适应新常态:了解大流行病背景下公共交通的使用情况和社会疏远的支付意愿

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Urban Mobility Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100079
Manuel Filgueiras , Marco Amorim , António Lobo , António Couto , Mira Kern , Sara Ferreira
{"title":"适应新常态:了解大流行病背景下公共交通的使用情况和社会疏远的支付意愿","authors":"Manuel Filgueiras ,&nbsp;Marco Amorim ,&nbsp;António Lobo ,&nbsp;António Couto ,&nbsp;Mira Kern ,&nbsp;Sara Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has been a worldwide disruptive event that impacted, to a greater or lesser extent, all countries and economic activities. In the transport sector, stakeholders are still dealing with and learning from its consequences, as many users have changed their preferences towards private and less sustainable modes. In this paper, a mixed logit modelling approach was applied to a vast database from a stated preference survey conducted in Germany to assess the influence of COVID-19 on mobility preferences in three different stages of the pandemic period: lockdown (high-risk of spread, May 2020), post-lockdown (medium risk of spread, June 2020), and a period where the number of infected cases was lower (small risk of spread, October 2020). Several variables were included in the analysis, such as sociodemographic characteristics, mobility habits and preferences regarding future mobility solutions. Three models were developed, one for each pandemic stage. A comprehensive and reflective analysis of the models’ results, aligned with other studies’ findings, shows that the utility of public transport (PuT) and bicycles, based on individuals’ sociodemographic characteristics and choice attributes, compared to cars was affected by the pandemic state. Regarding the influence of crowding inside PuT during the different periods, it was concluded that users are more willing to pay an extra for their monthly passes to have available seats in PuT in the latter stage of the pandemic. The availability of dedicated bike lanes and a shower at the destination were considered attractive factors for cycling during the lockdown phase. Regarding the private car use, the cost of parking is the only attribute that demonstrates a causal effect on the preference for using this mode. This attribute holds a greater relevance during the post-lockdown and “new normal” periods. The results of this study can be helpful to guide policymakers on the definition of actions to counteract the increasing preference for private transport in the future and during disruptions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000098/pdfft?md5=0e71111184dfe8a53f92ca4c93db1621&pid=1-s2.0-S2667091724000098-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting to the new normal: Understanding public transport use and willingness-to-pay for social distancing during a pandemic context\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Filgueiras ,&nbsp;Marco Amorim ,&nbsp;António Lobo ,&nbsp;António Couto ,&nbsp;Mira Kern ,&nbsp;Sara Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has been a worldwide disruptive event that impacted, to a greater or lesser extent, all countries and economic activities. In the transport sector, stakeholders are still dealing with and learning from its consequences, as many users have changed their preferences towards private and less sustainable modes. In this paper, a mixed logit modelling approach was applied to a vast database from a stated preference survey conducted in Germany to assess the influence of COVID-19 on mobility preferences in three different stages of the pandemic period: lockdown (high-risk of spread, May 2020), post-lockdown (medium risk of spread, June 2020), and a period where the number of infected cases was lower (small risk of spread, October 2020). Several variables were included in the analysis, such as sociodemographic characteristics, mobility habits and preferences regarding future mobility solutions. Three models were developed, one for each pandemic stage. A comprehensive and reflective analysis of the models’ results, aligned with other studies’ findings, shows that the utility of public transport (PuT) and bicycles, based on individuals’ sociodemographic characteristics and choice attributes, compared to cars was affected by the pandemic state. Regarding the influence of crowding inside PuT during the different periods, it was concluded that users are more willing to pay an extra for their monthly passes to have available seats in PuT in the latter stage of the pandemic. The availability of dedicated bike lanes and a shower at the destination were considered attractive factors for cycling during the lockdown phase. Regarding the private car use, the cost of parking is the only attribute that demonstrates a causal effect on the preference for using this mode. This attribute holds a greater relevance during the post-lockdown and “new normal” periods. The results of this study can be helpful to guide policymakers on the definition of actions to counteract the increasing preference for private transport in the future and during disruptions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Mobility\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000098/pdfft?md5=0e71111184dfe8a53f92ca4c93db1621&pid=1-s2.0-S2667091724000098-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行病是一个全球性的破坏性事件,或多或少地影响了所有国家和 经济活动。在交通领域,利益相关者仍在应对并从其后果中吸取教训,因为许多用户已经改变了对私人和可持续性较差的交通方式的偏好。本文将混合 Logit 建模方法应用于在德国进行的陈述偏好调查的庞大数据库中,以评估 COVID-19 在大流行期间的三个不同阶段对流动偏好的影响:封锁期(传播风险高,2020 年 5 月)、封锁期后(传播风险中等,2020 年 6 月)以及感染病例数量较少的时期(传播风险小,2020 年 10 月)。分析中包含多个变量,如社会人口特征、移动习惯和对未来移动解决方案的偏好。共开发了三个模型,每个大流行阶段一个。对模型结果进行的全面反思分析与其他研究结果一致,结果表明,根据个人的社会人口特征和选择属性,与汽车相比,公共交通(PuT)和自行车的效用受到大流行状态的影响。关于不同时期公共交通拥挤程度的影响,结论是在疫情后期,用户更愿意为月票支付额外费用,以获得公共交通的空座位。在封锁阶段,自行车专用道的可用性和目的地的淋浴设施被认为是骑自行车的吸引因素。关于私家车的使用,停车费用是唯一一个对私家车使用偏好有因果影响的因素。在封锁后和 "新常态 "时期,这一因素具有更大的相关性。这项研究的结果有助于指导政策制定者确定行动,以应对未来和干扰期间人们对私人交通日益增长的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adapting to the new normal: Understanding public transport use and willingness-to-pay for social distancing during a pandemic context

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a worldwide disruptive event that impacted, to a greater or lesser extent, all countries and economic activities. In the transport sector, stakeholders are still dealing with and learning from its consequences, as many users have changed their preferences towards private and less sustainable modes. In this paper, a mixed logit modelling approach was applied to a vast database from a stated preference survey conducted in Germany to assess the influence of COVID-19 on mobility preferences in three different stages of the pandemic period: lockdown (high-risk of spread, May 2020), post-lockdown (medium risk of spread, June 2020), and a period where the number of infected cases was lower (small risk of spread, October 2020). Several variables were included in the analysis, such as sociodemographic characteristics, mobility habits and preferences regarding future mobility solutions. Three models were developed, one for each pandemic stage. A comprehensive and reflective analysis of the models’ results, aligned with other studies’ findings, shows that the utility of public transport (PuT) and bicycles, based on individuals’ sociodemographic characteristics and choice attributes, compared to cars was affected by the pandemic state. Regarding the influence of crowding inside PuT during the different periods, it was concluded that users are more willing to pay an extra for their monthly passes to have available seats in PuT in the latter stage of the pandemic. The availability of dedicated bike lanes and a shower at the destination were considered attractive factors for cycling during the lockdown phase. Regarding the private car use, the cost of parking is the only attribute that demonstrates a causal effect on the preference for using this mode. This attribute holds a greater relevance during the post-lockdown and “new normal” periods. The results of this study can be helpful to guide policymakers on the definition of actions to counteract the increasing preference for private transport in the future and during disruptions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contrasting Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the First Full-Year School Street Initiatives in Ontario, Canada Just around the corner: Accessibility by proximity in the 15-minute city Diminishing returns of additional active travel infrastructure: Evaluating Barcelona's decade of sustainable transportation progress Effects of different mobility concepts in new residential areas Enhancing last mile connectivity using shared mobility: A stated preference survey of business park commuters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1