M. Han, S. H. Li, Y. Yao, Yijiao Zhao, L. P. You, Q. Zheng, X. M. Xu
{"title":"牙龈内陷的风险因素:回顾性研究","authors":"M. Han, S. H. Li, Y. Yao, Yijiao Zhao, L. P. You, Q. Zheng, X. M. Xu","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to identify the risk factors for gingival invagination during orthodontic treatment after premolar extraction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The medical records of 135 patients who had undergone interdental space closure after premolar extraction were collected, and cone beam computed tomography was performed to determine the presence of gingival invagination. The risk factors were examined using mixed-effects models and generalized propensity score weighting (GPSW) to develop a predictive model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Univariate analysis revealed that the extraction site, buccal bone thickness 4 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction (MB1), mid-root buccal bone thickness (MB2) and vertical skeletal relationships were related to gingival invagination (<i>p</i> < .05). Furthermore, a subsequent multivariable mixed-effects model analysis indicated a significantly increased risk of gingival invagination at MB1 < 1 mm (<i>p</i> < .001; odds ratio [OR<sub>MB1≤0.5mm</sub>] = 29.304; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.986–93.807; OR<sub>0.5<MB1<1mm</sub> = 22.309; 95% CI: 9.890–50.320). Row mixing model analysis performed after balancing covariates using GPSW showed that MB1 and vertical skeletal relationships were associated with gingival invagination (<i>p</i> < .05) with an increase in ORs. Therefore, in addition to MB1, the risk of gingival invagination is higher in hyperdivergent and normodivergent patients. During the establishment and internal validation of the predictive model, the area under the curve for all three models exceeded 0.7.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The risk of gingival invagination is higher in patients with MB1 < 1 mm and in normodivergent or hyperdivergent patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for gingival invagination: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"M. Han, S. H. Li, Y. Yao, Yijiao Zhao, L. P. You, Q. Zheng, X. M. Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcpe.14005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to identify the risk factors for gingival invagination during orthodontic treatment after premolar extraction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The medical records of 135 patients who had undergone interdental space closure after premolar extraction were collected, and cone beam computed tomography was performed to determine the presence of gingival invagination. The risk factors were examined using mixed-effects models and generalized propensity score weighting (GPSW) to develop a predictive model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Univariate analysis revealed that the extraction site, buccal bone thickness 4 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction (MB1), mid-root buccal bone thickness (MB2) and vertical skeletal relationships were related to gingival invagination (<i>p</i> < .05). Furthermore, a subsequent multivariable mixed-effects model analysis indicated a significantly increased risk of gingival invagination at MB1 < 1 mm (<i>p</i> < .001; odds ratio [OR<sub>MB1≤0.5mm</sub>] = 29.304; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.986–93.807; OR<sub>0.5<MB1<1mm</sub> = 22.309; 95% CI: 9.890–50.320). Row mixing model analysis performed after balancing covariates using GPSW showed that MB1 and vertical skeletal relationships were associated with gingival invagination (<i>p</i> < .05) with an increase in ORs. Therefore, in addition to MB1, the risk of gingival invagination is higher in hyperdivergent and normodivergent patients. During the establishment and internal validation of the predictive model, the area under the curve for all three models exceeded 0.7.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The risk of gingival invagination is higher in patients with MB1 < 1 mm and in normodivergent or hyperdivergent patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpe.14005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpe.14005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk factors for gingival invagination: A retrospective study
Aim
This study aimed to identify the risk factors for gingival invagination during orthodontic treatment after premolar extraction.
Materials and Methods
The medical records of 135 patients who had undergone interdental space closure after premolar extraction were collected, and cone beam computed tomography was performed to determine the presence of gingival invagination. The risk factors were examined using mixed-effects models and generalized propensity score weighting (GPSW) to develop a predictive model.
Results
Univariate analysis revealed that the extraction site, buccal bone thickness 4 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction (MB1), mid-root buccal bone thickness (MB2) and vertical skeletal relationships were related to gingival invagination (p < .05). Furthermore, a subsequent multivariable mixed-effects model analysis indicated a significantly increased risk of gingival invagination at MB1 < 1 mm (p < .001; odds ratio [ORMB1≤0.5mm] = 29.304; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.986–93.807; OR0.5<MB1<1mm = 22.309; 95% CI: 9.890–50.320). Row mixing model analysis performed after balancing covariates using GPSW showed that MB1 and vertical skeletal relationships were associated with gingival invagination (p < .05) with an increase in ORs. Therefore, in addition to MB1, the risk of gingival invagination is higher in hyperdivergent and normodivergent patients. During the establishment and internal validation of the predictive model, the area under the curve for all three models exceeded 0.7.
Conclusions
The risk of gingival invagination is higher in patients with MB1 < 1 mm and in normodivergent or hyperdivergent patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.