高风险手术患者术后重症监护分配与死亡率:来自中低收入国家队列的证据。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844517
Adriene Stahlschmidt , Sávio Cavalcante Passos , Guilherme Roloff Cardoso , Gabriela Jungblut Schuh , Paulo Corrêa da Silva Neto , Stela Maris de Jezus Castro , Luciana Cadore Stefani
{"title":"高风险手术患者术后重症监护分配与死亡率:来自中低收入国家队列的证据。","authors":"Adriene Stahlschmidt ,&nbsp;Sávio Cavalcante Passos ,&nbsp;Guilherme Roloff Cardoso ,&nbsp;Gabriela Jungblut Schuh ,&nbsp;Paulo Corrêa da Silva Neto ,&nbsp;Stela Maris de Jezus Castro ,&nbsp;Luciana Cadore Stefani","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The escalation of surgeries for high-risk patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) lacks evidence on the positive impact of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and lacks universal criteria for allocation. This study explores the link between postoperative ICU allocation and mortality in high-risk patients within a LMIC. Additionally, it assesses the Ex-Care risk model's utility in guiding postoperative allocation decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A secondary analysis was conducted in a cohort of high-risk surgical patients from a 800-bed university-affiliated teaching hospital in Southern Brazil (July 2017 to January 2020). Inclusion criteria encompassed 1431 inpatients with Ex-Care Model-assessed all-cause postoperative 30-day mortality risk exceeding 5%. The study compared 30-day mortality outcomes between those allocated to the ICU and the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU). Outcomes were also assessed based on Ex-Care risk model classes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1431 high-risk patients, 250 (17.47%) were directed to the ICU, resulting in 28% in-hospital 30-day mortality, compared to 8.9% in the PACU. However, ICU allocation showed no independent effect on mortality (RR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.68‒1.20). Patients in the highest Ex-Care risk class (Class IV) exhibited a substantial association with mortality (RR = 2.11; 95% CI 1.54–2.90) and were more frequently admitted to the ICU (23.3% vs. 13.1%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients in the highest Ex-Care risk class and those with complications faced elevated mortality risk, irrespective of allocation. Addressing the unmet need for adaptable postoperative care for high-risk patients outside the ICU is crucial in LMICs. Further research is essential to refine criteria and elucidate the utility of risk assessment tools like the Ex-Care model in assisting allocation decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000393/pdfft?md5=ff56b792c16c1173127caf180eb53baa&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001424000393-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative intensive care allocation and mortality in high-risk surgical patients: evidence from a low- and middle-income country cohort\",\"authors\":\"Adriene Stahlschmidt ,&nbsp;Sávio Cavalcante Passos ,&nbsp;Guilherme Roloff Cardoso ,&nbsp;Gabriela Jungblut Schuh ,&nbsp;Paulo Corrêa da Silva Neto ,&nbsp;Stela Maris de Jezus Castro ,&nbsp;Luciana Cadore Stefani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The escalation of surgeries for high-risk patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) lacks evidence on the positive impact of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and lacks universal criteria for allocation. This study explores the link between postoperative ICU allocation and mortality in high-risk patients within a LMIC. Additionally, it assesses the Ex-Care risk model's utility in guiding postoperative allocation decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A secondary analysis was conducted in a cohort of high-risk surgical patients from a 800-bed university-affiliated teaching hospital in Southern Brazil (July 2017 to January 2020). Inclusion criteria encompassed 1431 inpatients with Ex-Care Model-assessed all-cause postoperative 30-day mortality risk exceeding 5%. The study compared 30-day mortality outcomes between those allocated to the ICU and the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU). Outcomes were also assessed based on Ex-Care risk model classes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1431 high-risk patients, 250 (17.47%) were directed to the ICU, resulting in 28% in-hospital 30-day mortality, compared to 8.9% in the PACU. However, ICU allocation showed no independent effect on mortality (RR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.68‒1.20). Patients in the highest Ex-Care risk class (Class IV) exhibited a substantial association with mortality (RR = 2.11; 95% CI 1.54–2.90) and were more frequently admitted to the ICU (23.3% vs. 13.1%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients in the highest Ex-Care risk class and those with complications faced elevated mortality risk, irrespective of allocation. Addressing the unmet need for adaptable postoperative care for high-risk patients outside the ICU is crucial in LMICs. Further research is essential to refine criteria and elucidate the utility of risk assessment tools like the Ex-Care model in assisting allocation decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000393/pdfft?md5=ff56b792c16c1173127caf180eb53baa&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001424000393-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000393\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在中低收入国家(LMICs),高危患者手术的升级缺乏重症监护病房(ICU)入院积极影响的证据,也缺乏分配的通用标准。本研究探讨了中低收入国家高危患者术后入住重症监护室与死亡率之间的关系。此外,研究还评估了 Ex-Care 风险模型在指导术后分配决策方面的实用性:对巴西南部一家拥有 800 张床位的大学附属教学医院的高风险手术患者队列进行了二次分析(2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月)。纳入标准包括1431名经Ex-Care模型评估全因术后30天死亡风险超过5%的住院患者。研究比较了被分配到重症监护室和麻醉后护理病房(PACU)的患者的 30 天死亡率结果。研究还根据 Ex-Care 风险模型的等级对结果进行了评估:在 1431 名高风险患者中,有 250 人(17.47%)被分配到重症监护室,院内 30 天死亡率为 28%,而 PACU 为 8.9%。但是,重症监护室的分配对死亡率没有独立影响(RR = 0.91;95% CI 0.68-1.20)。最高护理风险等级(IV级)的患者与死亡率有很大关系(RR = 2.11; 95% CI 1.54-2.90),并且更常入住重症监护室(23.3% 对 13.1%):结论:无论分配方式如何,最高护理风险等级的患者和有并发症的患者都面临着更高的死亡风险。在低收入国家,解决高风险患者在重症监护室外的术后护理需求至关重要。进一步的研究对完善标准和阐明风险评估工具(如 Ex-Care 模型)在协助分配决策方面的效用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative intensive care allocation and mortality in high-risk surgical patients: evidence from a low- and middle-income country cohort

Background

The escalation of surgeries for high-risk patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) lacks evidence on the positive impact of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and lacks universal criteria for allocation. This study explores the link between postoperative ICU allocation and mortality in high-risk patients within a LMIC. Additionally, it assesses the Ex-Care risk model's utility in guiding postoperative allocation decisions.

Methods

A secondary analysis was conducted in a cohort of high-risk surgical patients from a 800-bed university-affiliated teaching hospital in Southern Brazil (July 2017 to January 2020). Inclusion criteria encompassed 1431 inpatients with Ex-Care Model-assessed all-cause postoperative 30-day mortality risk exceeding 5%. The study compared 30-day mortality outcomes between those allocated to the ICU and the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU). Outcomes were also assessed based on Ex-Care risk model classes.

Results

Among 1431 high-risk patients, 250 (17.47%) were directed to the ICU, resulting in 28% in-hospital 30-day mortality, compared to 8.9% in the PACU. However, ICU allocation showed no independent effect on mortality (RR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.68‒1.20). Patients in the highest Ex-Care risk class (Class IV) exhibited a substantial association with mortality (RR = 2.11; 95% CI 1.54–2.90) and were more frequently admitted to the ICU (23.3% vs. 13.1%).

Conclusion

Patients in the highest Ex-Care risk class and those with complications faced elevated mortality risk, irrespective of allocation. Addressing the unmet need for adaptable postoperative care for high-risk patients outside the ICU is crucial in LMICs. Further research is essential to refine criteria and elucidate the utility of risk assessment tools like the Ex-Care model in assisting allocation decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of superior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index in liver transplantation: a prospective observational study The debate on antifibrinolytics in liver transplantation: always, never, or sometimes? Comparison of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative delirium in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study The efficacy of buprenorphine compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1