了解拜占庭/拜占庭

Journal of the British Academy Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.5871/jba/012.a22

Nicholas de Lange, John Haldon

{"title":"了解拜占庭/拜占庭","authors":"Nicholas de Lange, John Haldon","doi":"10.5871/jba/012.a22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis is the first in a series of articles that look at the uses (and limitations) of pieces of academic terminology. This article considers the origins of the terms ‘Byzantium’ and ‘Byzantine’, and considers both their current use in academic discourse, and whether there are more appropriate alternatives.\n","PeriodicalId":93790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the British Academy","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coming to terms with: Byzantium/Byzantine\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas de Lange, John Haldon\",\"doi\":\"10.5871/jba/012.a22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis is the first in a series of articles that look at the uses (and limitations) of pieces of academic terminology. This article considers the origins of the terms ‘Byzantium’ and ‘Byzantine’, and considers both their current use in academic discourse, and whether there are more appropriate alternatives.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":93790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the British Academy\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the British Academy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/012.a22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the British Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/012.a22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是探讨学术术语的使用（和局限性）系列文章的第一篇。本文探讨了 "拜占庭 "和 "拜占庭 "这两个术语的起源，并研究了它们目前在学术话语中的使用情况，以及是否有更合适的替代术语。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Coming to terms with: Byzantium/Byzantine

This is the first in a series of articles that look at the uses (and limitations) of pieces of academic terminology. This article considers the origins of the terms ‘Byzantium’ and ‘Byzantine’, and considers both their current use in academic discourse, and whether there are more appropriate alternatives.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊