Andreas Zoric, Mahsa Bagheri, Maria von Kohout, Tara Fardoust, Paul C Fuchs, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer
{"title":"针对铜绿假单胞菌感染伤口的高强度蓝光(450-460 纳米)光疗。","authors":"Andreas Zoric, Mahsa Bagheri, Maria von Kohout, Tara Fardoust, Paul C Fuchs, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer","doi":"10.1089/photob.2023.0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Nosocomial wound infection with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan<sup>®</sup>; PRT). <b><i>Results:</i></b> aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log<sub>10</sub> CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) or CA (2.48 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) and CA (2.30 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":"42 5","pages":"356-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-Intensity Blue Light (450-460 nm) Phototherapy for <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>-Infected Wounds.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Zoric, Mahsa Bagheri, Maria von Kohout, Tara Fardoust, Paul C Fuchs, Jennifer L Schiefer, Christian Opländer\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/photob.2023.0180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Nosocomial wound infection with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan<sup>®</sup>; PRT). <b><i>Results:</i></b> aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log<sub>10</sub> colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log<sub>10</sub> CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) or CA (2.48 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log<sub>10</sub> CFU) and CA (2.30 log<sub>10</sub> CFU). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\"42 5\",\"pages\":\"356-365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
High-Intensity Blue Light (450-460 nm) Phototherapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Wounds.
Background: Nosocomial wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. Objective: High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. Methods: Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm2; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm2) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan®; PRT). Results: aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log10 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log10 CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log10 CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log10 CFU) or CA (2.48 log10 CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log10 CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log10 CFU) and CA (2.30 log10 CFU). Conclusions: aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.