{"title":"了解英国分诊护士的人口统计、培训经历和决策实践。","authors":"Hugh Gorick, Marie McGee, Toby Smith","doi":"10.7748/en.2024.e2202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International research suggests that triage nurses' decision-making practices and training experiences vary significantly across emergency departments (EDs). However, there does not appear to be similar research published in the UK. Understanding factors, such as demographics, training and decision-making could provide a picture of triage nurses working in UK EDs, identify the interventions required to improve practice and inform further research.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the demographics, training experiences and decision-making practices of registered nurses who assess patient acuity at triage in UK EDs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study used an online, descriptive, cross-sectional survey design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 triage nurses from across the UK responded to the survey. Most (61) had achieved a bachelor's degree as their highest qualification, while 3 had postgraduate qualifications. Respondents had a median of seven years since qualifying, six years working in their current ED and five years working in triage and used a range of titles to describe their role. Low staffing and busy ED environments increased respondents' stress levels, which affected confidence in triage decision-making abilities among less experienced nurses. More experienced respondents coped with their stress by relying on their knowledge and skills. Not all respondents had received triage training, and for those that had, the training varied in type and frequency across EDs. Overall, respondents had low satisfaction with the amount, quality and content of the training they had received.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for safer staffing levels in EDs and greater support for staff welfare. The development of national standards, incorporating defined knowledge and skills and set time periods for refresher training, is required to enhance triage practice in EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94315,"journal":{"name":"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the demographics, training experiences and decision-making practices of UK triage nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Hugh Gorick, Marie McGee, Toby Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/en.2024.e2202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International research suggests that triage nurses' decision-making practices and training experiences vary significantly across emergency departments (EDs). However, there does not appear to be similar research published in the UK. Understanding factors, such as demographics, training and decision-making could provide a picture of triage nurses working in UK EDs, identify the interventions required to improve practice and inform further research.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the demographics, training experiences and decision-making practices of registered nurses who assess patient acuity at triage in UK EDs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study used an online, descriptive, cross-sectional survey design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 triage nurses from across the UK responded to the survey. Most (61) had achieved a bachelor's degree as their highest qualification, while 3 had postgraduate qualifications. Respondents had a median of seven years since qualifying, six years working in their current ED and five years working in triage and used a range of titles to describe their role. Low staffing and busy ED environments increased respondents' stress levels, which affected confidence in triage decision-making abilities among less experienced nurses. More experienced respondents coped with their stress by relying on their knowledge and skills. Not all respondents had received triage training, and for those that had, the training varied in type and frequency across EDs. Overall, respondents had low satisfaction with the amount, quality and content of the training they had received.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for safer staffing levels in EDs and greater support for staff welfare. The development of national standards, incorporating defined knowledge and skills and set time periods for refresher training, is required to enhance triage practice in EDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2024.e2202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2024.e2202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding the demographics, training experiences and decision-making practices of UK triage nurses.
Background: International research suggests that triage nurses' decision-making practices and training experiences vary significantly across emergency departments (EDs). However, there does not appear to be similar research published in the UK. Understanding factors, such as demographics, training and decision-making could provide a picture of triage nurses working in UK EDs, identify the interventions required to improve practice and inform further research.
Aim: To explore the demographics, training experiences and decision-making practices of registered nurses who assess patient acuity at triage in UK EDs.
Method: The study used an online, descriptive, cross-sectional survey design.
Results: A total of 51 triage nurses from across the UK responded to the survey. Most (61) had achieved a bachelor's degree as their highest qualification, while 3 had postgraduate qualifications. Respondents had a median of seven years since qualifying, six years working in their current ED and five years working in triage and used a range of titles to describe their role. Low staffing and busy ED environments increased respondents' stress levels, which affected confidence in triage decision-making abilities among less experienced nurses. More experienced respondents coped with their stress by relying on their knowledge and skills. Not all respondents had received triage training, and for those that had, the training varied in type and frequency across EDs. Overall, respondents had low satisfaction with the amount, quality and content of the training they had received.
Conclusion: There is a need for safer staffing levels in EDs and greater support for staff welfare. The development of national standards, incorporating defined knowledge and skills and set time periods for refresher training, is required to enhance triage practice in EDs.