辅助技术对老年性视力丧失(ARVL)老年人风险体验的影响。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2353860
Colleen McGrath, Yvonne Galos, Emmanuel Bassey, Bernice Chung
{"title":"辅助技术对老年性视力丧失(ARVL)老年人风险体验的影响。","authors":"Colleen McGrath, Yvonne Galos, Emmanuel Bassey, Bernice Chung","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2353860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Living with risk is a salient part of everyday living and although risk affects everyone, older adults are often regarded as a high-risk group, particularly older adults who are aging with a disability, such as vision loss. A prominent focus within low vision rehabilitation is the provision, and training, of older adults in the use of low vision assistive devices as a strategy to manage risks in both the home and community environment. This study aimed to unpack the influence of assistive technologies on experiences of risk among eleven older adults (aged 65+) with age-related vision loss.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This critical ethnographic study used home tours, the go-along method, and a semi-structured in-depth interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified five prevailing themes including: 1) Moving away from the individualization of risk; 2) The cost of assistive technologies as a risk contributor; 3) Practicing 'responsible living'; Technology as an adaptive strategy to risk taking; 4) Resisting the label of 'at risk'; The influence of technology on self-identity; and 5) Technology as a substitution versus supplement for social connectedness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings highlight the importance of moving beyond a technico-scientific perspective of risk, in which risk is framed as an objective phenomenon located in older adults' bodies, and instead framing risk within a broader sociocultural perspective which moves our attention to those contextual or environmental factors that shape experiences of risk for older adults with vision loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"118-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of assistive technologies on experiences of risk among older adults with age-related vision loss (ARVL).\",\"authors\":\"Colleen McGrath, Yvonne Galos, Emmanuel Bassey, Bernice Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2024.2353860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Living with risk is a salient part of everyday living and although risk affects everyone, older adults are often regarded as a high-risk group, particularly older adults who are aging with a disability, such as vision loss. A prominent focus within low vision rehabilitation is the provision, and training, of older adults in the use of low vision assistive devices as a strategy to manage risks in both the home and community environment. This study aimed to unpack the influence of assistive technologies on experiences of risk among eleven older adults (aged 65+) with age-related vision loss.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This critical ethnographic study used home tours, the go-along method, and a semi-structured in-depth interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified five prevailing themes including: 1) Moving away from the individualization of risk; 2) The cost of assistive technologies as a risk contributor; 3) Practicing 'responsible living'; Technology as an adaptive strategy to risk taking; 4) Resisting the label of 'at risk'; The influence of technology on self-identity; and 5) Technology as a substitution versus supplement for social connectedness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings highlight the importance of moving beyond a technico-scientific perspective of risk, in which risk is framed as an objective phenomenon located in older adults' bodies, and instead framing risk within a broader sociocultural perspective which moves our attention to those contextual or environmental factors that shape experiences of risk for older adults with vision loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"118-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2353860\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2353860","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与风险共存是日常生活的一个重要组成部分,尽管风险影响着每一个人,但老年人通常被视为高风险群体,尤其是患有视力丧失等残疾的老年人。低视力康复的一个突出重点是为老年人提供使用低视力辅助设备的培训,以此作为在家庭和社区环境中控制风险的一种策略。本研究旨在了解辅助技术对 11 名患有老年性视力损失的老年人(65 岁以上)的风险体验的影响:这项批判性人种学研究采用了家庭参观、同行法和半结构式深度访谈等方法:研究确定了五大主题,包括1) 摆脱风险的个人化;2) 辅助技术的成本是造成风险的一个因素;3) 实践 "负责任的生活";技术是承担风险的一种适应策略;4) 抵制 "有风险 "的标签;技术对自我认同的影响;以及 5) 技术是社会联系的替代品还是补充品:研究结果强调了超越从技术科学角度看待风险的重要性,在技术科学角度,风险被视为老年人身体中的一种客观现象,而从更广泛的社会文化角度来看待风险,将我们的注意力转移到那些影响视力丧失老年人风险体验的背景或环境因素上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of assistive technologies on experiences of risk among older adults with age-related vision loss (ARVL).

Purpose: Living with risk is a salient part of everyday living and although risk affects everyone, older adults are often regarded as a high-risk group, particularly older adults who are aging with a disability, such as vision loss. A prominent focus within low vision rehabilitation is the provision, and training, of older adults in the use of low vision assistive devices as a strategy to manage risks in both the home and community environment. This study aimed to unpack the influence of assistive technologies on experiences of risk among eleven older adults (aged 65+) with age-related vision loss.

Materials and methods: This critical ethnographic study used home tours, the go-along method, and a semi-structured in-depth interview.

Results: The study identified five prevailing themes including: 1) Moving away from the individualization of risk; 2) The cost of assistive technologies as a risk contributor; 3) Practicing 'responsible living'; Technology as an adaptive strategy to risk taking; 4) Resisting the label of 'at risk'; The influence of technology on self-identity; and 5) Technology as a substitution versus supplement for social connectedness.

Conclusions: The study findings highlight the importance of moving beyond a technico-scientific perspective of risk, in which risk is framed as an objective phenomenon located in older adults' bodies, and instead framing risk within a broader sociocultural perspective which moves our attention to those contextual or environmental factors that shape experiences of risk for older adults with vision loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Families' experiences and perspectives on the early use of powered mobility in children with spinal muscular atrophy type I in the natural context. Machine learning classification method for wheelchair detection using bag-of-visual-words technique. Survey on demand for smart home technology as assistive technology for people with physical disabilities in Korea. Assistive technology at work: a metasynthesis of the perspectives of people with spinal cord injury/damage. Raising wheelchair quality in India using international testing standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1