Shivaraj Patil , Chaitanya Rojulpote , William Frick , Abhijit Bhattaru , Karanjit Sandhu , Aditya Bakhshi , Anum Shahzad , Gregg Pressman , Antonio Chamoun , Div Verma , Chien-Jung Lin
{"title":"伴有冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的急性冠状动脉综合征的性别、种族和民族差异","authors":"Shivaraj Patil , Chaitanya Rojulpote , William Frick , Abhijit Bhattaru , Karanjit Sandhu , Aditya Bakhshi , Anum Shahzad , Gregg Pressman , Antonio Chamoun , Div Verma , Chien-Jung Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) is a major clinical challenge of contemporary percutaneous revascularization and portends adverse cardiovascular outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate gender, race, and ethnicity related outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with ISR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Primary hospitalizations for ACS and ISR in the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019 were included. Patients were stratified by gender, race, and ethnicity. The primary end points were all cause in-hospital mortality and coronary revascularization defined as composite of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), balloon angioplasty and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, a nationally weighted total of 97,680 patients with ACS and ISR were included. There was substantial variation in comorbidities, with greatest burden among Black and Hispanic women. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 2.4 % in the study cohort, but significantly higher in women (2.1 % vs. 2.1 %; aOR: 1.282, 95 % CI: 1.174–1.4; <em>p</em> < 0.001) and revascularization rates were significantly lower in women (77 % vs 80.2 %; aOR: 0.891, 95 % CI: 0.862–0.921; p < 0.001). Compared to White men, all women except Hispanic women, had significantly higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality, while White women, Black men and women, and Hispanic men had lower odds of revascularization.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are significant gender, racial, and ethnic related differences in revascularization practices and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS and ISR with an adverse impact on women, racial and ethnic minorities in the U.S.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100405"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400048X/pdfft?md5=4d34c671fbecd476dc017116fa6eb4d6&pid=1-s2.0-S266660222400048X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender, racial and ethnic disparities in acute coronary syndromes with coronary in-stent restenosis\",\"authors\":\"Shivaraj Patil , Chaitanya Rojulpote , William Frick , Abhijit Bhattaru , Karanjit Sandhu , Aditya Bakhshi , Anum Shahzad , Gregg Pressman , Antonio Chamoun , Div Verma , Chien-Jung Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) is a major clinical challenge of contemporary percutaneous revascularization and portends adverse cardiovascular outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate gender, race, and ethnicity related outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with ISR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Primary hospitalizations for ACS and ISR in the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019 were included. Patients were stratified by gender, race, and ethnicity. The primary end points were all cause in-hospital mortality and coronary revascularization defined as composite of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), balloon angioplasty and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, a nationally weighted total of 97,680 patients with ACS and ISR were included. There was substantial variation in comorbidities, with greatest burden among Black and Hispanic women. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 2.4 % in the study cohort, but significantly higher in women (2.1 % vs. 2.1 %; aOR: 1.282, 95 % CI: 1.174–1.4; <em>p</em> < 0.001) and revascularization rates were significantly lower in women (77 % vs 80.2 %; aOR: 0.891, 95 % CI: 0.862–0.921; p < 0.001). Compared to White men, all women except Hispanic women, had significantly higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality, while White women, Black men and women, and Hispanic men had lower odds of revascularization.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are significant gender, racial, and ethnic related differences in revascularization practices and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS and ISR with an adverse impact on women, racial and ethnic minorities in the U.S.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400048X/pdfft?md5=4d34c671fbecd476dc017116fa6eb4d6&pid=1-s2.0-S266660222400048X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400048X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400048X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender, racial and ethnic disparities in acute coronary syndromes with coronary in-stent restenosis
Background
Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) is a major clinical challenge of contemporary percutaneous revascularization and portends adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
Objectives
We aimed to evaluate gender, race, and ethnicity related outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with ISR.
Methods
Primary hospitalizations for ACS and ISR in the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019 were included. Patients were stratified by gender, race, and ethnicity. The primary end points were all cause in-hospital mortality and coronary revascularization defined as composite of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), balloon angioplasty and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Results
During the study period, a nationally weighted total of 97,680 patients with ACS and ISR were included. There was substantial variation in comorbidities, with greatest burden among Black and Hispanic women. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 2.4 % in the study cohort, but significantly higher in women (2.1 % vs. 2.1 %; aOR: 1.282, 95 % CI: 1.174–1.4; p < 0.001) and revascularization rates were significantly lower in women (77 % vs 80.2 %; aOR: 0.891, 95 % CI: 0.862–0.921; p < 0.001). Compared to White men, all women except Hispanic women, had significantly higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality, while White women, Black men and women, and Hispanic men had lower odds of revascularization.
Conclusions
There are significant gender, racial, and ethnic related differences in revascularization practices and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS and ISR with an adverse impact on women, racial and ethnic minorities in the U.S.