植被模式和地形决定了半干旱砂岩山坡沟壑系统的侵蚀特征

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE European Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1111/ejss.13498
Ruipeng Zhu, Yang Yu, Dianjun Liu, Jingxue Wang, Zhiqiang Gao, Jing Liu, Francisco Serrano-Bernardo, Jesús Rodrigo-Comino
{"title":"植被模式和地形决定了半干旱砂岩山坡沟壑系统的侵蚀特征","authors":"Ruipeng Zhu,&nbsp;Yang Yu,&nbsp;Dianjun Liu,&nbsp;Jingxue Wang,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Gao,&nbsp;Jing Liu,&nbsp;Francisco Serrano-Bernardo,&nbsp;Jesús Rodrigo-Comino","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The hillslope-gully system serves as the primary contributor to both runoff and sediment yield. The WEPP (Water Erosion Prediction Project) model is often applied to investigate erosion characteristics at hillslope scale, demonstrating a high level of accuracy in simulating water erosion. In this study, according to in situ field monitoring (2014–2020) at a Pisha sandstone hillslope on the Loess Plateau, China, a total of 50 rainfall events’ data were used as climatic data to calibrate the soil parameters, and 11 different vegetation patterns and four slope gradients of hillslope-gully systems were installed as inputs for the management and slope data, respectively. In systems A, B, C and D, the hillslope gradients were defined as 5°, 8°, 10° and 12° and the gully gradients as 15°, 20°, 25° and 30°, respectively. The results showed that the steeper the slope, the more severe the erosion. However, there was a critical value for the effect of slope on runoff. When the slope exceeded 8° and the gully exceeded 20°, the runoff no longer increased further and even decreased. The reduction in runoff in hillslope-gully systems was in the following order (in mm): system D (3.4 ± 0.14) &gt; system C (3.4 ± 0.14) &gt; system B (3.39 ± 0.14) &gt; system A (3.12 ± 0.13). Increasing vegetation cover could reduce erosion. Differences in runoff between vegetation patterns were not significant (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) and ranged from 8% to 26%. However, there were significant differences in the sediment yield reduction benefits of different vegetation patterns (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), ranging from 17% to 66%. It was observed that vegetation located in the lower slope produced a more pronounced effect in mitigating sediment when the degree of cover was the same. We conclude that implementing watershed management strategies based on the vegetation and topographic attributes of hillslope-gully systems within the Loess Plateau, especially on Pisha sandstone hillslopes, serves as the fundamental approach to achieving sustainable watershed management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vegetation pattern and topography determine erosion characteristics in a semi-arid sandstone hillslope-gully system\",\"authors\":\"Ruipeng Zhu,&nbsp;Yang Yu,&nbsp;Dianjun Liu,&nbsp;Jingxue Wang,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Gao,&nbsp;Jing Liu,&nbsp;Francisco Serrano-Bernardo,&nbsp;Jesús Rodrigo-Comino\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.13498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The hillslope-gully system serves as the primary contributor to both runoff and sediment yield. The WEPP (Water Erosion Prediction Project) model is often applied to investigate erosion characteristics at hillslope scale, demonstrating a high level of accuracy in simulating water erosion. In this study, according to in situ field monitoring (2014–2020) at a Pisha sandstone hillslope on the Loess Plateau, China, a total of 50 rainfall events’ data were used as climatic data to calibrate the soil parameters, and 11 different vegetation patterns and four slope gradients of hillslope-gully systems were installed as inputs for the management and slope data, respectively. In systems A, B, C and D, the hillslope gradients were defined as 5°, 8°, 10° and 12° and the gully gradients as 15°, 20°, 25° and 30°, respectively. The results showed that the steeper the slope, the more severe the erosion. However, there was a critical value for the effect of slope on runoff. When the slope exceeded 8° and the gully exceeded 20°, the runoff no longer increased further and even decreased. The reduction in runoff in hillslope-gully systems was in the following order (in mm): system D (3.4 ± 0.14) &gt; system C (3.4 ± 0.14) &gt; system B (3.39 ± 0.14) &gt; system A (3.12 ± 0.13). Increasing vegetation cover could reduce erosion. Differences in runoff between vegetation patterns were not significant (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) and ranged from 8% to 26%. However, there were significant differences in the sediment yield reduction benefits of different vegetation patterns (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), ranging from 17% to 66%. It was observed that vegetation located in the lower slope produced a more pronounced effect in mitigating sediment when the degree of cover was the same. We conclude that implementing watershed management strategies based on the vegetation and topographic attributes of hillslope-gully systems within the Loess Plateau, especially on Pisha sandstone hillslopes, serves as the fundamental approach to achieving sustainable watershed management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"75 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13498\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

山坡-沟谷系统是径流和沉积物产生的主要因素。WEPP(水侵蚀预测项目)模型通常用于研究山坡尺度的侵蚀特征,在模拟水侵蚀方面具有很高的准确性。在本研究中,根据对中国黄土高原皮沙砂岩山坡的原位实地监测(2014-2020 年),共使用了 50 次降雨事件数据作为气候数据来校核土壤参数,并设置了 11 种不同植被模式和 4 种坡度的山坡-沟谷系统,分别作为管理和坡度数据的输入。在系统 A、B、C 和 D 中,山坡坡度分别为 5°、8°、10° 和 12°,沟谷坡度分别为 15°、20°、25° 和 30°。结果表明,坡度越陡,侵蚀越严重。然而,坡度对径流的影响存在一个临界值。当坡度超过 8° 和冲沟超过 20° 时,径流量不再进一步增加,甚至有所减少。山坡-沟谷系统的径流减少量依次为(单位:毫米):系统 D(3.4 ± 0.14);系统 C(3.4 ± 0.14);系统 B(3.39 ± 0.14);系统 A(3.12 ± 0.13)。增加植被覆盖可减少侵蚀。不同植被模式之间的径流差异不显著(p >0.05),范围在 8% 到 26% 之间。然而,不同植被模式在减少沉积物产量方面有显著差异(p < 0.05),从 17% 到 66% 不等。据观察,在覆盖度相同的情况下,位于下坡的植被在减少泥沙方面的效果更为明显。我们的结论是,根据黄土高原山坡沟壑系统的植被和地形属性实施流域管理策略,尤其是在皮沙砂岩山坡上,是实现流域可持续管理的基本方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vegetation pattern and topography determine erosion characteristics in a semi-arid sandstone hillslope-gully system

The hillslope-gully system serves as the primary contributor to both runoff and sediment yield. The WEPP (Water Erosion Prediction Project) model is often applied to investigate erosion characteristics at hillslope scale, demonstrating a high level of accuracy in simulating water erosion. In this study, according to in situ field monitoring (2014–2020) at a Pisha sandstone hillslope on the Loess Plateau, China, a total of 50 rainfall events’ data were used as climatic data to calibrate the soil parameters, and 11 different vegetation patterns and four slope gradients of hillslope-gully systems were installed as inputs for the management and slope data, respectively. In systems A, B, C and D, the hillslope gradients were defined as 5°, 8°, 10° and 12° and the gully gradients as 15°, 20°, 25° and 30°, respectively. The results showed that the steeper the slope, the more severe the erosion. However, there was a critical value for the effect of slope on runoff. When the slope exceeded 8° and the gully exceeded 20°, the runoff no longer increased further and even decreased. The reduction in runoff in hillslope-gully systems was in the following order (in mm): system D (3.4 ± 0.14) > system C (3.4 ± 0.14) > system B (3.39 ± 0.14) > system A (3.12 ± 0.13). Increasing vegetation cover could reduce erosion. Differences in runoff between vegetation patterns were not significant (p > 0.05) and ranged from 8% to 26%. However, there were significant differences in the sediment yield reduction benefits of different vegetation patterns (p < 0.05), ranging from 17% to 66%. It was observed that vegetation located in the lower slope produced a more pronounced effect in mitigating sediment when the degree of cover was the same. We conclude that implementing watershed management strategies based on the vegetation and topographic attributes of hillslope-gully systems within the Loess Plateau, especially on Pisha sandstone hillslopes, serves as the fundamental approach to achieving sustainable watershed management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
期刊最新文献
Easily mobilized metals and acidity in acid sulfate soils across the Swedish coastal plains ‘Shifting gears ain't easy’: Disciplinary resistances to perspective shifts in soil science and how to move forward Cover cropping in organic reduced tillage systems: Maximizing soil cover or plant above ground biomass input? No relationship between outputs of simple humus balance calculators (VDLUFA and STAND) and soil organic carbon trends A GSD-driven approach to deriving stochastic soil strength parameters under hybrid machine learning models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1