Anouk van der Straten, Willem Bruin, Laurens van de Mortel, Freek ten Doesschate, Maarten J. M. Merkx, Pelle de Koning, Nienke Vulink, Martijn Figee, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Damiaan Denys, Guido van Wingen
{"title":"药物治疗和心理治疗对强迫症患者大脑活动的共同影响和特定影响","authors":"Anouk van der Straten, Willem Bruin, Laurens van de Mortel, Freek ten Doesschate, Maarten J. M. Merkx, Pelle de Koning, Nienke Vulink, Martijn Figee, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Damiaan Denys, Guido van Wingen","doi":"10.1155/2024/6687657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Initial treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) consists of pharmacological treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and/or psychological treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The assumption is that both treatments have different neural working mechanisms, but empirical evidence is lacking. We investigated whether these treatments induce similar or different functional neural changes in OCD. We conducted a longitudinal nonrandomized controlled trial in which thirty-four OCD patients were treated with sixteen weeks of CBT or SSRIs. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after treatment during emotional processing (emotional face matching and symptom provocation tasks) and response inhibition (stop signal task). Twenty matched healthy controls were scanned twice with a similar time interval. Both CBT and SSRIs were successful in reducing OCD symptoms. Compared to healthy controls, treatment led to a reduction of insula activity in OCD patients during symptom provocation. The comparison between treatment groups revealed widespread divergent brain changes in the cerebellum, posterior insula, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, and occipital and prefrontal cortex during all tasks, explained by relative increases of activity following CBT compared to relative decreases of activity following SSRIs. Pharmacological and psychological treatment primarily lead to opposite changes in brain function, with a common reduction of insula activity during symptom provocation. These findings provide insight into common and specific neural mechanisms underlying treatment response, suggesting that CBT and SSRIs support recovery from OCD along partly distinct pathways. This trial is registered with NTR6575.</p>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological and Psychological Treatment Have Common and Specific Effects on Brain Activity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder\",\"authors\":\"Anouk van der Straten, Willem Bruin, Laurens van de Mortel, Freek ten Doesschate, Maarten J. M. Merkx, Pelle de Koning, Nienke Vulink, Martijn Figee, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Damiaan Denys, Guido van Wingen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/6687657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Initial treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) consists of pharmacological treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and/or psychological treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The assumption is that both treatments have different neural working mechanisms, but empirical evidence is lacking. We investigated whether these treatments induce similar or different functional neural changes in OCD. We conducted a longitudinal nonrandomized controlled trial in which thirty-four OCD patients were treated with sixteen weeks of CBT or SSRIs. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after treatment during emotional processing (emotional face matching and symptom provocation tasks) and response inhibition (stop signal task). Twenty matched healthy controls were scanned twice with a similar time interval. Both CBT and SSRIs were successful in reducing OCD symptoms. Compared to healthy controls, treatment led to a reduction of insula activity in OCD patients during symptom provocation. The comparison between treatment groups revealed widespread divergent brain changes in the cerebellum, posterior insula, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, and occipital and prefrontal cortex during all tasks, explained by relative increases of activity following CBT compared to relative decreases of activity following SSRIs. Pharmacological and psychological treatment primarily lead to opposite changes in brain function, with a common reduction of insula activity during symptom provocation. These findings provide insight into common and specific neural mechanisms underlying treatment response, suggesting that CBT and SSRIs support recovery from OCD along partly distinct pathways. This trial is registered with NTR6575.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6687657\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6687657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacological and Psychological Treatment Have Common and Specific Effects on Brain Activity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Initial treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) consists of pharmacological treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and/or psychological treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The assumption is that both treatments have different neural working mechanisms, but empirical evidence is lacking. We investigated whether these treatments induce similar or different functional neural changes in OCD. We conducted a longitudinal nonrandomized controlled trial in which thirty-four OCD patients were treated with sixteen weeks of CBT or SSRIs. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after treatment during emotional processing (emotional face matching and symptom provocation tasks) and response inhibition (stop signal task). Twenty matched healthy controls were scanned twice with a similar time interval. Both CBT and SSRIs were successful in reducing OCD symptoms. Compared to healthy controls, treatment led to a reduction of insula activity in OCD patients during symptom provocation. The comparison between treatment groups revealed widespread divergent brain changes in the cerebellum, posterior insula, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, and occipital and prefrontal cortex during all tasks, explained by relative increases of activity following CBT compared to relative decreases of activity following SSRIs. Pharmacological and psychological treatment primarily lead to opposite changes in brain function, with a common reduction of insula activity during symptom provocation. These findings provide insight into common and specific neural mechanisms underlying treatment response, suggesting that CBT and SSRIs support recovery from OCD along partly distinct pathways. This trial is registered with NTR6575.
期刊介绍:
Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.