COVID-19与亲诊与远程医疗初级保健就诊率的关系,以及随后对烟草使用评估和戒烟援助转诊的影响。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae126
Susan A Flocke, Elizabeth L Albert, Steven A Lewis, Eileen L Seeholzer, Steffani R Bailey
{"title":"COVID-19与亲诊与远程医疗初级保健就诊率的关系,以及随后对烟草使用评估和戒烟援助转诊的影响。","authors":"Susan A Flocke, Elizabeth L Albert, Steven A Lewis, Eileen L Seeholzer, Steffani R Bailey","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered patterns of healthcare delivery. Smoking remains an important risk factor for multiple chronic conditions and may exacerbate more severe symptoms of COVID-19. Thus, it is important to understand how pandemic-induced changes in primary care practice patterns affected smoking assessment and cessation assistance.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Electronic health record data from eight community health centers were examined from March 1, 2019 to February 28, 2022. Data include both telehealth (phone and video) and in-person office visits and represent 310 388 visits by adult patients. Rates of smoking assessment, provision of referral to counseling, and orders for smoking cessation medications were calculated. Comparisons by visit mode and time period were examined using generalized estimating equations and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of telehealth visits was < 0.1% 1 year prior to COVID-19 onset and, 54.5% and 34.1% 1 and 2 years after. The odds of asking about smoking status and offering a referral to smoking cessation counseling were significantly higher during in-person versus telehealth visits; adjusted odds ratios (AOR) (95% CI) = 15.0 (14.7 to 15.4) and AOR (95% CI) = 6.5 (3.0 to 13.9), respectively. The interaction effect of visit type * time period was significant for ordering smoking cessation medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth visits were significantly less likely to include smoking status assessment and referral to smoking cessation counseling compared to in-person visits. Given that smoking assessment and cessation assistance do not require face-to-face interactions with health care providers, continued efforts are needed to ensure provision at all visits, regardless of modality.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered patterns of healthcare-seeking and delivery with a considerable rise in telehealth visits. This study examined 1 year prior to the onset of COVID-19 and 2 years after to evaluate the assessment of tobacco use and assistance with tobacco cessation and differences during in-person versus telehealth visits. Tobacco assessment was 15 times more likely during in-person versus telehealth visits in the 2 years post onset of COVID-19. Given that telehealth visits are likely to continue, ensuring that patients are regularly assessed for tobacco regardless of visit modality is an important concern for health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of COVID-19 and the Prevalence of In-person Versus Telehealth Primary Care Visits and Subsequent Impacts on Tobacco Use Assessment and Referral for Cessation Assistance.\",\"authors\":\"Susan A Flocke, Elizabeth L Albert, Steven A Lewis, Eileen L Seeholzer, Steffani R Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered patterns of healthcare delivery. Smoking remains an important risk factor for multiple chronic conditions and may exacerbate more severe symptoms of COVID-19. Thus, it is important to understand how pandemic-induced changes in primary care practice patterns affected smoking assessment and cessation assistance.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Electronic health record data from eight community health centers were examined from March 1, 2019 to February 28, 2022. Data include both telehealth (phone and video) and in-person office visits and represent 310 388 visits by adult patients. Rates of smoking assessment, provision of referral to counseling, and orders for smoking cessation medications were calculated. Comparisons by visit mode and time period were examined using generalized estimating equations and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of telehealth visits was < 0.1% 1 year prior to COVID-19 onset and, 54.5% and 34.1% 1 and 2 years after. The odds of asking about smoking status and offering a referral to smoking cessation counseling were significantly higher during in-person versus telehealth visits; adjusted odds ratios (AOR) (95% CI) = 15.0 (14.7 to 15.4) and AOR (95% CI) = 6.5 (3.0 to 13.9), respectively. The interaction effect of visit type * time period was significant for ordering smoking cessation medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth visits were significantly less likely to include smoking status assessment and referral to smoking cessation counseling compared to in-person visits. Given that smoking assessment and cessation assistance do not require face-to-face interactions with health care providers, continued efforts are needed to ensure provision at all visits, regardless of modality.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered patterns of healthcare-seeking and delivery with a considerable rise in telehealth visits. This study examined 1 year prior to the onset of COVID-19 and 2 years after to evaluate the assessment of tobacco use and assistance with tobacco cessation and differences during in-person versus telehealth visits. Tobacco assessment was 15 times more likely during in-person versus telehealth visits in the 2 years post onset of COVID-19. Given that telehealth visits are likely to continue, ensuring that patients are regularly assessed for tobacco regardless of visit modality is an important concern for health systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae126\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:COVID-19 大流行极大地改变了医疗保健服务的提供模式。吸烟仍是多种慢性疾病的重要风险因素,并可能加重 COVID-19 的严重症状。因此,了解大流行引起的初级医疗实践模式的变化如何影响吸烟评估和戒烟援助非常重要:方法:研究了 8 个社区卫生中心从 2019 年 3 月 1 日到 2022 年 2 月 28 日的电子健康记录(EHR)数据。数据包括远程医疗(电话和视频)和面对面诊疗,代表了成年患者的 310,388 次就诊。计算了吸烟评估率、咨询转诊率和戒烟药物订购率。使用广义估计方程和逻辑回归对不同就诊方式和时间段进行了比较:结果:远程医疗就诊的比例为 结论:远程医疗就诊的比例明显低于传统就诊:与面对面就诊相比,远程医疗就诊中包含吸烟状况评估和戒烟咨询转介的可能性要低得多。鉴于吸烟评估和戒烟援助不需要与医疗服务提供者进行面对面的交流,因此需要继续努力确保在所有就诊中提供此类服务,无论采用哪种方式:COVID-19大流行极大地改变了医疗服务的寻求和提供模式,远程医疗就诊率大幅上升。本研究对 COVID-19 流行前一年和流行后两年的情况进行了调查,以评估烟草使用评估和戒烟帮助,以及亲自就诊与远程医疗就诊之间的差异。在 COVID-19 开始后的两年中,亲诊与远程医疗就诊中烟草评估的可能性要高出 15 倍。鉴于远程医疗就诊很可能会持续下去,因此无论采用哪种就诊方式,确保定期对患者进行烟草评估都是医疗系统需要关注的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of COVID-19 and the Prevalence of In-person Versus Telehealth Primary Care Visits and Subsequent Impacts on Tobacco Use Assessment and Referral for Cessation Assistance.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered patterns of healthcare delivery. Smoking remains an important risk factor for multiple chronic conditions and may exacerbate more severe symptoms of COVID-19. Thus, it is important to understand how pandemic-induced changes in primary care practice patterns affected smoking assessment and cessation assistance.

Aims and methods: Electronic health record data from eight community health centers were examined from March 1, 2019 to February 28, 2022. Data include both telehealth (phone and video) and in-person office visits and represent 310 388 visits by adult patients. Rates of smoking assessment, provision of referral to counseling, and orders for smoking cessation medications were calculated. Comparisons by visit mode and time period were examined using generalized estimating equations and logistic regression.

Results: The proportion of telehealth visits was < 0.1% 1 year prior to COVID-19 onset and, 54.5% and 34.1% 1 and 2 years after. The odds of asking about smoking status and offering a referral to smoking cessation counseling were significantly higher during in-person versus telehealth visits; adjusted odds ratios (AOR) (95% CI) = 15.0 (14.7 to 15.4) and AOR (95% CI) = 6.5 (3.0 to 13.9), respectively. The interaction effect of visit type * time period was significant for ordering smoking cessation medications.

Conclusions: Telehealth visits were significantly less likely to include smoking status assessment and referral to smoking cessation counseling compared to in-person visits. Given that smoking assessment and cessation assistance do not require face-to-face interactions with health care providers, continued efforts are needed to ensure provision at all visits, regardless of modality.

Implications: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered patterns of healthcare-seeking and delivery with a considerable rise in telehealth visits. This study examined 1 year prior to the onset of COVID-19 and 2 years after to evaluate the assessment of tobacco use and assistance with tobacco cessation and differences during in-person versus telehealth visits. Tobacco assessment was 15 times more likely during in-person versus telehealth visits in the 2 years post onset of COVID-19. Given that telehealth visits are likely to continue, ensuring that patients are regularly assessed for tobacco regardless of visit modality is an important concern for health systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
The Context of the Emergency Department as a Location for a Smoking Cessation Intervention-Process Evaluation Findings From the Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department Trial. Behavioral Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of E-Cigarettes on Combustible Cigarette Smoking Among Adults with Opioid Use Disorder on Buprenorphine: Single Arm ERASER Pilot Trial. Vaping and smoking cue reactivity in young adult non-smoking electronic cigarette users: A functional neuroimaging study. Do-it-yourself flavored capsule cigarettes: Exploiting potential regulatory loopholes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1