{"title":"松辽盆地徐家围子断陷登楼库地层致密砂岩气藏的烃源及充烃过程与储层致密期的关系","authors":"Huan Miao, Zhenxue Jiang, Jiaming Lu, Chengju Zhang, Lidong Shi, Lidong Sun, Liang Yang, Peng Shang","doi":"10.1007/s11053-024-10359-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The exploration level of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Denglouku Formation (DF) in the Xujiaweizi Fault Depression is low, and hydrocarbon source and accumulation process remain unclear. Through the analysis of natural gas geochemistry, X-ray diffraction, thin section observation, scanning electron microscope, physical property testing, cathodoluminescence, fluid inclusions, and basin simulation, we examine source of hydrocarbon, the period of hydrocarbon accumulation, and the evolution of physical properties of the tight sandstone gas in the DF. Additionally, the formation process of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the DF is discussed. The results reveal the following: (1) the tight sandstone gas in the DF is categorized as III kerogen cracking gas, primarily sourced from dark mudstone of the second member of the DF, with some contribution from dark mudstone of the Shahezi Formation. (2) The tight sandstone in the DF is in stage B of middle diagenesis. Based on apparent compaction rate, apparent cementation rate, and apparent dissolution rate, it can be divided into four diagenetic facies: (1) strong compaction–medium cementation–weak dissolution facies; (2) medium compaction–strong cementation–medium dissolution facies; (3) medium compaction–strong cementation–weak dissolution facies; and (4) medium compaction–medium cementation–medium dissolution facies. The predominant diagenetic facies are the medium compaction–strong cementation–medium dissolution facies and medium compaction–medium cementation–medium dissolution facies. (3) The hydrocarbon charging period of the DF in study area ranged from 98 to 67.5 Ma. This period is earlier than the tight period of the strong compaction–medium cementation–weak dissolution facies sandstone and later than the tight period of the medium compaction–strong cementation–medium dissolution facies, medium compaction–strong cementation–weak dissolution facies, and medium compaction–medium cementation–medium dissolution facies sandstone. Consequently, two types of tight sandstone gas reservoirs exist in study area: (1) tight sandstone gas reservoir with tight first and then accumulation type and (2) composite tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Our research offers theoretical instruction for exploration of deep tight sandstone gas in northern Songliao Basin.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrocarbon Source and Relationship between Hydrocarbon Charging Process and Reservoir Tight Period of the Denglouku Formation Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs in the Xujiaweizi Fault Depression, Songliao Basin\",\"authors\":\"Huan Miao, Zhenxue Jiang, Jiaming Lu, Chengju Zhang, Lidong Shi, Lidong Sun, Liang Yang, Peng Shang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11053-024-10359-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The exploration level of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Denglouku Formation (DF) in the Xujiaweizi Fault Depression is low, and hydrocarbon source and accumulation process remain unclear. Through the analysis of natural gas geochemistry, X-ray diffraction, thin section observation, scanning electron microscope, physical property testing, cathodoluminescence, fluid inclusions, and basin simulation, we examine source of hydrocarbon, the period of hydrocarbon accumulation, and the evolution of physical properties of the tight sandstone gas in the DF. Additionally, the formation process of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the DF is discussed. The results reveal the following: (1) the tight sandstone gas in the DF is categorized as III kerogen cracking gas, primarily sourced from dark mudstone of the second member of the DF, with some contribution from dark mudstone of the Shahezi Formation. (2) The tight sandstone in the DF is in stage B of middle diagenesis. Based on apparent compaction rate, apparent cementation rate, and apparent dissolution rate, it can be divided into four diagenetic facies: (1) strong compaction–medium cementation–weak dissolution facies; (2) medium compaction–strong cementation–medium dissolution facies; (3) medium compaction–strong cementation–weak dissolution facies; and (4) medium compaction–medium cementation–medium dissolution facies. The predominant diagenetic facies are the medium compaction–strong cementation–medium dissolution facies and medium compaction–medium cementation–medium dissolution facies. (3) The hydrocarbon charging period of the DF in study area ranged from 98 to 67.5 Ma. This period is earlier than the tight period of the strong compaction–medium cementation–weak dissolution facies sandstone and later than the tight period of the medium compaction–strong cementation–medium dissolution facies, medium compaction–strong cementation–weak dissolution facies, and medium compaction–medium cementation–medium dissolution facies sandstone. Consequently, two types of tight sandstone gas reservoirs exist in study area: (1) tight sandstone gas reservoir with tight first and then accumulation type and (2) composite tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Our research offers theoretical instruction for exploration of deep tight sandstone gas in northern Songliao Basin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10359-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10359-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
徐家围子断陷凹陷登楼库地层致密砂岩气藏勘探程度较低,烃源及聚集过程尚不清楚。通过天然气地球化学、X 射线衍射、薄片观察、扫描电镜、物性测试、阴极发光、流体包裹体、盆地模拟等分析手段,研究了登楼库地层致密砂岩气的烃源、烃积聚期和物性演化过程。此外,还讨论了 DF 中致密砂岩气藏的形成过程。研究结果表明(1) 东亚盆地致密砂岩气属于Ⅲ角质裂解气,主要来源于东亚盆地第二系深色泥岩,部分来源于沙河子地层深色泥岩。(2)DF 中的致密砂岩处于成因中期的 B 阶段。根据表观压实率、表观胶结率和表观溶解率,可将其划分为四个成因面:(1)强压实-中胶结-弱溶解面;(2)中压实-强胶结-中溶解面;(3)中压实-强胶结-弱溶解面;(4)中压实-中胶结-中溶解面。主要成岩面为中等压实-强胶结-中等溶解面和中等压实-中等胶结-中等溶解面。(3)研究区DF的充烃期为98-67.5Ma。这一时期早于强压实-中胶结-弱溶蚀面砂岩的致密期,晚于中压实-强胶结-中溶蚀面、中压实-强胶结-弱溶蚀面、中压实-中胶结-中溶蚀面砂岩的致密期。因此,研究区存在两类致密砂岩气藏:(1)先致密后堆积型致密砂岩气藏;(2)复合致密砂岩气藏。我们的研究为松辽盆地北部深层致密砂岩气勘探提供了理论指导。
Hydrocarbon Source and Relationship between Hydrocarbon Charging Process and Reservoir Tight Period of the Denglouku Formation Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs in the Xujiaweizi Fault Depression, Songliao Basin
The exploration level of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Denglouku Formation (DF) in the Xujiaweizi Fault Depression is low, and hydrocarbon source and accumulation process remain unclear. Through the analysis of natural gas geochemistry, X-ray diffraction, thin section observation, scanning electron microscope, physical property testing, cathodoluminescence, fluid inclusions, and basin simulation, we examine source of hydrocarbon, the period of hydrocarbon accumulation, and the evolution of physical properties of the tight sandstone gas in the DF. Additionally, the formation process of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the DF is discussed. The results reveal the following: (1) the tight sandstone gas in the DF is categorized as III kerogen cracking gas, primarily sourced from dark mudstone of the second member of the DF, with some contribution from dark mudstone of the Shahezi Formation. (2) The tight sandstone in the DF is in stage B of middle diagenesis. Based on apparent compaction rate, apparent cementation rate, and apparent dissolution rate, it can be divided into four diagenetic facies: (1) strong compaction–medium cementation–weak dissolution facies; (2) medium compaction–strong cementation–medium dissolution facies; (3) medium compaction–strong cementation–weak dissolution facies; and (4) medium compaction–medium cementation–medium dissolution facies. The predominant diagenetic facies are the medium compaction–strong cementation–medium dissolution facies and medium compaction–medium cementation–medium dissolution facies. (3) The hydrocarbon charging period of the DF in study area ranged from 98 to 67.5 Ma. This period is earlier than the tight period of the strong compaction–medium cementation–weak dissolution facies sandstone and later than the tight period of the medium compaction–strong cementation–medium dissolution facies, medium compaction–strong cementation–weak dissolution facies, and medium compaction–medium cementation–medium dissolution facies sandstone. Consequently, two types of tight sandstone gas reservoirs exist in study area: (1) tight sandstone gas reservoir with tight first and then accumulation type and (2) composite tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Our research offers theoretical instruction for exploration of deep tight sandstone gas in northern Songliao Basin.
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.