孤立性主动脉粥样硬化症成人预后的性别差异

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CJC Open Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.01.008
Alexander C. Egbe MD, MPH, MS , William R. Miranda MD , C. Charles Jain MD , Luke J. Burchill MBBS, PhD , Omar Abozied MBBS , Marwan H. Ahmed MBBS , Maan Jokhadar MD , Snigdha Karnakoti MBBS , Heidi M. Connolly MD
{"title":"孤立性主动脉粥样硬化症成人预后的性别差异","authors":"Alexander C. Egbe MD, MPH, MS ,&nbsp;William R. Miranda MD ,&nbsp;C. Charles Jain MD ,&nbsp;Luke J. Burchill MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Omar Abozied MBBS ,&nbsp;Marwan H. Ahmed MBBS ,&nbsp;Maan Jokhadar MD ,&nbsp;Snigdha Karnakoti MBBS ,&nbsp;Heidi M. Connolly MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Data are limited about the effect (or lack thereof) of sex on clinical outcomes in adults with coarctation of the aorta (COA). The purpose of this study was to compare atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk profile, blood pressure (BP) data, echocardiographic indices, and mortality between men and women with COA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective study of adults with COA, and no associated left-sided obstructive lesions, who received care at Mayo Clinic (2003-2022). ASCVD risk profile was assessed as the prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity, smoking history, and coronary artery disease. A 24-hour BP monitor was used to assess daytime and nighttime BP and calculate nocturnal dipping.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 621 patients with isolated COA, 375 (60%) were men, and 246 (40%) were women. Women had similar ASCVD risk profile and daytime BP as men. However, women had less nocturnal dipping (7 ± 5 mm Hg vs 16 ± 7 mm Hg, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), higher pulmonary artery mean pressure (23 mm Hg [interquartile range: 16-31] vs 20 mm Hg [interquartile range: 15-28], <em>P</em> = 0.04), and higher pulmonary vascular resistance index (3.41 ± 1.14 WU · m<sup>2</sup> vs 3.02 ± 0.76 WU · m<sup>2</sup>, <em>P</em> = 0.006). Female sex was associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.94) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.18).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Women had a higher risk of both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality compared to the risks in men. This difference may be related to the higher-than-expected ASCVD risk factors, abnormal nocturnal blood pressure, and pulmonary hypertension observed in women in this cohort. Further studies are required to identify optimal measures to address these risk factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"6 5","pages":"Pages 759-767"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24000441/pdfft?md5=eacd12a248566ecb345a82ff1a1b56a5&pid=1-s2.0-S2589790X24000441-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Differences in Outcomes of Adults With Isolated Coarctation of the Aorta\",\"authors\":\"Alexander C. Egbe MD, MPH, MS ,&nbsp;William R. Miranda MD ,&nbsp;C. Charles Jain MD ,&nbsp;Luke J. Burchill MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Omar Abozied MBBS ,&nbsp;Marwan H. Ahmed MBBS ,&nbsp;Maan Jokhadar MD ,&nbsp;Snigdha Karnakoti MBBS ,&nbsp;Heidi M. Connolly MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Data are limited about the effect (or lack thereof) of sex on clinical outcomes in adults with coarctation of the aorta (COA). The purpose of this study was to compare atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk profile, blood pressure (BP) data, echocardiographic indices, and mortality between men and women with COA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective study of adults with COA, and no associated left-sided obstructive lesions, who received care at Mayo Clinic (2003-2022). ASCVD risk profile was assessed as the prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity, smoking history, and coronary artery disease. A 24-hour BP monitor was used to assess daytime and nighttime BP and calculate nocturnal dipping.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 621 patients with isolated COA, 375 (60%) were men, and 246 (40%) were women. Women had similar ASCVD risk profile and daytime BP as men. However, women had less nocturnal dipping (7 ± 5 mm Hg vs 16 ± 7 mm Hg, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), higher pulmonary artery mean pressure (23 mm Hg [interquartile range: 16-31] vs 20 mm Hg [interquartile range: 15-28], <em>P</em> = 0.04), and higher pulmonary vascular resistance index (3.41 ± 1.14 WU · m<sup>2</sup> vs 3.02 ± 0.76 WU · m<sup>2</sup>, <em>P</em> = 0.006). Female sex was associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.94) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.18).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Women had a higher risk of both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality compared to the risks in men. This difference may be related to the higher-than-expected ASCVD risk factors, abnormal nocturnal blood pressure, and pulmonary hypertension observed in women in this cohort. Further studies are required to identify optimal measures to address these risk factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJC Open\",\"volume\":\"6 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 759-767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24000441/pdfft?md5=eacd12a248566ecb345a82ff1a1b56a5&pid=1-s2.0-S2589790X24000441-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJC Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24000441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景关于性别对患有主动脉共动脉症(COA)的成人临床预后的影响(或不影响)的数据很有限。本研究的目的是比较COA患者中男性和女性的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险概况、血压(BP)数据、超声心动图指数和死亡率。方法对在梅奥诊所接受治疗(2003-2022年)的患有COA且无相关左侧阻塞性病变的成人进行回顾性研究。ASCVD风险状况是指高血压、高脂血症、2型糖尿病、肥胖、吸烟史和冠状动脉疾病的患病率。结果 在621名孤立性COA患者中,男性375人(60%),女性246人(40%)。女性的 ASCVD 风险状况和日间血压与男性相似。然而,女性夜间血压下降较少(7 ± 5 mm Hg vs 16 ± 7 mm Hg,P < 0.001),肺动脉平均压力较高(23 mm Hg [四分位间范围:16-31] vs 20 mm Hg [四分位间范围:15-28],P = 0.04),肺血管阻力指数较高(3.41 ± 1.14 WU - m2 vs 3.02 ± 0.76 WU - m2,P = 0.006)。女性性别与全因死亡率(调整后危险比为 1.26,95% 置信区间为 1.04-1.94)和心血管死亡率(调整后危险比为 1.38,95% 置信区间为 1.09-2.18)相关。这一差异可能与该队列中观察到的女性ASCVD风险因素、夜间血压异常和肺动脉高压高于预期有关。要确定应对这些风险因素的最佳措施,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex Differences in Outcomes of Adults With Isolated Coarctation of the Aorta

Background

Data are limited about the effect (or lack thereof) of sex on clinical outcomes in adults with coarctation of the aorta (COA). The purpose of this study was to compare atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk profile, blood pressure (BP) data, echocardiographic indices, and mortality between men and women with COA.

Methods

Retrospective study of adults with COA, and no associated left-sided obstructive lesions, who received care at Mayo Clinic (2003-2022). ASCVD risk profile was assessed as the prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity, smoking history, and coronary artery disease. A 24-hour BP monitor was used to assess daytime and nighttime BP and calculate nocturnal dipping.

Results

Of 621 patients with isolated COA, 375 (60%) were men, and 246 (40%) were women. Women had similar ASCVD risk profile and daytime BP as men. However, women had less nocturnal dipping (7 ± 5 mm Hg vs 16 ± 7 mm Hg, P < 0.001), higher pulmonary artery mean pressure (23 mm Hg [interquartile range: 16-31] vs 20 mm Hg [interquartile range: 15-28], P = 0.04), and higher pulmonary vascular resistance index (3.41 ± 1.14 WU · m2 vs 3.02 ± 0.76 WU · m2, P = 0.006). Female sex was associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.94) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.18).

Conclusions

Women had a higher risk of both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality compared to the risks in men. This difference may be related to the higher-than-expected ASCVD risk factors, abnormal nocturnal blood pressure, and pulmonary hypertension observed in women in this cohort. Further studies are required to identify optimal measures to address these risk factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Papillary Fibroelastoma and Cerebrovascular Events: A Systematic Review Late-Onset Mitral Valve Prosthesis Dehiscence With Severe Paravalvular Leak—Infectious Versus Noninfectious Etiology Dilemma: A Case Report Assessing the Safety of Early Repatriation for Stable ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Coronary Sinus Reducer Improves Myocardial Perfusion in a Patient With Angina, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, and Coronary Microvascular Disease Fractured and Entrapped Coronary Angioplasty Balloon Successfully Managed with Rotational Atherectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1