Ailo Aasen , Vegard G. Jervell , Morten Hammer , Bjørn A. Strøm , Hans L. Skarsvåg , Øivind Wilhelmsen
{"title":"氨、水及其混合物的块体和界面热力学","authors":"Ailo Aasen , Vegard G. Jervell , Morten Hammer , Bjørn A. Strøm , Hans L. Skarsvåg , Øivind Wilhelmsen","doi":"10.1016/j.fluid.2024.114125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ammonia is a promising energy carrier for the green transition, but its hygroscopicity and toxicity necessitate in-depth understanding of its interaction with water. This work examines the bulk and interfacial thermodynamics of the ammonia–water system. Parameters for three equations of state are fitted to experimental data and compared to parameters from literature: PC-SAFT, Cubic Plus Association and Peng–Robinson. Peng–Robinson stands out as most accurate for bulk thermodynamics. Introducing a temperature-dependent volume shift for water with Peng–Robinson yields a highly accurate model without introducing problematic inconsistencies, with errors of 0.05% for saturation pressures, and 0.5% for liquid densities. For the mixture, Peng–Robinson with a two-parameter Huron–Vidal mixing rule reproduces measurements mostly within their uncertainties, whereas the standard mixing rules for PC-SAFT and CPA are less accurate. A literature review of surface tension measurements of ammonia–water mixtures reveals that accurate measurements exist only at ambient temperature. We apply density gradient theory and density functional theory based on PC-SAFT, finding that both models fail at reproducing qualitative features of the surface tensions and adsorptions of dilute solutions of aqueous ammonia. Whereas bulk properties are well characterized, understanding and describing the interfacial thermodynamics of the ammonia–water system demands more work both on the experimental and modeling side.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12170,"journal":{"name":"Fluid Phase Equilibria","volume":"584 ","pages":"Article 114125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037838122400102X/pdfft?md5=91fc913f81683fa79c0d0d562eef7e52&pid=1-s2.0-S037838122400102X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bulk and interfacial thermodynamics of ammonia, water and their mixtures\",\"authors\":\"Ailo Aasen , Vegard G. Jervell , Morten Hammer , Bjørn A. Strøm , Hans L. Skarsvåg , Øivind Wilhelmsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fluid.2024.114125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ammonia is a promising energy carrier for the green transition, but its hygroscopicity and toxicity necessitate in-depth understanding of its interaction with water. This work examines the bulk and interfacial thermodynamics of the ammonia–water system. Parameters for three equations of state are fitted to experimental data and compared to parameters from literature: PC-SAFT, Cubic Plus Association and Peng–Robinson. Peng–Robinson stands out as most accurate for bulk thermodynamics. Introducing a temperature-dependent volume shift for water with Peng–Robinson yields a highly accurate model without introducing problematic inconsistencies, with errors of 0.05% for saturation pressures, and 0.5% for liquid densities. For the mixture, Peng–Robinson with a two-parameter Huron–Vidal mixing rule reproduces measurements mostly within their uncertainties, whereas the standard mixing rules for PC-SAFT and CPA are less accurate. A literature review of surface tension measurements of ammonia–water mixtures reveals that accurate measurements exist only at ambient temperature. We apply density gradient theory and density functional theory based on PC-SAFT, finding that both models fail at reproducing qualitative features of the surface tensions and adsorptions of dilute solutions of aqueous ammonia. Whereas bulk properties are well characterized, understanding and describing the interfacial thermodynamics of the ammonia–water system demands more work both on the experimental and modeling side.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fluid Phase Equilibria\",\"volume\":\"584 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037838122400102X/pdfft?md5=91fc913f81683fa79c0d0d562eef7e52&pid=1-s2.0-S037838122400102X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fluid Phase Equilibria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037838122400102X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluid Phase Equilibria","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037838122400102X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
氨是一种有希望实现绿色转型的能量载体,但由于其吸湿性和毒性,有必要深入了解其与水的相互作用。这项研究探讨了氨水系统的体热动力学和界面热力学。根据实验数据拟合了三个状态方程的参数,并与文献中的参数进行了比较:PC-SAFT、Cubic Plus Association 和 Peng-Robinson。彭-罗宾逊方程是最准确的体热动力学方程。在彭-罗宾逊模型中引入与温度相关的水体积偏移,可以得到一个高度精确的模型,而不会产生不一致的问题,饱和压力误差为 0.05%,液体密度误差为 0.5%。对于混合物,Peng-Robinson 与双参数 Huron-Vidal 混合规则重现的测量结果大多在不确定范围内,而 PC-SAFT 和 CPA 的标准混合规则则不太准确。有关氨水混合物表面张力测量的文献综述显示,只有在环境温度下才能获得精确的测量结果。我们应用了基于 PC-SAFT 的密度梯度理论和密度泛函理论,发现这两种模型都无法再现氨水稀溶液表面张力和吸附力的定性特征。虽然氨水体系的主体特性已得到很好的描述,但要理解和描述氨水体系的界面热力学,还需要在实验和建模方面做更多的工作。
Bulk and interfacial thermodynamics of ammonia, water and their mixtures
Ammonia is a promising energy carrier for the green transition, but its hygroscopicity and toxicity necessitate in-depth understanding of its interaction with water. This work examines the bulk and interfacial thermodynamics of the ammonia–water system. Parameters for three equations of state are fitted to experimental data and compared to parameters from literature: PC-SAFT, Cubic Plus Association and Peng–Robinson. Peng–Robinson stands out as most accurate for bulk thermodynamics. Introducing a temperature-dependent volume shift for water with Peng–Robinson yields a highly accurate model without introducing problematic inconsistencies, with errors of 0.05% for saturation pressures, and 0.5% for liquid densities. For the mixture, Peng–Robinson with a two-parameter Huron–Vidal mixing rule reproduces measurements mostly within their uncertainties, whereas the standard mixing rules for PC-SAFT and CPA are less accurate. A literature review of surface tension measurements of ammonia–water mixtures reveals that accurate measurements exist only at ambient temperature. We apply density gradient theory and density functional theory based on PC-SAFT, finding that both models fail at reproducing qualitative features of the surface tensions and adsorptions of dilute solutions of aqueous ammonia. Whereas bulk properties are well characterized, understanding and describing the interfacial thermodynamics of the ammonia–water system demands more work both on the experimental and modeling side.
期刊介绍:
Fluid Phase Equilibria publishes high-quality papers dealing with experimental, theoretical, and applied research related to equilibrium and transport properties of fluids, solids, and interfaces. Subjects of interest include physical/phase and chemical equilibria; equilibrium and nonequilibrium thermophysical properties; fundamental thermodynamic relations; and stability. The systems central to the journal include pure substances and mixtures of organic and inorganic materials, including polymers, biochemicals, and surfactants with sufficient characterization of composition and purity for the results to be reproduced. Alloys are of interest only when thermodynamic studies are included, purely material studies will not be considered. In all cases, authors are expected to provide physical or chemical interpretations of the results.
Experimental research can include measurements under all conditions of temperature, pressure, and composition, including critical and supercritical. Measurements are to be associated with systems and conditions of fundamental or applied interest, and may not be only a collection of routine data, such as physical property or solubility measurements at limited pressures and temperatures close to ambient, or surfactant studies focussed strictly on micellisation or micelle structure. Papers reporting common data must be accompanied by new physical insights and/or contemporary or new theory or techniques.