{"title":"当今时代的推荐信。","authors":"Michael Gottlieb, Dowin Boatright, Adaira Landry","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Letters of reference (LORs) are a common component of the application process for residency training programs. With the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 transitioning to pass/fail grading and with the increasing use of holistic review, the potential role of LORs is rising in importance. Among some key benefits are the ability to provide a broader and more holistic view of applicants, which can include highlighting elements of experiences or skills that could be missed in their application, as well as providing a third-party assessment of the applicant external to their rotation experiences. However, LORs also face issues, including variation in quality, challenges with comparability, and risk of bias. In this article, the authors discuss the unique benefits, limitations, and best practice recommendations for LORs in academic medicine. The authors also discuss future directions, including the role of artificial intelligence, unblinded, and co-created LORs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"942-945"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letters of Reference in the Current Era.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Gottlieb, Dowin Boatright, Adaira Landry\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Letters of reference (LORs) are a common component of the application process for residency training programs. With the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 transitioning to pass/fail grading and with the increasing use of holistic review, the potential role of LORs is rising in importance. Among some key benefits are the ability to provide a broader and more holistic view of applicants, which can include highlighting elements of experiences or skills that could be missed in their application, as well as providing a third-party assessment of the applicant external to their rotation experiences. However, LORs also face issues, including variation in quality, challenges with comparability, and risk of bias. In this article, the authors discuss the unique benefits, limitations, and best practice recommendations for LORs in academic medicine. The authors also discuss future directions, including the role of artificial intelligence, unblinded, and co-created LORs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"942-945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005775\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:推荐信(LOR)是住院医师培训项目申请过程中的一个常见组成部分。随着美国医学执业资格考试步骤 1 过渡到通过/未通过评分,以及越来越多地使用整体审查,推荐信的潜在作用正变得越来越重要。背书人的一些主要好处是能够对申请人提供更广泛、更全面的了解,包括强调申请材料中可能遗漏的经历或技能要素,以及提供轮转经历之外的第三方对申请人的评估。然而,LOR 也面临着一些问题,包括质量参差不齐、可比性方面的挑战以及存在偏见的风险。在本文中,作者讨论了学术医学中 LOR 的独特优势、局限性和最佳实践建议。作者还讨论了未来的发展方向,包括人工智能的作用、非盲法和共同创建的 LOR。
Abstract: Letters of reference (LORs) are a common component of the application process for residency training programs. With the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 transitioning to pass/fail grading and with the increasing use of holistic review, the potential role of LORs is rising in importance. Among some key benefits are the ability to provide a broader and more holistic view of applicants, which can include highlighting elements of experiences or skills that could be missed in their application, as well as providing a third-party assessment of the applicant external to their rotation experiences. However, LORs also face issues, including variation in quality, challenges with comparability, and risk of bias. In this article, the authors discuss the unique benefits, limitations, and best practice recommendations for LORs in academic medicine. The authors also discuss future directions, including the role of artificial intelligence, unblinded, and co-created LORs.
期刊介绍:
Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.