药物治疗和心理治疗对强迫症患者大脑活动的共同影响和特定影响

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1155/2024/6687657
Anouk van der Straten, Willem Bruin, Laurens van de Mortel, Freek ten Doesschate, Maarten J. M. Merkx, Pelle de Koning, Nienke Vulink, Martijn Figee, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Damiaan Denys, Guido van Wingen
{"title":"药物治疗和心理治疗对强迫症患者大脑活动的共同影响和特定影响","authors":"Anouk van der Straten,&nbsp;Willem Bruin,&nbsp;Laurens van de Mortel,&nbsp;Freek ten Doesschate,&nbsp;Maarten J. M. Merkx,&nbsp;Pelle de Koning,&nbsp;Nienke Vulink,&nbsp;Martijn Figee,&nbsp;Odile A. van den Heuvel,&nbsp;Damiaan Denys,&nbsp;Guido van Wingen","doi":"10.1155/2024/6687657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Initial treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) consists of pharmacological treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and/or psychological treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The assumption is that both treatments have different neural working mechanisms, but empirical evidence is lacking. We investigated whether these treatments induce similar or different functional neural changes in OCD. We conducted a longitudinal nonrandomized controlled trial in which thirty-four OCD patients were treated with sixteen weeks of CBT or SSRIs. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after treatment during emotional processing (emotional face matching and symptom provocation tasks) and response inhibition (stop signal task). Twenty matched healthy controls were scanned twice with a similar time interval. Both CBT and SSRIs were successful in reducing OCD symptoms. Compared to healthy controls, treatment led to a reduction of insula activity in OCD patients during symptom provocation. The comparison between treatment groups revealed widespread divergent brain changes in the cerebellum, posterior insula, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, and occipital and prefrontal cortex during all tasks, explained by relative increases of activity following CBT compared to relative decreases of activity following SSRIs. Pharmacological and psychological treatment primarily lead to opposite changes in brain function, with a common reduction of insula activity during symptom provocation. These findings provide insight into common and specific neural mechanisms underlying treatment response, suggesting that CBT and SSRIs support recovery from OCD along partly distinct pathways. This trial is registered with NTR6575.</p>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological and Psychological Treatment Have Common and Specific Effects on Brain Activity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder\",\"authors\":\"Anouk van der Straten,&nbsp;Willem Bruin,&nbsp;Laurens van de Mortel,&nbsp;Freek ten Doesschate,&nbsp;Maarten J. M. Merkx,&nbsp;Pelle de Koning,&nbsp;Nienke Vulink,&nbsp;Martijn Figee,&nbsp;Odile A. van den Heuvel,&nbsp;Damiaan Denys,&nbsp;Guido van Wingen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/6687657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Initial treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) consists of pharmacological treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and/or psychological treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The assumption is that both treatments have different neural working mechanisms, but empirical evidence is lacking. We investigated whether these treatments induce similar or different functional neural changes in OCD. We conducted a longitudinal nonrandomized controlled trial in which thirty-four OCD patients were treated with sixteen weeks of CBT or SSRIs. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after treatment during emotional processing (emotional face matching and symptom provocation tasks) and response inhibition (stop signal task). Twenty matched healthy controls were scanned twice with a similar time interval. Both CBT and SSRIs were successful in reducing OCD symptoms. Compared to healthy controls, treatment led to a reduction of insula activity in OCD patients during symptom provocation. The comparison between treatment groups revealed widespread divergent brain changes in the cerebellum, posterior insula, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, and occipital and prefrontal cortex during all tasks, explained by relative increases of activity following CBT compared to relative decreases of activity following SSRIs. Pharmacological and psychological treatment primarily lead to opposite changes in brain function, with a common reduction of insula activity during symptom provocation. These findings provide insight into common and specific neural mechanisms underlying treatment response, suggesting that CBT and SSRIs support recovery from OCD along partly distinct pathways. This trial is registered with NTR6575.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6687657\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6687657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强迫症(OCD)的初始治疗包括选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的药物治疗和/或认知行为疗法(CBT)的心理治疗。我们假设这两种治疗方法具有不同的神经工作机制,但缺乏实证证据。我们研究了这些治疗方法是否会诱发强迫症患者发生类似或不同的功能性神经变化。我们进行了一项纵向非随机对照试验,对 34 名强迫症患者进行了为期 16 周的 CBT 或 SSRIs 治疗。在治疗前后,我们对患者的情绪处理(情绪面孔匹配和症状激惹任务)和反应抑制(停止信号任务)进行了功能磁共振成像。对 20 名匹配的健康对照者进行了两次扫描,时间间隔相似。CBT 和 SSRIs 都能成功减轻强迫症症状。与健康对照组相比,治疗导致强迫症患者在症状激发时脑岛活动减少。治疗组之间的比较显示,在所有任务中,小脑、后岛叶、尾状核、海马、枕叶和前额叶皮层都出现了广泛的不同脑变化,这是因为采用 CBT 治疗后活动相对增加,而采用 SSRI 治疗后活动相对减少。药物治疗和心理治疗主要导致大脑功能发生相反的变化,在症状激发时,脑岛活动普遍减少。这些发现深入揭示了治疗反应的共同和特定神经机制,表明 CBT 和 SSRIs 可通过部分不同的途径帮助强迫症患者康复。该试验已注册为 NTR6575。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacological and Psychological Treatment Have Common and Specific Effects on Brain Activity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Initial treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) consists of pharmacological treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and/or psychological treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The assumption is that both treatments have different neural working mechanisms, but empirical evidence is lacking. We investigated whether these treatments induce similar or different functional neural changes in OCD. We conducted a longitudinal nonrandomized controlled trial in which thirty-four OCD patients were treated with sixteen weeks of CBT or SSRIs. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after treatment during emotional processing (emotional face matching and symptom provocation tasks) and response inhibition (stop signal task). Twenty matched healthy controls were scanned twice with a similar time interval. Both CBT and SSRIs were successful in reducing OCD symptoms. Compared to healthy controls, treatment led to a reduction of insula activity in OCD patients during symptom provocation. The comparison between treatment groups revealed widespread divergent brain changes in the cerebellum, posterior insula, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, and occipital and prefrontal cortex during all tasks, explained by relative increases of activity following CBT compared to relative decreases of activity following SSRIs. Pharmacological and psychological treatment primarily lead to opposite changes in brain function, with a common reduction of insula activity during symptom provocation. These findings provide insight into common and specific neural mechanisms underlying treatment response, suggesting that CBT and SSRIs support recovery from OCD along partly distinct pathways. This trial is registered with NTR6575.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
The Bridge Symptoms of Work–Family Conflict, Sleep Disorder, and Job Burnout: A Network Analysis Resolving Heterogeneity in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Using Individualized Structural Covariance Network Analysis Relationship Between BMI, Self-Rated Depression, and Food Addiction—A Cross-Sectional Study of Adults in Postpandemic Poland Precariousness Represents an Independent Risk Factor for Depression in Children With Sickle Cell Disease Exploring the Association Between Residual Mood Symptoms and Self-Reported Side Effects in the Euthymic Phase of Bipolar Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1