执业护士的学位及其与时间利用、职能自主和工作成果的关系

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Outlook Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102193
Alex Hoyt PhD, RN , Jason Lucey DNP, FNP-BC , Susan Kelly-Weeder PhD, FNP-BC, FAANP, FAAN , Monica O'Reilly-Jacob PhD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAAN
{"title":"执业护士的学位及其与时间利用、职能自主和工作成果的关系","authors":"Alex Hoyt PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Jason Lucey DNP, FNP-BC ,&nbsp;Susan Kelly-Weeder PhD, FNP-BC, FAANP, FAAN ,&nbsp;Monica O'Reilly-Jacob PhD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAAN","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Doctorate of Nursing Practice preparation is recommended for entry to nurse practitioner (NP) practice but there are few comparative studies, and their designs conflate educational pathways.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes among NPs without a doctorate, NPs whose initial NP preparation and doctorate were separated by 2 or more years, and NPs whose NP preparation and doctorate were concurrent.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We selected all NPs from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, except those whose doctorates focused on research. We controlled for confounding and applied sample weights to produce nationally representative results.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>NPs' educational pathways are associated with distinct practice roles and, moving forward, policy should be informed by evidence that accounts for their differences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Concurrent NPs had higher levels of functional autonomy compared with NPs without a doctorate, but patterns of time use were essentially the same. Separate doctoral education was associated with teaching and administration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"72 4","pages":"Article 102193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse practitioners’ degrees and associations with time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Alex Hoyt PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Jason Lucey DNP, FNP-BC ,&nbsp;Susan Kelly-Weeder PhD, FNP-BC, FAANP, FAAN ,&nbsp;Monica O'Reilly-Jacob PhD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAAN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Doctorate of Nursing Practice preparation is recommended for entry to nurse practitioner (NP) practice but there are few comparative studies, and their designs conflate educational pathways.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes among NPs without a doctorate, NPs whose initial NP preparation and doctorate were separated by 2 or more years, and NPs whose NP preparation and doctorate were concurrent.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We selected all NPs from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, except those whose doctorates focused on research. We controlled for confounding and applied sample weights to produce nationally representative results.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>NPs' educational pathways are associated with distinct practice roles and, moving forward, policy should be informed by evidence that accounts for their differences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Concurrent NPs had higher levels of functional autonomy compared with NPs without a doctorate, but patterns of time use were essentially the same. Separate doctoral education was associated with teaching and administration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\"72 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424000861\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424000861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景护理实践博士准备被推荐用于执业护士(NP),但比较研究很少,而且其设计混淆了教育途径.Purpose To investigate time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes among NPs without a doctorate, NPs whose initial NP preparation and doctorate were apart by 2 or more years, and NPs whose NP preparation and doctorate were concurrent.MethodWe selected all NPs from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, except those whose doctorates focused on research.我们对混杂因素进行了控制,并应用样本加权得出了具有全国代表性的结果。讨论护士的教育途径与不同的实践角色相关联,因此,在制定政策时应参考能说明其差异的证据。结论与未获得博士学位的护士相比,同时获得博士学位的护士具有更高水平的职能自主权,但时间使用模式基本相同。单独的博士教育与教学和管理有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurse practitioners’ degrees and associations with time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes

Background

Doctorate of Nursing Practice preparation is recommended for entry to nurse practitioner (NP) practice but there are few comparative studies, and their designs conflate educational pathways.

Purpose

To investigate time use, functional autonomy, and job outcomes among NPs without a doctorate, NPs whose initial NP preparation and doctorate were separated by 2 or more years, and NPs whose NP preparation and doctorate were concurrent.

Method

We selected all NPs from the 2018 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, except those whose doctorates focused on research. We controlled for confounding and applied sample weights to produce nationally representative results.

Discussion

NPs' educational pathways are associated with distinct practice roles and, moving forward, policy should be informed by evidence that accounts for their differences.

Conclusion

Concurrent NPs had higher levels of functional autonomy compared with NPs without a doctorate, but patterns of time use were essentially the same. Separate doctoral education was associated with teaching and administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Outlook
Nursing Outlook 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.
期刊最新文献
Preparing the next generation of nurse leaders in education, science, and practice: Lessons from four Robert Wood Johnson Foundation programs. A content analysis defining research-focused faculty research success. Using an organizational framework to drive change in nursing education: An action plan for nurse leaders. State of Black men in nursing: An oral history of the challenges and the benefits of five Black male nurse leaders An evaluation of a student-led nursing leadership symposium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1