预测治疗结果的客户偏好、治疗活动和偏好-活动匹配。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2024.2353358
Celia Faye Jacobsen, Karen-Inge Karstoft, Fredrik Falkenström, Jan Nielsen, Susanne Lunn, Stig Poulsen
{"title":"预测治疗结果的客户偏好、治疗活动和偏好-活动匹配。","authors":"Celia Faye Jacobsen, Karen-Inge Karstoft, Fredrik Falkenström, Jan Nielsen, Susanne Lunn, Stig Poulsen","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2353358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether distinct types of psychotherapy activities, the client's preference towards these activities prior to therapy, and the degree of match between client preferences and therapy activities, served as predictors of treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 621 clients (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 42 years, 71.7% female) received individual psychotherapy by 54 psychologists. Associations between activity preferences, therapy activities, and preference-activity match as predictors, and symptom change and treatment dropout as outcomes were analyzed using multilevel longitudinal and logistic modelling and polynomial regression models with response surface analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No type of therapy activity or activity preference significantly predicted symptom change in therapy, while higher levels of <i>inward orientation</i> therapy activities predicted an increased risk of dropout. Moreover, matching and higher levels of <i>inward orientation</i> and a<i>ffect expression</i> activities predicted an increased risk of dropout, and matching and higher levels of <i>outward orientation</i> activities predicted a decreased risk of dropout. Finally, a preference-activity mismatch in <i>affect suppression</i> predicted an increased risk of dropout from therapy, both at higher and lower levels of <i>affect suppression</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distinct types of therapy activity preferences may, especially when (mis)matched with similar levels of the same therapy activities, differentially predict particular dropout from therapy.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05630560.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Client preferences, therapy activities and preference-activity match as predictors of therapy outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Celia Faye Jacobsen, Karen-Inge Karstoft, Fredrik Falkenström, Jan Nielsen, Susanne Lunn, Stig Poulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2024.2353358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether distinct types of psychotherapy activities, the client's preference towards these activities prior to therapy, and the degree of match between client preferences and therapy activities, served as predictors of treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 621 clients (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 42 years, 71.7% female) received individual psychotherapy by 54 psychologists. Associations between activity preferences, therapy activities, and preference-activity match as predictors, and symptom change and treatment dropout as outcomes were analyzed using multilevel longitudinal and logistic modelling and polynomial regression models with response surface analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No type of therapy activity or activity preference significantly predicted symptom change in therapy, while higher levels of <i>inward orientation</i> therapy activities predicted an increased risk of dropout. Moreover, matching and higher levels of <i>inward orientation</i> and a<i>ffect expression</i> activities predicted an increased risk of dropout, and matching and higher levels of <i>outward orientation</i> activities predicted a decreased risk of dropout. Finally, a preference-activity mismatch in <i>affect suppression</i> predicted an increased risk of dropout from therapy, both at higher and lower levels of <i>affect suppression</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distinct types of therapy activity preferences may, especially when (mis)matched with similar levels of the same therapy activities, differentially predict particular dropout from therapy.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05630560.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2353358\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2353358","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究调查了不同类型的心理治疗活动、求助者在治疗前对这些活动的偏好以及求助者偏好与治疗活动之间的匹配程度是否可以预测治疗结果:共有 621 名客户(年龄 = 42 岁,71.7% 为女性)接受了 54 名心理学家的个人心理治疗。采用多层次纵向逻辑模型和多项式回归模型,并结合响应面分析,分析了作为预测因素的活动偏好、治疗活动和偏好-活动匹配与作为结果的症状变化和治疗退出之间的关联:任何治疗活动类型或活动偏好都不能显著预测治疗中的症状变化,而内向型治疗活动水平越高,预测的辍学风险越大。此外,与内向型治疗活动和情感表达活动相匹配且水平较高的治疗活动会增加辍学风险,而与外向型治疗活动相匹配且水平较高的治疗活动会降低辍学风险。最后,情感抑制方面的偏好-活动不匹配预示着在情感抑制水平较高和较低的情况下,放弃治疗的风险都会增加:结论:不同类型的治疗活动偏好,尤其是在与相同治疗活动的相似水平(错误)匹配的情况下,可能会对特定的治疗辍学率产生不同的预测作用:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT05630560.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Client preferences, therapy activities and preference-activity match as predictors of therapy outcome.

Objective: This study investigated whether distinct types of psychotherapy activities, the client's preference towards these activities prior to therapy, and the degree of match between client preferences and therapy activities, served as predictors of treatment outcomes.

Methods: A total of 621 clients (Mage = 42 years, 71.7% female) received individual psychotherapy by 54 psychologists. Associations between activity preferences, therapy activities, and preference-activity match as predictors, and symptom change and treatment dropout as outcomes were analyzed using multilevel longitudinal and logistic modelling and polynomial regression models with response surface analysis.

Results: No type of therapy activity or activity preference significantly predicted symptom change in therapy, while higher levels of inward orientation therapy activities predicted an increased risk of dropout. Moreover, matching and higher levels of inward orientation and affect expression activities predicted an increased risk of dropout, and matching and higher levels of outward orientation activities predicted a decreased risk of dropout. Finally, a preference-activity mismatch in affect suppression predicted an increased risk of dropout from therapy, both at higher and lower levels of affect suppression.

Conclusion: Distinct types of therapy activity preferences may, especially when (mis)matched with similar levels of the same therapy activities, differentially predict particular dropout from therapy.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05630560.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
期刊最新文献
Adolescent, caregivers, and therapists' experiences of youth and family suicide intervention: A qualitative study. Therapist responsiveness in psychotherapy: Introduction to the special issue. Therapists' experiences of negative effects in intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy: A qualitative interview study. Do treatments for mental disorders affect relationship satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Client-counselor behavioral and inter-brain synchronization among dismissing and secure clients and its association with alliance quality and outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1