evidence, practice, and health outcomes. CMAJ covers a broad range of topics, focusing on contributing to the evidence base, influencing clinical practice, and raising awareness of pressing health issues among policymakers and the public. Since 2020, with the appointment of a Lead of Patient Involvement, CMAJ is committed to integrating patients into its governance and operations, encouraging their content submissions.
期刊最新文献
A moment of mourning suspended in air. Closing gaps in care and knowledge for adults with complex genetic conditions. Diabète de type 2 à début précoce. Emergency department use before cancer diagnosis in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. Granulome annulaire généralisé.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1