针对铜绿假单胞菌感染伤口的高强度蓝光(450-460 纳米)光疗。

Andreas Zoric, Mahsa Bagheri, Maria von Kohout, Tara Fardoust, Paul C Fuchs, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer
{"title":"针对铜绿假单胞菌感染伤口的高强度蓝光(450-460 纳米)光疗。","authors":"Andreas Zoric, Mahsa Bagheri, Maria von Kohout, Tara Fardoust, Paul C Fuchs, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer","doi":"10.1089/photob.2023.0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Nosocomial wound infection with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan<sup>®</sup>; PRT). <b><i>Results:</i></b> aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log<sub>10</sub> CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) or CA (2.48 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) and CA (2.30 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":"42 5","pages":"356-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Intensity Blue Light (450-460 nm) Phototherapy for <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>-Infected Wounds.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Zoric, Mahsa Bagheri, Maria von Kohout, Tara Fardoust, Paul C Fuchs, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/photob.2023.0180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Nosocomial wound infection with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan<sup>®</sup>; PRT). <b><i>Results:</i></b> aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log<sub>10</sub> CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) or CA (2.48 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) and CA (2.30 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\"42 5\",\"pages\":\"356-365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa,PA)引起的伤口感染是一种严重的并发症,往往是烧伤患者败血症死亡的原因。目的:高强度抗菌蓝光(aBL)治疗可能是治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染的一种替代疗法,本研究将对其进行研究。研究方法通过悬浮试验、生物膜试验和人体皮肤伤口模型确定发光二极管阵列(450-460 纳米;300 毫瓦/平方厘米;15/30 分钟;270/540 焦耳/平方厘米)对 PA 的抗菌效果,并与 15 分钟局部应用 3% 柠檬酸(CA)和伤口冲洗液(Prontosan®;PRT)进行比较。结果:在悬浮试验中,aBL 可减少细菌数量[2.51-3.56 log10 菌落总数(CFU)/mL],而 PRT 或 CA 处理可减少 4.64 或 6.60 log10 CFU/mL。而 PRT 或 CA 处理则减少了 25% 或 13%。在这里,aBL 可减少生物膜中的细菌数量(1.30-1.64 log10 CFU),但减少程度低于 PRT(2.41 log10 CFU)或 CA(2.48 log10 CFU)。在伤口皮肤模型中,aBL(2.21-2.33 log10 CFU)减少细菌的程度与 PRT(2.26 log10 CFU)和 CA(2.30 log10 CFU)相同。结论:aBL 在短时间内对 PA 和生物膜的形成具有显著的抗菌效果。然而,将 aBL 应用于伤口治疗需要有效的主动皮肤冷却和眼睛保护,这反过来又会限制临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-Intensity Blue Light (450-460 nm) Phototherapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Wounds.

Background: Nosocomial wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. Objective: High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. Methods: Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm2; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm2) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan®; PRT). Results: aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log10 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log10 CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log10 CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log10 CFU) or CA (2.48 log10 CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log10 CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log10 CFU) and CA (2.30 log10 CFU). Conclusions: aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
期刊最新文献
Photodynamic Therapy or Palliative Resection Versus Biliary Stenting for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis. Microneedling Radiofrequency for Acne Vulgaris in Adolescents as a Promising Device-Based Treatment: A Clinical Case Series. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Scoping Review. "Five-Step" Vaporization of the Prostate Using 180-W XPS Greenlight Laser in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia of Large Volume: Improved Efficacy and Safety. Effects of Laser Acupuncture on Metabolic Functions of Sedentary People: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1