快速审查负责任的人工智能框架:引导合乎道德的人工智能发展

Jeff Shuford
{"title":"快速审查负责任的人工智能框架:引导合乎道德的人工智能发展","authors":"Jeff Shuford","doi":"10.60087/jaigs.v4i1.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the rapid expansion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its integration into various aspects of daily life have ignited significant discourse on the ethical considerations governing its application. This study addresses these concerns by swiftly reviewing multiple frameworks designed to guide the development and utilization of Responsible AI (RAI) applications. Through this exploration, we analyze each framework's alignment with the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) phases, revealing a predominant focus on the Requirements Elicitation phase, with limited coverage of other stages. Furthermore, we note a scarcity of supportive tools, predominantly offered by private entities. Our findings underscore the absence of a comprehensive framework capable of accommodating both technical and non-technical stakeholders across all SDLC phases, thus revealing a notable gap in the current landscape. This study sheds light on the imperative need for a unified framework encompassing all RAI principles and SDLC phases, accessible to users of varying expertise and objectives.","PeriodicalId":517201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023","volume":"51 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Expedited Examination of Responsible AI Frameworks: Directing Ethical AI Development\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Shuford\",\"doi\":\"10.60087/jaigs.v4i1.138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, the rapid expansion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its integration into various aspects of daily life have ignited significant discourse on the ethical considerations governing its application. This study addresses these concerns by swiftly reviewing multiple frameworks designed to guide the development and utilization of Responsible AI (RAI) applications. Through this exploration, we analyze each framework's alignment with the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) phases, revealing a predominant focus on the Requirements Elicitation phase, with limited coverage of other stages. Furthermore, we note a scarcity of supportive tools, predominantly offered by private entities. Our findings underscore the absence of a comprehensive framework capable of accommodating both technical and non-technical stakeholders across all SDLC phases, thus revealing a notable gap in the current landscape. This study sheds light on the imperative need for a unified framework encompassing all RAI principles and SDLC phases, accessible to users of varying expertise and objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023\",\"volume\":\"51 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60087/jaigs.v4i1.138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60087/jaigs.v4i1.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人工智能(AI)的快速发展及其与日常生活各方面的融合,引发了有关其应用伦理问题的重要讨论。本研究针对这些问题,迅速审查了多个旨在指导负责任的人工智能(RAI)应用开发和使用的框架。通过这一探索,我们分析了每个框架与软件开发生命周期(SDLC)各阶段的一致性,发现其主要侧重于需求征询阶段,对其他阶段的覆盖范围有限。此外,我们还注意到支持性工具很少,主要由私营实体提供。我们的研究结果表明,在 SDLC 的所有阶段,都缺乏一个能够兼顾技术和非技术利益相关者的综合框架,从而揭示了目前存在的一个显著差距。本研究揭示了一个统一框架的迫切需要,该框架应涵盖所有 RAI 原则和 SDLC 阶段,并可供不同专业知识和目标的用户使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Expedited Examination of Responsible AI Frameworks: Directing Ethical AI Development
In recent years, the rapid expansion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its integration into various aspects of daily life have ignited significant discourse on the ethical considerations governing its application. This study addresses these concerns by swiftly reviewing multiple frameworks designed to guide the development and utilization of Responsible AI (RAI) applications. Through this exploration, we analyze each framework's alignment with the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) phases, revealing a predominant focus on the Requirements Elicitation phase, with limited coverage of other stages. Furthermore, we note a scarcity of supportive tools, predominantly offered by private entities. Our findings underscore the absence of a comprehensive framework capable of accommodating both technical and non-technical stakeholders across all SDLC phases, thus revealing a notable gap in the current landscape. This study sheds light on the imperative need for a unified framework encompassing all RAI principles and SDLC phases, accessible to users of varying expertise and objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LLM-Cloud Complete: Leveraging Cloud Computing for Efficient Large Language Model-based Code Completion Utilizing the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Vehicle Telematics for Sustainable Growth in Small and Medium Firms (SMEs) Role of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Sustainable Entrepreneurship Impact of AI on Education: Innovative Tools and Trends Critique of Modern Feminism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1