澳大利亚救护车服务中患者性别对辅助医务人员对急性腹痛患者实施镇痛的影响

Sooaad Dahoud, Paul Simpson, Navindhra Naidoo
{"title":"澳大利亚救护车服务中患者性别对辅助医务人员对急性腹痛患者实施镇痛的影响","authors":"Sooaad Dahoud, Paul Simpson, Navindhra Naidoo","doi":"10.1177/27536386241253145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Pain is a subjective experience that encapsulates a physical, emotional, and mental response. An individual's sex is a factor that may influence how pain is experienced. It can be assumed that if females and males present with pain differently, then pain management may also differ. This research aimed to determine the influence of patients’ sex on paramedic administration of analgesia in cases of acute abdominal pain. Methods: A retrospective analytical cohort study included patients between the ages of 16 and 65 with a complaint of abdominal pain who were seen by paramedics employed by a jurisdictional ambulance service between July 2019 and June 2020. The data extracted included sex, age, pain score, type of analgesia administered, and analgesia dosage. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: The study sample comprised of 26,417 patients with 61.6% (n  =  16,271) females. Analgesia was administered to 65.9% (n  =  17,404) of patients, of whom 38.5% (n  =  10,177) received an opioid, with the most administered analgesia being morphine (n  =  8456; 32%). Chi-square testing identified significant associations between sex and analgesic administration (χ2(1, n  =  26,417)  =  7.32, p  =  .01, Φ = −0.02) and opioid administration (χ2(1, n  =  26,417)  =  25.51, p < .001, Φ = 0.03). Multivariate regression identified that sex had no influence on analgesic administration in general, however found that male sex was a statistically significant predictor of opioid administration. Adjusted for age and pain severity, females were at lower odds of opioid administration than males (adjusted odds ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.80–0.91; p < .001). Conclusions: Equity in pain management was demonstrated in relation to overall analgesic administration between the sexes. However, this research suggests that while females presented more commonly with abdominal pain, females had lower odds of being administered an opioid than their male counterparts. Further research is required on gender bias in relation to abdominal pain management practices by paramedics, to promote equitable access to analgesia.","PeriodicalId":509430,"journal":{"name":"Paramedicine","volume":"131 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of patient sex on paramedic administration of analgesia for acute abdominal pain in an Australian ambulance service\",\"authors\":\"Sooaad Dahoud, Paul Simpson, Navindhra Naidoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536386241253145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Pain is a subjective experience that encapsulates a physical, emotional, and mental response. An individual's sex is a factor that may influence how pain is experienced. It can be assumed that if females and males present with pain differently, then pain management may also differ. This research aimed to determine the influence of patients’ sex on paramedic administration of analgesia in cases of acute abdominal pain. Methods: A retrospective analytical cohort study included patients between the ages of 16 and 65 with a complaint of abdominal pain who were seen by paramedics employed by a jurisdictional ambulance service between July 2019 and June 2020. The data extracted included sex, age, pain score, type of analgesia administered, and analgesia dosage. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: The study sample comprised of 26,417 patients with 61.6% (n  =  16,271) females. Analgesia was administered to 65.9% (n  =  17,404) of patients, of whom 38.5% (n  =  10,177) received an opioid, with the most administered analgesia being morphine (n  =  8456; 32%). Chi-square testing identified significant associations between sex and analgesic administration (χ2(1, n  =  26,417)  =  7.32, p  =  .01, Φ = −0.02) and opioid administration (χ2(1, n  =  26,417)  =  25.51, p < .001, Φ = 0.03). Multivariate regression identified that sex had no influence on analgesic administration in general, however found that male sex was a statistically significant predictor of opioid administration. Adjusted for age and pain severity, females were at lower odds of opioid administration than males (adjusted odds ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.80–0.91; p < .001). Conclusions: Equity in pain management was demonstrated in relation to overall analgesic administration between the sexes. However, this research suggests that while females presented more commonly with abdominal pain, females had lower odds of being administered an opioid than their male counterparts. Further research is required on gender bias in relation to abdominal pain management practices by paramedics, to promote equitable access to analgesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"131 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386241253145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386241253145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客观疼痛是一种主观体验,包含生理、情感和心理反应。个人的性别是影响疼痛体验的一个因素。可以假设,如果女性和男性的疼痛表现不同,那么疼痛管理也可能不同。本研究旨在确定在急性腹痛病例中,患者性别对辅助医务人员实施镇痛的影响。研究方法这是一项回顾性分析队列研究,研究对象包括在 2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 6 月期间由某辖区救护服务机构聘用的辅助医务人员接诊的主诉腹痛的 16 至 65 岁患者。提取的数据包括性别、年龄、疼痛评分、镇痛类型和镇痛剂量。数据采用描述性统计、卡方检验、单变量和多变量逻辑回归进行分析。研究结果研究样本包括 26,417 名患者,其中女性占 61.6%(n=16,271)。65.9%的患者(n=17404)接受了镇痛治疗,其中38.5%的患者(n=10177)接受了阿片类药物治疗,使用最多的镇痛药物是吗啡(n=8456;32%)。通过卡方检验发现,性别与镇痛剂用量(χ2(1, n = 26,417) = 7.32, p = .01, Φ = -0.02)和阿片类药物用量(χ2(1, n = 26,417) = 25.51, p < .001, Φ = 0.03)之间存在显著关联。多变量回归结果表明,性别对镇痛药的使用总体上没有影响,但男性对阿片类药物的使用有显著的统计学预测作用。根据年龄和疼痛严重程度进行调整后,女性使用阿片类药物的几率低于男性(调整后的几率比为 0.86;95% 置信区间为 0.80-0.91;P < .001)。结论在镇痛剂的总体使用方面,两性之间的疼痛管理体现出了公平性。然而,这项研究表明,虽然女性腹痛更为常见,但女性使用阿片类药物的几率却低于男性。需要进一步研究辅助医务人员在腹痛处理方法方面的性别偏见,以促进平等获得镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of patient sex on paramedic administration of analgesia for acute abdominal pain in an Australian ambulance service
Objective: Pain is a subjective experience that encapsulates a physical, emotional, and mental response. An individual's sex is a factor that may influence how pain is experienced. It can be assumed that if females and males present with pain differently, then pain management may also differ. This research aimed to determine the influence of patients’ sex on paramedic administration of analgesia in cases of acute abdominal pain. Methods: A retrospective analytical cohort study included patients between the ages of 16 and 65 with a complaint of abdominal pain who were seen by paramedics employed by a jurisdictional ambulance service between July 2019 and June 2020. The data extracted included sex, age, pain score, type of analgesia administered, and analgesia dosage. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: The study sample comprised of 26,417 patients with 61.6% (n  =  16,271) females. Analgesia was administered to 65.9% (n  =  17,404) of patients, of whom 38.5% (n  =  10,177) received an opioid, with the most administered analgesia being morphine (n  =  8456; 32%). Chi-square testing identified significant associations between sex and analgesic administration (χ2(1, n  =  26,417)  =  7.32, p  =  .01, Φ = −0.02) and opioid administration (χ2(1, n  =  26,417)  =  25.51, p < .001, Φ = 0.03). Multivariate regression identified that sex had no influence on analgesic administration in general, however found that male sex was a statistically significant predictor of opioid administration. Adjusted for age and pain severity, females were at lower odds of opioid administration than males (adjusted odds ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.80–0.91; p < .001). Conclusions: Equity in pain management was demonstrated in relation to overall analgesic administration between the sexes. However, this research suggests that while females presented more commonly with abdominal pain, females had lower odds of being administered an opioid than their male counterparts. Further research is required on gender bias in relation to abdominal pain management practices by paramedics, to promote equitable access to analgesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of out-of-hospital research in Ireland from 2000 to 2022 Paramedic educational interventions for out-of-hospital domestic and intimate partner violence cases: A scoping review Influence of patient sex on pain management practices in Paramedicine: A rapid review A qualitative study on the relationship between leadership and clinical skills in paramedicine and the promotion of patient safety Leveraging collaboration to enhance quality in paramedicine research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1