在实践社区组合中不学习:欧盟及其在阿拉伯世界的民主支持案例

Christian Achrainer, Michelle Pace
{"title":"在实践社区组合中不学习:欧盟及其在阿拉伯世界的民主支持案例","authors":"Christian Achrainer, Michelle Pace","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the puzzle of why the European Union (EU) struggles to learn from ineffective attempts to support democratization in the Arab world but instead continuously (re‐)produces democracy support malpractices. To better understand this phenomenon, we draw from practice theory and conceptualize EU democracy support as practices performed by a community of insiders who act within a complex constellation of communities of practice. Due to the way in which communities function, decision‐makers do not critically reflect on the background knowledge on which they base their practices and thus do not learn how to improve them. This constellation model offers a unique take on non‐learning within the EU and in (policy‐making) groups more generally. We illustrate the proposed conceptual framework through an empirical analysis of EU democracy support in Egypt, showing that the EU performs practices similar to those before the 2011 Revolution due to its inability to learn.","PeriodicalId":516279,"journal":{"name":"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"58 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non‐learning Within a Constellation of Communities of Practice: The Case of the EU and Its Democracy Support in the Arab World\",\"authors\":\"Christian Achrainer, Michelle Pace\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcms.13629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article addresses the puzzle of why the European Union (EU) struggles to learn from ineffective attempts to support democratization in the Arab world but instead continuously (re‐)produces democracy support malpractices. To better understand this phenomenon, we draw from practice theory and conceptualize EU democracy support as practices performed by a community of insiders who act within a complex constellation of communities of practice. Due to the way in which communities function, decision‐makers do not critically reflect on the background knowledge on which they base their practices and thus do not learn how to improve them. This constellation model offers a unique take on non‐learning within the EU and in (policy‐making) groups more generally. We illustrate the proposed conceptual framework through an empirical analysis of EU democracy support in Egypt, showing that the EU performs practices similar to those before the 2011 Revolution due to its inability to learn.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"volume\":\"58 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了欧盟(EU)为何不努力从支持阿拉伯世界民主化的无效尝试中吸取经验教训,反而不断(重新)制造民主支持弊端的难题。为了更好地理解这一现象,我们借鉴了实践理论,将欧盟的民主支持概念化为由在复杂的实践社区中行动的内部人士社区所实施的实践。由于社区的运作方式,决策者不会对其实践所依据的背景知识进行批判性反思,因此也不会学习如何改进这些实践。这个星座模型为欧盟内部以及更广泛的(决策)群体中的非学习现象提供了一个独特的视角。我们通过对欧盟在埃及的民主支持进行实证分析来说明所提出的概念框架,结果表明,由于欧盟无法学习,其做法与 2011 年革命前的做法相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non‐learning Within a Constellation of Communities of Practice: The Case of the EU and Its Democracy Support in the Arab World
This article addresses the puzzle of why the European Union (EU) struggles to learn from ineffective attempts to support democratization in the Arab world but instead continuously (re‐)produces democracy support malpractices. To better understand this phenomenon, we draw from practice theory and conceptualize EU democracy support as practices performed by a community of insiders who act within a complex constellation of communities of practice. Due to the way in which communities function, decision‐makers do not critically reflect on the background knowledge on which they base their practices and thus do not learn how to improve them. This constellation model offers a unique take on non‐learning within the EU and in (policy‐making) groups more generally. We illustrate the proposed conceptual framework through an empirical analysis of EU democracy support in Egypt, showing that the EU performs practices similar to those before the 2011 Revolution due to its inability to learn.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doing the Same With Different Results: Variations in EU Presidencies of Austria, Finland, Slovakia and Czechia Non‐learning Within a Constellation of Communities of Practice: The Case of the EU and Its Democracy Support in the Arab World Norm Contestation in EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights When EU Agencies Set Up Advisory Committees: All About Autonomy? The Tools of External Migration Policy in the EU Member States: The Case of Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1