麻醉气体与环境:是时候重新思考了吗?

{"title":"麻醉气体与环境:是时候重新思考了吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>General anaesthesia<span> is in common use for patients undergoing surgical procedures, with the option of both inhalational and intravenous anaesthetic techniques. </span></span>Anaesthetic gases are often excluded from discussions on sustainable healthcare delivery, despite being a significant contributor to the overall environmental impact of healthcare services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature review was carried out on previously published papers on the impact anaesthetic gases have on our environment and at ways to reduce their impact in current anaesthetic practice. The aim was to write a narrative review detailing the areas of concern as well as the current clinical situation in the European setting.</p></div><div><h3>Summary/conclusions</h3><p>The two classes of inhaled anaesthetic<span><span><span> agent most frequently used are nitrous oxide<span> and volatile agents (most commonly </span></span>sevoflurane, </span>isoflurane and desflurane). Both are recognised greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.</span></p><p><span><span><span>Minor modifications in the use of anaesthetic gases can have a significant environmental impact. These modifications include avoiding nitrous oxide whenever possible, avoiding </span>desflurane<span> (and using sevoflurane<span> instead), using low flow anaesthesia during maintenance, swapping volatile-based anaesthesia for a </span></span></span>TIVA technique when clinically appropriate and considering the use of central neuraxial or </span>regional anaesthesia in place of general anaesthesia when possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 4","pages":"Pages 200-202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaesthetic gases and the environment: Is it time for a rethink?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2024.04.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>General anaesthesia<span> is in common use for patients undergoing surgical procedures, with the option of both inhalational and intravenous anaesthetic techniques. </span></span>Anaesthetic gases are often excluded from discussions on sustainable healthcare delivery, despite being a significant contributor to the overall environmental impact of healthcare services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature review was carried out on previously published papers on the impact anaesthetic gases have on our environment and at ways to reduce their impact in current anaesthetic practice. The aim was to write a narrative review detailing the areas of concern as well as the current clinical situation in the European setting.</p></div><div><h3>Summary/conclusions</h3><p>The two classes of inhaled anaesthetic<span><span><span> agent most frequently used are nitrous oxide<span> and volatile agents (most commonly </span></span>sevoflurane, </span>isoflurane and desflurane). Both are recognised greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.</span></p><p><span><span><span>Minor modifications in the use of anaesthetic gases can have a significant environmental impact. These modifications include avoiding nitrous oxide whenever possible, avoiding </span>desflurane<span> (and using sevoflurane<span> instead), using low flow anaesthesia during maintenance, swapping volatile-based anaesthesia for a </span></span></span>TIVA technique when clinically appropriate and considering the use of central neuraxial or </span>regional anaesthesia in place of general anaesthesia when possible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 200-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000465\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受外科手术的患者通常会进行全身麻醉,并可选择吸入和静脉麻醉技术。尽管麻醉气体对医疗保健服务的整体环境影响很大,但在有关可持续医疗保健服务的讨论中,麻醉气体往往被排除在外:方法:我们对以前发表的关于麻醉气体对环境的影响以及在当前麻醉实践中减少其影响的方法的论文进行了文献综述。目的是撰写一篇叙事性综述,详细说明关注的领域以及欧洲目前的临床情况:最常用的两类吸入麻醉剂是氧化亚氮和挥发性麻醉剂(最常见的是七氟醚、异氟醚和地氟醚)。这两种物质都是公认的温室气体,会导致气候变化。在使用麻醉气体时稍作调整,就能对环境产生重大影响。这些调整包括尽可能避免使用氧化亚氮、避免使用地氟醚(而使用七氟醚)、在维持过程中使用低流量麻醉、在临床合适的情况下将挥发性麻醉改为 TIVA 技术,以及在可能的情况下考虑使用中枢神经或区域麻醉来代替全身麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anaesthetic gases and the environment: Is it time for a rethink?

Background

General anaesthesia is in common use for patients undergoing surgical procedures, with the option of both inhalational and intravenous anaesthetic techniques. Anaesthetic gases are often excluded from discussions on sustainable healthcare delivery, despite being a significant contributor to the overall environmental impact of healthcare services.

Methods

A literature review was carried out on previously published papers on the impact anaesthetic gases have on our environment and at ways to reduce their impact in current anaesthetic practice. The aim was to write a narrative review detailing the areas of concern as well as the current clinical situation in the European setting.

Summary/conclusions

The two classes of inhaled anaesthetic agent most frequently used are nitrous oxide and volatile agents (most commonly sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane). Both are recognised greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.

Minor modifications in the use of anaesthetic gases can have a significant environmental impact. These modifications include avoiding nitrous oxide whenever possible, avoiding desflurane (and using sevoflurane instead), using low flow anaesthesia during maintenance, swapping volatile-based anaesthesia for a TIVA technique when clinically appropriate and considering the use of central neuraxial or regional anaesthesia in place of general anaesthesia when possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
期刊最新文献
Enhancements in artificial intelligence for medical examinations: A leap from ChatGPT 3.5 to ChatGPT 4.0 in the FRCS trauma & orthopaedics examination. A boost to concentration or a distracting noise? A systematic review of surgeon and anaesthetist perspectives of the benefit of intra-operative music. List of editors Surgeon ability to predict physical activity and sedentary time: Comparison of self-reported and measured activity Sensitivity and specificity of surgeons' intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1