牙科植入物直径和锥形体设计对插入过程中硬质聚氨酯泡沫应力分布的影响

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Engineering & Physics Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104181
Baixuan Yang , Ainara Irastorza Landa , Peter Heuberger , Heidi-Lynn Ploeg
{"title":"牙科植入物直径和锥形体设计对插入过程中硬质聚氨酯泡沫应力分布的影响","authors":"Baixuan Yang ,&nbsp;Ainara Irastorza Landa ,&nbsp;Peter Heuberger ,&nbsp;Heidi-Lynn Ploeg","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Anchorage, evaluated by the maximum insertion torque (IT), refers to mechanical engagement between dental implant and host bone at the time of insertion without external loads. Sufficient anchorage has been highly recommended in the clinic. In several studies, the effects of implant diameter and taper body design under external loading have been evaluated after insertion; however, there are few studies, in which their effects on stress distribution during insertion have been investigated to understand establishment of anchorage. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of dental implant diameter and tapered body design on anchorage combining experiments, analytical modeling, and finite element analysis (FEA). Two implant designs (parallel-walled and tapered) with two implant diameters were inserted into rigid polyurethane (PU) foam with corresponding straight drill protocols. The IT was fit to the analytical model (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.88–1.0). The insertion process was modeled using explicit FEA. For parallel-walled implants, normalized IT and final FEA contact ratio were not related to the implant diameter while the implant diameter affected normalized IT (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.90, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05, β<sub>1</sub> = 0.20 and β<sub>2</sub> = 0.93, standardized regression coefficients for implant diameter and taper body design) and final FEA contact ratio of tapered implants. The taper design distributed the PU foam stress further away from the thread compared to parallel-walled implants, which demonstrated compression in PU foam established by the tapered body during insertion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324000821/pdfft?md5=de8c3061da9618b8aaf9f204b616bf93&pid=1-s2.0-S1350453324000821-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of dental implant diameter and tapered body design on stress distribution in rigid polyurethane foam during insertion\",\"authors\":\"Baixuan Yang ,&nbsp;Ainara Irastorza Landa ,&nbsp;Peter Heuberger ,&nbsp;Heidi-Lynn Ploeg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Anchorage, evaluated by the maximum insertion torque (IT), refers to mechanical engagement between dental implant and host bone at the time of insertion without external loads. Sufficient anchorage has been highly recommended in the clinic. In several studies, the effects of implant diameter and taper body design under external loading have been evaluated after insertion; however, there are few studies, in which their effects on stress distribution during insertion have been investigated to understand establishment of anchorage. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of dental implant diameter and tapered body design on anchorage combining experiments, analytical modeling, and finite element analysis (FEA). Two implant designs (parallel-walled and tapered) with two implant diameters were inserted into rigid polyurethane (PU) foam with corresponding straight drill protocols. The IT was fit to the analytical model (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.88–1.0). The insertion process was modeled using explicit FEA. For parallel-walled implants, normalized IT and final FEA contact ratio were not related to the implant diameter while the implant diameter affected normalized IT (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.90, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05, β<sub>1</sub> = 0.20 and β<sub>2</sub> = 0.93, standardized regression coefficients for implant diameter and taper body design) and final FEA contact ratio of tapered implants. The taper design distributed the PU foam stress further away from the thread compared to parallel-walled implants, which demonstrated compression in PU foam established by the tapered body during insertion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324000821/pdfft?md5=de8c3061da9618b8aaf9f204b616bf93&pid=1-s2.0-S1350453324000821-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324000821\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324000821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以最大插入扭矩(IT)来评估的锚固度是指牙科种植体在插入时与主骨之间在无外部负荷的情况下的机械啮合。足够的锚固性在临床上一直备受推崇。在一些研究中,已经评估了种植体直径和锥体设计在插入后外部负荷下的影响;但很少有研究调查它们在插入过程中对应力分布的影响,以了解锚定的建立情况。因此,本研究的目的是结合实验、分析建模和有限元分析(FEA),研究牙科种植体直径和锥体设计对锚固的影响。将两种直径的种植体(平行壁和锥形)植入硬质聚氨酯(PU)泡沫中,并采用相应的直钻方案。IT 与分析模型进行了拟合(R2 = 0.88-1.0)。插入过程采用显式有限元分析建模。对于平行壁种植体,归一化 IT 和最终有限元分析接触比与种植体直径无关,而种植体直径会影响锥形种植体的归一化 IT(R2 = 0.90,p < 0.05,β1 = 0.20 和 β2 = 0.93,种植体直径和锥体设计的标准化回归系数)和最终有限元分析接触比。与平行壁种植体相比,锥形设计使聚氨酯泡沫的应力分布更远离螺纹,这表明锥形体在插入过程中对聚氨酯泡沫产生了压缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of dental implant diameter and tapered body design on stress distribution in rigid polyurethane foam during insertion

Anchorage, evaluated by the maximum insertion torque (IT), refers to mechanical engagement between dental implant and host bone at the time of insertion without external loads. Sufficient anchorage has been highly recommended in the clinic. In several studies, the effects of implant diameter and taper body design under external loading have been evaluated after insertion; however, there are few studies, in which their effects on stress distribution during insertion have been investigated to understand establishment of anchorage. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of dental implant diameter and tapered body design on anchorage combining experiments, analytical modeling, and finite element analysis (FEA). Two implant designs (parallel-walled and tapered) with two implant diameters were inserted into rigid polyurethane (PU) foam with corresponding straight drill protocols. The IT was fit to the analytical model (R2 = 0.88–1.0). The insertion process was modeled using explicit FEA. For parallel-walled implants, normalized IT and final FEA contact ratio were not related to the implant diameter while the implant diameter affected normalized IT (R2 = 0.90, p < 0.05, β1 = 0.20 and β2 = 0.93, standardized regression coefficients for implant diameter and taper body design) and final FEA contact ratio of tapered implants. The taper design distributed the PU foam stress further away from the thread compared to parallel-walled implants, which demonstrated compression in PU foam established by the tapered body during insertion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) using echo amplitudes of the therapeutic focused transducer 3D bioheat transfer mapping reveals nanomagnetic particles effectiveness in radiofrequency hyperthermia breast cancer treatment comparing to experimental study Bone ingrowth in randomly distributed porous interbody cage during lumbar spinal fusion A method of nucleus image segmentation and counting based on TC-UNet++ and distance watershed Integrated analysis of clinical indicators and mechanical properties in cancellous bone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1