美国军人脑外伤后的服务需求和神经行为功能。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1037/rep0000556
Rael T Lange, Louis M French, Sara M Lippa, Alicia A Rogers, Kelly Gillow, Corie E Tippett, Jason M Bailie, Lars Hungerford, Jan Kennedy, Tracey A Brickell
{"title":"美国军人脑外伤后的服务需求和神经行为功能。","authors":"Rael T Lange, Louis M French, Sara M Lippa, Alicia A Rogers, Kelly Gillow, Corie E Tippett, Jason M Bailie, Lars Hungerford, Jan Kennedy, Tracey A Brickell","doi":"10.1037/rep0000556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to (a) identify the prevalence and barriers of self-reported service needs in a military sample with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI), (b) evaluate the influence of the number of service needs on overall neurobehavioral functioning, and (c) examine the longitudinal trajectories of service needs over time.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 941 U.S. service members and veterans (SMVs) prospectively enrolled into four groups: uncomplicated mild TBI (MTBI; <i>n</i> = 455); complicated mild, moderate, severe, and penetrating TBI combined (STBI; <i>n</i> = 164); injured controls (IC, <i>n</i> = 138); and noninjured controls (NIC, <i>n</i> = 184). Participants completed a battery of neurobehavioral measures, as well as a self-reported service need interview, 12 or more month's postinjury. In addition, a longitudinal cohort (<i>n</i> = 553) was included using a subset of participants who had completed two or more evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When examining the total number of self-reported service needs, there was a greater proportion of the MTBI and STBI groups that had a higher number of service needs compared to the NIC and IC groups (<i>p</i> < .001). In the MTBI and STBI groups, as the number of service needs increased, worse scores were found on all neurobehavioral measures. In the longitudinal cohort, the STBI group reported the highest number of service needs that persisted or developed over time (six needs), followed by the MTBI (three needs), IC (one need), and NIC (zero need) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings call for the need to enhance the provision of information given to service members and veterans following TBI regarding available services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service needs and neurobehavioral functioning following traumatic brain injury in U.S. military personnel.\",\"authors\":\"Rael T Lange, Louis M French, Sara M Lippa, Alicia A Rogers, Kelly Gillow, Corie E Tippett, Jason M Bailie, Lars Hungerford, Jan Kennedy, Tracey A Brickell\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/rep0000556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to (a) identify the prevalence and barriers of self-reported service needs in a military sample with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI), (b) evaluate the influence of the number of service needs on overall neurobehavioral functioning, and (c) examine the longitudinal trajectories of service needs over time.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 941 U.S. service members and veterans (SMVs) prospectively enrolled into four groups: uncomplicated mild TBI (MTBI; <i>n</i> = 455); complicated mild, moderate, severe, and penetrating TBI combined (STBI; <i>n</i> = 164); injured controls (IC, <i>n</i> = 138); and noninjured controls (NIC, <i>n</i> = 184). Participants completed a battery of neurobehavioral measures, as well as a self-reported service need interview, 12 or more month's postinjury. In addition, a longitudinal cohort (<i>n</i> = 553) was included using a subset of participants who had completed two or more evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When examining the total number of self-reported service needs, there was a greater proportion of the MTBI and STBI groups that had a higher number of service needs compared to the NIC and IC groups (<i>p</i> < .001). In the MTBI and STBI groups, as the number of service needs increased, worse scores were found on all neurobehavioral measures. In the longitudinal cohort, the STBI group reported the highest number of service needs that persisted or developed over time (six needs), followed by the MTBI (three needs), IC (one need), and NIC (zero need) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings call for the need to enhance the provision of information given to service members and veterans following TBI regarding available services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000556\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000556","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是:(a) 确定有无脑外伤(TBI)的军人样本中自我报告的服务需求的普遍性和障碍;(b) 评估服务需求数量对整体神经行为功能的影响;(c) 研究服务需求随时间变化的纵向轨迹:参与者为 941 名美国军人和退伍军人(SMVs),他们被前瞻性地分为四组:无并发症轻度 TBI(MTBI;n = 455);并发症轻度、中度、重度和穿透性 TBI 合并(STBI;n = 164);受伤对照组(IC,n = 138);非受伤对照组(NIC,n = 184)。参与者在受伤后 12 个月或更长时间内完成了一系列神经行为测量以及自我服务需求访谈。此外,还利用完成两次或两次以上评估的参与者子集纳入了一个纵向队列(n = 553):在检查自我报告的服务需求总数时,与 NIC 组和 IC 组相比,MTBI 组和 STBI 组中有更大比例的人需要更多的服务(p < .001)。在 MTBI 组和 STBI 组中,随着服务需求数量的增加,所有神经行为测量的得分都会降低。在纵向队列中,STBI 组报告的随时间推移而持续或发展的服务需求数量最多(6 项需求),其次是 MTBI 组(3 项需求)、IC 组(1 项需求)和 NIC 组(0 项需求):结论:这些研究结果表明,有必要加强向发生创伤性脑损伤后的军人和退伍军人提供有关可用服务的信息。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Service needs and neurobehavioral functioning following traumatic brain injury in U.S. military personnel.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to (a) identify the prevalence and barriers of self-reported service needs in a military sample with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI), (b) evaluate the influence of the number of service needs on overall neurobehavioral functioning, and (c) examine the longitudinal trajectories of service needs over time.

Method: Participants were 941 U.S. service members and veterans (SMVs) prospectively enrolled into four groups: uncomplicated mild TBI (MTBI; n = 455); complicated mild, moderate, severe, and penetrating TBI combined (STBI; n = 164); injured controls (IC, n = 138); and noninjured controls (NIC, n = 184). Participants completed a battery of neurobehavioral measures, as well as a self-reported service need interview, 12 or more month's postinjury. In addition, a longitudinal cohort (n = 553) was included using a subset of participants who had completed two or more evaluations.

Results: When examining the total number of self-reported service needs, there was a greater proportion of the MTBI and STBI groups that had a higher number of service needs compared to the NIC and IC groups (p < .001). In the MTBI and STBI groups, as the number of service needs increased, worse scores were found on all neurobehavioral measures. In the longitudinal cohort, the STBI group reported the highest number of service needs that persisted or developed over time (six needs), followed by the MTBI (three needs), IC (one need), and NIC (zero need) groups.

Conclusions: These findings call for the need to enhance the provision of information given to service members and veterans following TBI regarding available services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1