基于侧向流的MYCOPLASMA BOVIS感染现场筛查的护理点潜力:文献综述

IF 2.5 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Biology Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1093/biomethods/bpae034
I. Fasogbon, Erick Nyakundi Ondari, Tusubira Deusdedit, Loganathan Rangasamy, Sasirekha Krishnan, P. M. Aja
{"title":"基于侧向流的MYCOPLASMA BOVIS感染现场筛查的护理点潜力:文献综述","authors":"I. Fasogbon, Erick Nyakundi Ondari, Tusubira Deusdedit, Loganathan Rangasamy, Sasirekha Krishnan, P. M. Aja","doi":"10.1093/biomethods/bpae034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Point-of-care (POC) field screening for tools for Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) is still lacking due to the requirement for a simple, robust field-applicable test that does not entail specialized laboratory equipment. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, this review identifies the methodologies that were retrieved based on our search strategy, that have been reported for the diagnosis of m. bovis infection between 2014 and diagnostics. A search criteria was generated to curate one hundred and three articles, which were reduced in number (to 46), following the screening guidelines of PRISMA. The 43 articles included in the study present twenty-five different assay methods. The assay methods were grouped as microbiological culture, serological assay, PCR-based assay, LAMP-based assay, NGS-based assay, or Lateral flow assay. We, however, focus our discussion on the three lateral flow-based assays relative to others, highlighting the advantages they present above the other techniques and their potential applicability as a POC diagnostic test for M. bovis infections. We therefore call for further research on developing a lateral flow-based screening tool that could revolutionize the diagnosis of M. bovis infection.","PeriodicalId":36528,"journal":{"name":"Biology Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care potentials of lateral flow-based field screening for MYCOPLASMA BOVIS infections: a literature review\",\"authors\":\"I. Fasogbon, Erick Nyakundi Ondari, Tusubira Deusdedit, Loganathan Rangasamy, Sasirekha Krishnan, P. M. Aja\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biomethods/bpae034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Point-of-care (POC) field screening for tools for Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) is still lacking due to the requirement for a simple, robust field-applicable test that does not entail specialized laboratory equipment. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, this review identifies the methodologies that were retrieved based on our search strategy, that have been reported for the diagnosis of m. bovis infection between 2014 and diagnostics. A search criteria was generated to curate one hundred and three articles, which were reduced in number (to 46), following the screening guidelines of PRISMA. The 43 articles included in the study present twenty-five different assay methods. The assay methods were grouped as microbiological culture, serological assay, PCR-based assay, LAMP-based assay, NGS-based assay, or Lateral flow assay. We, however, focus our discussion on the three lateral flow-based assays relative to others, highlighting the advantages they present above the other techniques and their potential applicability as a POC diagnostic test for M. bovis infections. We therefore call for further research on developing a lateral flow-based screening tool that could revolutionize the diagnosis of M. bovis infection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Methods and Protocols\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Methods and Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpae034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpae034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于需要一种不需要专门实验室设备的简单、可靠的现场适用检验方法,目前仍缺乏对牛支原体(M. bovis)工具的护理点(POC)现场筛查。根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,本综述确定了根据我们的搜索策略检索到的方法,这些方法在 2014 年至诊断期间已被报道用于诊断牛支原体感染。根据 PRISMA 的筛选指南,我们制定了检索标准,并对 103 篇文章进行了筛选,最终将文章数量减少到 46 篇。本研究收录的 43 篇文章介绍了 25 种不同的检测方法。检测方法分为微生物培养法、血清学检测法、基于 PCR 的检测法、基于 LAMP 的检测法、基于 NGS 的检测法或侧流检测法。不过,相对于其他方法,我们重点讨论了三种基于侧向流的检测方法,强调了它们优于其他技术的优势及其作为牛海绵状芽孢杆菌感染 POC 诊断测试的潜在适用性。因此,我们呼吁进一步研究开发基于侧向流的筛查工具,以彻底改变牛海绵状芽孢杆菌感染的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Point-of-care potentials of lateral flow-based field screening for MYCOPLASMA BOVIS infections: a literature review
Point-of-care (POC) field screening for tools for Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) is still lacking due to the requirement for a simple, robust field-applicable test that does not entail specialized laboratory equipment. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, this review identifies the methodologies that were retrieved based on our search strategy, that have been reported for the diagnosis of m. bovis infection between 2014 and diagnostics. A search criteria was generated to curate one hundred and three articles, which were reduced in number (to 46), following the screening guidelines of PRISMA. The 43 articles included in the study present twenty-five different assay methods. The assay methods were grouped as microbiological culture, serological assay, PCR-based assay, LAMP-based assay, NGS-based assay, or Lateral flow assay. We, however, focus our discussion on the three lateral flow-based assays relative to others, highlighting the advantages they present above the other techniques and their potential applicability as a POC diagnostic test for M. bovis infections. We therefore call for further research on developing a lateral flow-based screening tool that could revolutionize the diagnosis of M. bovis infection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Methods and Protocols
Biology Methods and Protocols Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Western blotting immunodetection: Streamlining antibody cocktails for reduced protocol time and enhanced multiplexing applications. Live cell fluorescence microscopy-an end-to-end workflow for high-throughput image and data analysis. A reproducible method to study traumatic injury-induced zebrafish brain regeneration. Cluster analysis identifies long COVID subtypes in Belgian patients. Unpacking unstructured data: A pilot study on extracting insights from neuropathological reports of Parkinson's Disease patients using large language models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1