I. Fasogbon, Erick Nyakundi Ondari, Tusubira Deusdedit, Loganathan Rangasamy, Sasirekha Krishnan, P. M. Aja
{"title":"基于侧向流的MYCOPLASMA BOVIS感染现场筛查的护理点潜力:文献综述","authors":"I. Fasogbon, Erick Nyakundi Ondari, Tusubira Deusdedit, Loganathan Rangasamy, Sasirekha Krishnan, P. M. Aja","doi":"10.1093/biomethods/bpae034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Point-of-care (POC) field screening for tools for Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) is still lacking due to the requirement for a simple, robust field-applicable test that does not entail specialized laboratory equipment. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, this review identifies the methodologies that were retrieved based on our search strategy, that have been reported for the diagnosis of m. bovis infection between 2014 and diagnostics. A search criteria was generated to curate one hundred and three articles, which were reduced in number (to 46), following the screening guidelines of PRISMA. The 43 articles included in the study present twenty-five different assay methods. The assay methods were grouped as microbiological culture, serological assay, PCR-based assay, LAMP-based assay, NGS-based assay, or Lateral flow assay. We, however, focus our discussion on the three lateral flow-based assays relative to others, highlighting the advantages they present above the other techniques and their potential applicability as a POC diagnostic test for M. bovis infections. We therefore call for further research on developing a lateral flow-based screening tool that could revolutionize the diagnosis of M. bovis infection.","PeriodicalId":36528,"journal":{"name":"Biology Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care potentials of lateral flow-based field screening for MYCOPLASMA BOVIS infections: a literature review\",\"authors\":\"I. Fasogbon, Erick Nyakundi Ondari, Tusubira Deusdedit, Loganathan Rangasamy, Sasirekha Krishnan, P. M. Aja\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biomethods/bpae034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Point-of-care (POC) field screening for tools for Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) is still lacking due to the requirement for a simple, robust field-applicable test that does not entail specialized laboratory equipment. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, this review identifies the methodologies that were retrieved based on our search strategy, that have been reported for the diagnosis of m. bovis infection between 2014 and diagnostics. A search criteria was generated to curate one hundred and three articles, which were reduced in number (to 46), following the screening guidelines of PRISMA. The 43 articles included in the study present twenty-five different assay methods. The assay methods were grouped as microbiological culture, serological assay, PCR-based assay, LAMP-based assay, NGS-based assay, or Lateral flow assay. We, however, focus our discussion on the three lateral flow-based assays relative to others, highlighting the advantages they present above the other techniques and their potential applicability as a POC diagnostic test for M. bovis infections. We therefore call for further research on developing a lateral flow-based screening tool that could revolutionize the diagnosis of M. bovis infection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Methods and Protocols\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Methods and Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpae034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpae034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Point-of-care potentials of lateral flow-based field screening for MYCOPLASMA BOVIS infections: a literature review
Point-of-care (POC) field screening for tools for Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) is still lacking due to the requirement for a simple, robust field-applicable test that does not entail specialized laboratory equipment. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, this review identifies the methodologies that were retrieved based on our search strategy, that have been reported for the diagnosis of m. bovis infection between 2014 and diagnostics. A search criteria was generated to curate one hundred and three articles, which were reduced in number (to 46), following the screening guidelines of PRISMA. The 43 articles included in the study present twenty-five different assay methods. The assay methods were grouped as microbiological culture, serological assay, PCR-based assay, LAMP-based assay, NGS-based assay, or Lateral flow assay. We, however, focus our discussion on the three lateral flow-based assays relative to others, highlighting the advantages they present above the other techniques and their potential applicability as a POC diagnostic test for M. bovis infections. We therefore call for further research on developing a lateral flow-based screening tool that could revolutionize the diagnosis of M. bovis infection.