4DryField 与 hyalobarrier 凝胶在预防宫腔内粘连复发方面的对比--一项试点研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1080/13645706.2024.2351829
Zdenka Lisa, Adela Richtarova, Kristyna Hlinecka, Barbora Boudova, David Kuzel, Michael Fanta, Michal Mara
{"title":"4DryField 与 hyalobarrier 凝胶在预防宫腔内粘连复发方面的对比--一项试点研究。","authors":"Zdenka Lisa, Adela Richtarova, Kristyna Hlinecka, Barbora Boudova, David Kuzel, Michael Fanta, Michal Mara","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2351829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This was a single-center pilot study that sought to describe an innovative use of 4DryField® PH (premix) for preventing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with Asherman's syndrome (AS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients with AS were enrolled and 20 were randomized (1:1 ratio) to intrauterine application of 4DryField® PH (<i>n</i> = 10) or Hyalobarrier<sup>®</sup> gel (<i>n</i> = 10) in a single-blind manner. We evaluated IUAs (American Fertility Society [AFS] score) during initial hysteroscopy and second-look hysteroscopy one month later. Patients completed a follow-up symptoms questionnaire three and reproductive outcomes questionnaire six months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as severity of IUAs, were comparable in both groups. The mean initial AFS score was 9 and 8.5 in the 4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH and Hyalobarrier<sup>®</sup> gel groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = .476). There were no between-group differences in AFS progress (5.9 vs. 5.6, <i>p</i> = .675), need for secondary adhesiolysis (7 vs. 7 patients, <i>p</i> = 1), and the follow-up outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH could be a promising antiadhesive agent for preventing the recurrence of IUAs, showing similar effectiveness and safety to Hyalobarrier<sup>®</sup> gel. Our findings warrant prospective validation in a larger clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry number: </strong>ISRCTN15630617.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4DryField vs. hyalobarrier gel for preventing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions - a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Zdenka Lisa, Adela Richtarova, Kristyna Hlinecka, Barbora Boudova, David Kuzel, Michael Fanta, Michal Mara\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645706.2024.2351829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This was a single-center pilot study that sought to describe an innovative use of 4DryField® PH (premix) for preventing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with Asherman's syndrome (AS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients with AS were enrolled and 20 were randomized (1:1 ratio) to intrauterine application of 4DryField® PH (<i>n</i> = 10) or Hyalobarrier<sup>®</sup> gel (<i>n</i> = 10) in a single-blind manner. We evaluated IUAs (American Fertility Society [AFS] score) during initial hysteroscopy and second-look hysteroscopy one month later. Patients completed a follow-up symptoms questionnaire three and reproductive outcomes questionnaire six months later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as severity of IUAs, were comparable in both groups. The mean initial AFS score was 9 and 8.5 in the 4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH and Hyalobarrier<sup>®</sup> gel groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = .476). There were no between-group differences in AFS progress (5.9 vs. 5.6, <i>p</i> = .675), need for secondary adhesiolysis (7 vs. 7 patients, <i>p</i> = 1), and the follow-up outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>4DryField<sup>®</sup> PH could be a promising antiadhesive agent for preventing the recurrence of IUAs, showing similar effectiveness and safety to Hyalobarrier<sup>®</sup> gel. Our findings warrant prospective validation in a larger clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry number: </strong>ISRCTN15630617.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2351829\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2351829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:这是一项单中心试点研究,旨在描述4DryField® PH(预混剂)在阿舍曼氏综合征(AS)患者宫腔镜粘连溶解术后预防宫腔内粘连(IUAs)复发的创新应用:23名AS患者被纳入研究,20名患者被随机(1:1的比例)在宫腔内应用4DryField® PH(n = 10)或Hyalobarrier®凝胶(n = 10)。我们在初次宫腔镜检查和一个月后的第二次宫腔镜检查中对 IUAs(美国生育协会 [AFS] 评分)进行了评估。患者在三个月后填写了随访症状问卷,六个月后填写了生殖结果问卷:结果:两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征以及 IUAs 的严重程度相当。4DryField® PH 组和 Hyalobarrier® 凝胶组的初始 AFS 平均得分分别为 9 分和 8.5 分(p = .476)。在 AFS 进展(5.9 vs. 5.6,p = .675)、二次粘连溶解需求(7 vs. 7 名患者,p = 1)和随访结果方面没有组间差异:4DryField®PH可能是一种很有前景的预防IUA复发的抗粘连剂,其有效性和安全性与Hyalobarrier®凝胶相似。临床试验登记号:ISRCTN15630617。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4DryField vs. hyalobarrier gel for preventing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions - a pilot study.

Introduction: This was a single-center pilot study that sought to describe an innovative use of 4DryField® PH (premix) for preventing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with Asherman's syndrome (AS).

Material and methods: Twenty-three patients with AS were enrolled and 20 were randomized (1:1 ratio) to intrauterine application of 4DryField® PH (n = 10) or Hyalobarrier® gel (n = 10) in a single-blind manner. We evaluated IUAs (American Fertility Society [AFS] score) during initial hysteroscopy and second-look hysteroscopy one month later. Patients completed a follow-up symptoms questionnaire three and reproductive outcomes questionnaire six months later.

Results: The demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as severity of IUAs, were comparable in both groups. The mean initial AFS score was 9 and 8.5 in the 4DryField® PH and Hyalobarrier® gel groups, respectively (p = .476). There were no between-group differences in AFS progress (5.9 vs. 5.6, p = .675), need for secondary adhesiolysis (7 vs. 7 patients, p = 1), and the follow-up outcomes.

Conclusion: 4DryField® PH could be a promising antiadhesive agent for preventing the recurrence of IUAs, showing similar effectiveness and safety to Hyalobarrier® gel. Our findings warrant prospective validation in a larger clinical trial.

Clinical trial registry number: ISRCTN15630617.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic cardiac mucosal ligation: a novel minimally invasive procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The effect of peritoneal flap fixation with curling technique on postoperative lymphocele formation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Right mini-thoracotomy for concomitant aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass graft. Three-dimensional semiquantitative evaluation of reactive emphysema in magnesium implant models. Clash of the Titans: the first multi-center retrospective comparative study between da Vinci and Hugo RAS surgical systems for the treatment of deep endometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1